Fractality and self-similarity in scale-free networks

Fractal scaling and self-similar connectivity behaviour of scale-free (SF) networks are reviewed and investigated in diverse aspects. We first recall an algorithm of box-covering that is useful and easy to implement in SF networks, the so-called random sequential box-covering. Next, to understand the origin of the fractal scaling, fractal networks are viewed as comprising of a skeleton and shortcuts. The skeleton, embedded underneath the original network, is a spanning tree specifically based on the edge-betweenness centrality or load. We show that the skeleton is a non-causal tree, either critical or supercritical. We also study the fractal scaling property of the k-core of a fractal network and find that as k increases, not only does the fractal dimension of the k-core change but also eventually the fractality no longer holds for large enough k. Finally, we study the self-similarity, manifested as the scale-invariance of the degree distribution under coarse-graining of vertices by the box-covering method. We obtain the condition for self-similarity, which turns out to be independent of the fractality, and find that some non-fractal networks are self-similar. Therefore, fractality and self-similarity are disparate notions in SF networks.

[1]  T. E. Harris,et al.  The Theory of Branching Processes. , 1963 .

[2]  Leonard M. Freeman,et al.  A set of measures of centrality based upon betweenness , 1977 .

[3]  Stephen B. Seidman,et al.  Network structure and minimum degree , 1983 .

[4]  Albert,et al.  Emergence of scaling in random networks , 1999, Science.

[5]  Z. Burda,et al.  Statistical ensemble of scale-free random graphs. , 2001, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[6]  K. Goh,et al.  Universal behavior of load distribution in scale-free networks. , 2001, Physical review letters.

[7]  B Kahng,et al.  Sandpile on scale-free networks. , 2003, Physical review letters.

[8]  The statistical geometry of scale-free random trees , 2003, cond-mat/0308624.

[9]  Hawoong Jeong,et al.  Scale-free trees: the skeletons of complex networks. , 2004, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[10]  Beom Jun Kim Geographical coarse graining of complex networks. , 2004, Physical review letters.

[11]  Stefan Wuchty,et al.  Peeling the yeast protein network , 2005, Proteomics.

[12]  D. Sornette,et al.  Power-law Distributions of Offspring and Generation Numbers in Branching Models of Earthquake Triggering , 2003, cond-mat/0305007.

[13]  S. Havlin,et al.  Self-similarity of complex networks , 2005, Nature.

[14]  Alessandro Vespignani,et al.  K-core Decomposition: a Tool for the Visualization of Large Scale Networks , 2005, ArXiv.

[15]  P. Holme Core-periphery organization of complex networks. , 2005, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[16]  Hildegard Meyer-Ortmanns,et al.  Self-similar scale-free networks and disassortativity. , 2005, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[17]  K-I Goh,et al.  Skeleton and fractal scaling in complex networks. , 2006, Physical review letters.

[18]  Shlomo Havlin,et al.  Origins of fractality in the growth of complex networks , 2005, cond-mat/0507216.

[19]  Sergey N. Dorogovtsev,et al.  K-core Organization of Complex Networks , 2005, Physical review letters.

[20]  V. Latora,et al.  Complex networks: Structure and dynamics , 2006 .

[21]  Mark E. J. Newman,et al.  Structure and Dynamics of Networks , 2009 .

[22]  J S Kim,et al.  Fractality in complex networks: critical and supercritical skeletons. , 2006, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[23]  R. Rosenfeld Nature , 2009, Otolaryngology--head and neck surgery : official journal of American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery.