Sequential product positioning on a platform in the presence of network effects

Abstract We analyze in a game-theoretic framework the sequential product positioning problem of two asymmetric firms with different quality levels on a platform when network effects present, where the negative influences of product differentiation on product compatibility are explicitly considered. We obtain closed-form solutions to the positioning problem, and reveal that whether the traditional wisdom of positioning in the mass market is still optimal for the leader in our setting depends not only on whether it has a quality advantage over the follower, but also on the intensity of the network effects. For the follower, as the network effects increase or its quality advantage increases, its product positioning approaches the mass product; otherwise, the opposite is true. We also observe that the optimal degree of differentiation has certain robustness with respect to the order of the positioning decisions. In addition, we find that the degree of product differentiation in the sequential positioning scenario is lower than in the simultaneously positioning scenario, while it is higher than in the social welfare maximization scenario. This research provides concrete guidelines for high-tech firms to make pertinent strategic decisions, and lays a foundation for platform managers to design policies to coordinate its members.

[1]  Bo Zhou,et al.  Competition of Content Acquisition and Distribution Under Consumer Multipurchase , 2019, Journal of Marketing Research.

[2]  R. Saito,et al.  Sequential product positioning in the presence of an asymmetric network externality intensity , 2018 .

[3]  C. Shapiro,et al.  Technology Adoption in the Presence of Network Externalities , 1986, Journal of Political Economy.

[4]  M. D. Cintio On the hotelling principle of minimum differentiation: imitation and crowd , 2006 .

[5]  Tsuyoshi Toshimitsu Strategic Compatibility Choice, Network Alliance, and Welfare , 2018 .

[6]  M. Tombak,et al.  Endogenous location leadership , 2009 .

[7]  Alexander Rasch Compatibility, network effects, and collusion , 2017 .

[8]  Nikolaos Vettas,et al.  Price Competition in a Differentiated Products Duopoly Under Network Effects , 2004, Inf. Econ. Policy.

[9]  C. Shapiro,et al.  Systems Competition and Network Effects , 1994 .

[10]  Guo Li,et al.  The impact of decision timing on the suppliers’ interactions: simultaneous moves versus sequential moves , 2016, J. Oper. Res. Soc..

[11]  Daisuke Shimizu,et al.  Product Differentiation and Entry Timing in a Continuous Time Spatial Competition Model , 2014, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[12]  Christian Ahlin,et al.  Product Differentiation Under Congestion: Hotelling Was Right , 2013 .

[13]  C. Shapiro,et al.  Network Externalities, Competition, and Compatibility , 1985 .

[14]  Ramon Casadesus-Masanell,et al.  Platform Competition, Compatibility, and Social Efficiency , 2008 .

[15]  Maruyama Masayoshi,et al.  Compatibility and the Product Life Cycle in Two-Sided Markets , 2013 .

[16]  Jacques-François Thisse,et al.  On hotelling's "Stability in competition" , 1979 .

[17]  R. Tyagi Sequential Product Positioning Under Differential Costs , 2000 .

[18]  H. Hotelling Stability in Competition , 1929 .

[19]  He Li,et al.  Competition in wearable device market: the effect of network externality and product compatibility , 2017, Electron. Commer. Res..

[20]  Pio Baake,et al.  Vertical product differentiation, network externalities, and compatibility decisions , 2001 .

[21]  Toker Doganoglu,et al.  Multihoming and compatibility , 2006 .

[22]  Luca Lambertini,et al.  Unicity of the equilibrium in the unconstrained Hotelling model , 1997 .

[23]  Luca Lambertini,et al.  On Hotelling's ‘stability in competition’ with network externalities and switching costs† , 2013 .

[24]  Julian Wright,et al.  Multi-Sided Platforms , 2015 .

[25]  Joseph Farrell,et al.  Standardization, Compatibility, and Innovation , 1985 .

[26]  K. Conrad Price Competition and Product Differentiation when Goods have Network Effects , 2006 .

[27]  Jacques-François Thisse,et al.  Asymmetric equilibria in spatial competition , 1995 .

[28]  Pin Zhou,et al.  Balancing product differentiation and cost saving in the presence of consumer deliberation , 2019, Int. Trans. Oper. Res..

[29]  Christoph H. Loch,et al.  Product Positioning in a Two‐Dimensional Market Space , 2009 .

[30]  Location Decisions of Competing Networks , 2012 .

[31]  Steven Bond‐Smith The impact of compatibility on innovation in markets with network effects , 2019, Economics of Innovation and New Technology.

[32]  Jay Pil Choi,et al.  Network Externality, Compatibility Choice, and Planned Obsolescence , 1994 .

[33]  Christian Wey,et al.  On the role of consumer expectations in markets with network effects , 2012 .

[34]  Chun-Hui Miao,et al.  Limiting Compatibility in Two-sided Markets , 2009 .