Identification of Essentially Derived Varieties Obtained from Biparental Crosses of Homozygous Lines. III. AFLP Data from Maize Inbreds and Comparison with SSR Data

[1]  J. Reif,et al.  Linkage disequilibrium in European elite maize germplasm investigated with SSRs , 2005, Theoretical and Applied Genetics.

[2]  M. Bohn,et al.  Identification of essentially derived varieties with molecular markers: an approach based on statistical test theory and computer simulations , 2005, Theoretical and Applied Genetics.

[3]  M. Bohn,et al.  Identification of essentially derived varieties obtained from biparental crosses of homozygous lines: II. Morphological distances and heterosis in comparison with simple sequence repeat and amplified fragment length polymorphism data in maize , 2005 .

[4]  M. Bohn,et al.  Identification of Essentially Derived Varieties Obtained from Biparental Crosses of Homozygous Lines: I. Simple Sequence Repeat Data from Maize Inbreds , 2005 .

[5]  Л. Й. Глухівський About the conformity of the national legislation concern- ing the right protection for plant varieties to the International Convention for the Protection of New Varieties of Plants , 2005 .

[6]  F. Eeuwijk,et al.  The establishment of ‘essential derivation’ among rose varieties, using AFLP , 2004, Theoretical and Applied Genetics.

[7]  A. Melchinger,et al.  Plabsoft: software for simulation and data analysis in plant breeding. , 2004 .

[8]  M. Bohn,et al.  Variation of DNA fingerprints among accessions within maize inbred lines and implications for identification of essentially derived varieties: II. Genetic and technical sources of variation in AFLP data and comparison with SSR data , 2003, Molecular Breeding.

[9]  J. Ziegle,et al.  Variation of DNA fingerprints among accessions within maize inbred lines and implications for identification of essentially derived varieties. , 2002, Molecular Breeding.

[10]  J. Doebley,et al.  Microsatellites in Zea – variability, patterns of mutations, and use for evolutionary studies , 2002, Theoretical and Applied Genetics.

[11]  I. Roldán‐Ruiz,et al.  Data from amplified fragment length polymorphism (AFLP) markers show indication of size homoplasy and of a relationship between degree of homoplasy and fragment size , 2002, Molecular ecology.

[12]  V. Lefebvre,et al.  Evaluation of genetic distances between pepper inbred lines for cultivar protection purposes: comparison of AFLP, RAPD and phenotypic data , 2001, Theoretical and Applied Genetics.

[13]  F. Eeuwijk,et al.  Conceptual and statistical issues related to the use of molecular markers for distinctness and essential derivation , 2001 .

[14]  V. Lombard,et al.  Genetic Relationships and Fingerprinting of Rapeseed Cultivars by AFLP: Consequences for Varietal Registration , 2000 .

[15]  R. Mank,et al.  Further characterization of AFLP® data as a tool in genetic diversity assessments among maize (Zea mays L.) inbred lines , 2000, Molecular Breeding.

[16]  R. Bernardo,et al.  Variance of marker estimates of parental contribution to F2 and BC1-derived inbreds. , 2000 .

[17]  Albrecht E. Melchinger,et al.  Relationships among Early European Maize Inbreds: IV. Genetic Diversity Revealed with AFLP Markers and Comparison with RFLP, RAPD, and Pedigree Data , 2000 .

[18]  A. Melchinger,et al.  Two high-density AFLP® linkage maps of Zea mays L.: analysis of distribution of AFLP markers , 1999, Theoretical and Applied Genetics.

[19]  S. Tanksley,et al.  Identifying the loci responsible for natural variation in fruit size and shape in tomato , 1999, Theoretical and Applied Genetics.

[20]  W. G. Hill,et al.  On the precision of estimation of genetic distance , 1999, Genetics Selection Evolution.

[21]  S. Kresovich,et al.  An evaluation of the utility of SSR loci as molecular markers in maize (Zea mays L.): comparisons with data from RFLPS and pedigree , 1997, Theoretical and Applied Genetics.

[22]  Ross Ihaka,et al.  Gentleman R: R: A language for data analysis and graphics , 1996 .

[23]  Michele Morgante,et al.  The comparison of RFLP, RAPD, AFLP and SSR (microsatellite) markers for germplasm analysis , 1996, Molecular Breeding.

[24]  N. L. Johnson,et al.  Continuous Univariate Distributions. , 1995 .

[25]  O. Smith,et al.  Estimation of sampling variance of molecular marker data using the bootstrap procedure , 1994, Theoretical and Applied Genetics.

[26]  M. Morgante,et al.  Genetic mapping and variability of seven soybean simple sequence repeat loci. , 1994, Genome.

[27]  A. Graner,et al.  Relationships among European Barley Germplasm: I. Genetic Diversity among Winter and Spring Cultivars Revealed by RFLPs , 1994 .

[28]  S. Tanksley,et al.  Abundance, polymorphism and genetic mapping of microsatellites in rice , 1993, Molecular and General Genetics MGG.

[29]  G. Churchill,et al.  Optimizing parental selection for genetic linkage maps. , 1993, Genome.

[30]  G. Martin,et al.  High density molecular linkage maps of the tomato and potato genomes. , 1992, Genetics.

[31]  A. Melchinger,et al.  Diversity and Relationships among U.S. Maize Inbreds Revealed by Restriction Fragment Length Polymorphisms , 1991 .

[32]  L. A. Goodman On the Exact Variance of Products , 1960 .

[33]  G. Volckaert,et al.  Reproducibility testing of RAPD, AFLP and SSR markers in plants by a network of European laboratories , 2004, Molecular Breeding.

[34]  A. Zhan,et al.  AFLP LINKAGE MAP OF AN INTRASPECIFIC CROSS IN CHLAMYS FARRERI , 2004 .

[35]  M. Bohn,et al.  5. Identification of essentially derived varieties (EDVs) derived from biparental crosses of homozygous lines. II. Morphological distances and heterosis in comparison with SSR and AFLP data in maize , 2004 .

[36]  T. Rocheford,et al.  Germplasm Ownership: Related Corn Inbreds. , 2002, Crop science.

[37]  M. Bohn,et al.  PLABSIM: software for simulation of marker-assisted backcrossing. , 2000, The Journal of heredity.

[38]  M. Senior,et al.  The utility of simple sequence repeat (SSR) data to preferentially identify progeny lines of maize (Zea mays L.) that are bred from known inbred parents. , 2000 .

[39]  P. Ajmone-Marsan,et al.  Comparative analysis of genetic similarity among maize inbred lines detected by RFLPs, RAPDs, SSRs, and AFLPs , 1998, Theoretical and Applied Genetics.

[40]  P. Vos,et al.  AFLP: a new technique for DNA fingerprinting. , 1995, Nucleic acids research.

[41]  W. J. Langford Statistical Methods , 1959, Nature.

[42]  G. Malécot,et al.  Les mathématiques de l'hérédité , 1948 .