Effect of relative stimulus validity: learning or performance deficit?

This research examined whether the effect of relative stimulus validity (A.R. Wagner, F.A. Logan, K. Haberlandt, & T. Price, 1968) is a deficit of acquisition or performance. Experiment 1 demonstrated the relative validity effect using rats in a conditioned lick suppression. task. A target cue trained in the presence of another cue that was a more valid predictor of reinforcement exhibited less behavioral control than a target cue that had been trained in the presence of an equally valid predictor of reinforcement. In Experiment 2, the more valid predictor was extinguished after training. This manipulation increased responding to the target cue, thereby attenuating the effect of low relative validity. This outcome suggests that the relative validity effect is a performance deficit. In addition, recovery from the relative validity deficit was specific to the particular target stimulus that was trained in the presence of the subsequently extinguished cue.

[1]  R. Bolles,et al.  A nonassociative aspect of overshadowing , 1981 .

[2]  E. Wasserman STIMULUS-REINFORCER PREDICTIVENESS AND SELECTIVE DISCRIMINATION LEARNING IN PIGEONS ' , 1974 .

[3]  A. Dickinson,et al.  Contingency Effects with Maintained Instrumental Reinforcement , 1985 .

[4]  Ralph R. Miller,et al.  The comparator hypothesis: A response rule for the expression of associations. , 1988 .

[5]  K. Haberlandt,et al.  Stimulus selection in animal discrimination learning. , 1968, Journal of Experimental Psychology.

[6]  R. R. Miller,et al.  Responding to a conditioned stimulus depends on the current associative status of other cues present during training of that specific stimulus. , 1992, Journal of experimental psychology. Animal behavior processes.

[7]  N. Mackintosh A Theory of Attention: Variations in the Associability of Stimuli with Reinforcement , 1975 .

[8]  W. Bellingham,et al.  Attenuation of overshadowing as a function of nondifferential compound conditioning trials , 1981 .

[9]  E. Wasserman,et al.  Cue Competition in Causality Judgments: The Role of Nonpresentation of Compound Stimulus Elements , 1994 .

[10]  N. Mackintosh Overshadowing and stimulus intensity , 1976, Animal learning & behavior.

[11]  W. F. Prokasy,et al.  Classical conditioning II: Current research and theory. , 1972 .

[12]  Ralph R. Miller,et al.  Blocking as a Retrieval Failure: Reactivation of Associations to a Blocked Stimulus , 1982, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. B, Comparative and physiological psychology.

[13]  Ralph R. Miller,et al.  Covariation in conditioned response strength between stimuli trained in compound , 1987 .

[14]  Ralph R. Miller,et al.  Recovery of an overshadowed association achieved by extinction of the overshadowing stimulus. , 1985 .

[15]  R. R. Miller,et al.  Associative effects of US preexposure: modulation of conditioned responding by an excitatory training context. , 1987, Journal of experimental psychology. Animal behavior processes.

[16]  N. Spear,et al.  Expression of a taste aversion conditioned with an odor-taste compound: Overshadowing is relatively weak in weanlings and decreases over a retention interval in adults , 1988 .

[17]  H. Terrace,et al.  Autoshaping and Conditioning Theory , 1980 .

[18]  R. Bolles,et al.  Contextual control of the extinction of conditioned fear , 1979 .

[19]  D Marr,et al.  Early processing of visual information. , 1976, Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences.

[20]  Ralph R. Miller,et al.  Reminder-induced recovery of associations to an overshadowed stimulus , 1982 .

[21]  R. Rescorla,et al.  A theory of Pavlovian conditioning : Variations in the effectiveness of reinforcement and nonreinforcement , 1972 .

[22]  Ralph R. Miller,et al.  Overshadowing-like effects between potential comparator stimuli: Covariation in comparator roles of context and punctate excitor used in inhibitory training as a function of excitor salience☆ , 1992 .

[23]  R. R. Miller,et al.  Retrieval variability: sources and consequences. , 1986, The American journal of psychology.

[24]  N. Spear,et al.  The Influence of Retention Interval on the US Preexposure Effect: Changes in Contextual Blocking over Time , 1993 .

[25]  E. Wasserman Attribution of Causality to Common and Distinctive Elements of Compound Stimuli , 1990 .

[26]  Ralph R. Miller,et al.  Inflation of comparator stimuli following CS training , 1990 .