Individualized and generalized earphone correction filters for spatil sound reproduction

Earphone-based simulation of Head-Related Transfer Functions (HRTFs) is a common component of spatial auditory display for virtual sound sources located in virtual environments, but one technical component of HRTF deployment that requires special care has not always received proper attention. The audio signals to be presented to the listener are not often properly corrected for the response of earphones, and yet such correction has long been regarded as crucial to the success of spatial sound reproduction using earphones. Two approaches to developing Earphone Correction Filters (ECFs) are contrasted in this paper, one based on the assumption that the ECF must be based upon an inversion the user’s individually measured Earphone Transfer Functions, and the other based upon the assumption that a satisfactory result can be attained through a general equalization for correcting the tone coloration imparted by the averaged ETF. The results of these two approaches were perceptually evaluated for a range of stimuli generated by varying the shape of an experimental ECF using a fouralternative, forced-choice (4AFC) test. Changes in auditory imagery associated with speech stimuli were easily detected and discriminated when comparing reproductions with and without earphone correction, but perceptual differences were much more difficult to detect as the shape of the experimental ECF was varied by frequency scaling. Further forced-choice tests showed that ECF frequency scaling factors of 0.8 and 1.2 do not result in detectable differences, but factors of 0.6 or 1.4 make detectable differences.

[1]  Matti Karjalainen,et al.  Listening Test Methodology for Headphone Evaluation , 2003 .

[2]  E Villchur,et al.  Free-field calibration of earphones. , 1969, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[3]  Henrik Møller,et al.  Transfer characteristics of headphones measured on human ears , 1995 .

[4]  Günther Theile,et al.  On the standardization of the frequency response of high-quality studio headphones , 1986 .

[5]  J. Blauert Spatial Hearing: The Psychophysics of Human Sound Localization , 1983 .

[6]  Benjamin B. Bauer Improving Headphone Listening Comfort , 1965 .

[7]  William L. Martens,et al.  Multidimensional Perceptual Unfolding of Spatially Processed Speech I: Deriving Stimulus Space Using INDSCAL , 2000 .

[8]  E. Zwicker,et al.  Audio engineering and psychoacoustics: matching signals to the final receiver, the human auditory system , 1991 .

[9]  David Griesinger,et al.  Equalization and Spatial Equalization of Dummy Head Recordings for Loudspeaker Reproduction , 1989 .

[10]  R. M. Sachs,et al.  Anthropometric manikin for acoustic research. , 1975, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[11]  Mead C. Killion Equalization Filter for Eardrum-Pressure Recording Using a KEMAR Manikin , 1979 .

[12]  William L. Martens,et al.  Perceptual evaluation of filters controlling source direction : Customized and generalized HRTFs for binaural synthesis , 2003 .

[13]  Jon R. Sank Improved Real-Ear Test for Stereophones , 1980 .

[14]  Jean-Marc Jot,et al.  Equalization Methods in Binaural Technology , 1998 .

[15]  Henrik Møller,et al.  Design Criteria for Headphones , 1995 .

[16]  William A. Yost,et al.  Spatial hearing: The psychophysics of human sound localization, revised edition , 1998 .

[17]  William L. Martens,et al.  RAPID PSYCHOPHYSICAL CALIBRATION USING BISECTION SCALING FOR INDIVIDUALIZED CONTROL OF SOURCE ELEVATION IN AUDITORY DISPLAY , 2002 .

[18]  D Pralong,et al.  The role of individualized headphone calibration for the generation of high fidelity virtual auditory space. , 1996, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[19]  J.C. Middlebrooks Narrowband Sound Localization Related To Acoustical Cues , 1991, Final Program and Paper Summaries 1991 IEEE ASSP Workshop on Applications of Signal Processing to Audio and Acoustics.