Predictors and long-term clinical outcomes of newly developed atrial fibrillation in patients with cardiac implantable electronic devices

Objective: To evaluate predictors and long-term prognosis of atrial fibrillation (AF) following cardiac implantable electronic device (CIED) implantation in patients without history of AF. Methods: From May 1994 to April 2014, 1825 patients with CIED were enrolled in a retrospective, single-center registry. A total of 880 patients from the registry without prior documented AF history were included in the final analysis and were placed into either non-detected AF (NDAF) group or CIED-detected AF group according to development of AF over a follow-up period of 7 years. AF development was defined as any paroxysmal atrial tachyarrhythmia (atrial rate ≥ 180 beats/min) lasting at least 5 minutes according to CIED records. Results: Overall, 122 (13.8%) of the 880 patients experienced new development of AF during follow-up period. According to multivariate analysis, the independent predictors for development of AF were prior heart failure (hazard ratio [HR], 2.40; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.50–3.85; P < 0.001), prior sinus node dysfunction (HR, 2.33; 95% CI, 1.62–3.55; P < 0.001), and left atrium volume index of 38.5 mL/m2 or more (HR, 2.01; 95% CI, 1.23–3.30; P = 0.005). In CDAF group, the risk of heart failure readmission (adjusted HR, 3.79; 95% CI, 1.99–7.22; P < 0.001) and stroke readmission (adjusted HR, 5.33; 95% CI, 1.58–17.97; P = 0.007) was higher than in nondetected AF group. Conclusion: In patients with CIED, prior history of heart failure, sinus node dysfunction, and LA volume index ≥38.5 mL/m2 were independent predictors of new AF cases. Newly developed AF was significantly associated with increased risk of HF and stroke readmission, according to long-term follow up.

[1]  E. Benjamin,et al.  Global epidemiology of atrial fibrillation , 2016, Nature Reviews Cardiology.

[2]  E. Mathiesen,et al.  Association between diastolic dysfunction and future atrial fibrillation in the Tromsø Study from 1994 to 2010 , 2015, Heart.

[3]  S. Solomon,et al.  Risk factors for atrial fibrillation in patients with normal versus dilated left atrium (from the Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities Study). , 2014, The American journal of cardiology.

[4]  G. Breithardt,et al.  Higher risk of death and stroke in patients with persistent vs. paroxysmal atrial fibrillation: results from the ROCKET-AF Trial , 2014, European heart journal.

[5]  Daniel R. Frisch,et al.  Clinical significance of atrial fibrillation detected by cardiac implantable electronic devices. , 2014, Heart rhythm.

[6]  C. Murray,et al.  Worldwide Epidemiology of Atrial Fibrillation: A Global Burden of Disease 2010 Study , 2014, Circulation.

[7]  J. Olgin,et al.  Incident Atrial Fibrillation Among Asians, Hispanics, Blacks, and Whites , 2013, Circulation.

[8]  O. Franco,et al.  Projections on the number of individuals with atrial fibrillation in the European Union, from 2000 to 2060. , 2013, European heart journal.

[9]  G. Lip,et al.  Recent developments in understanding epidemiology and risk determinants of atrial fibrillation as a cause of stroke. , 2013, The Canadian journal of cardiology.

[10]  Luca Segreti,et al.  Superior vena cava defibrillator coils make transvenous lead extraction more challenging and riskier. , 2013, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[11]  T. Chao,et al.  Sinus node dysfunction in atrial fibrillation patients: the evidence of regional atrial substrate remodelling. , 2013, Europace : European pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac electrophysiology : journal of the working groups on cardiac pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac cellular electrophysiology of the European Society of Cardiology.

[12]  J. Kalman,et al.  Sinus node dysfunction and atrial fibrillation: two sides of the same coin? , 2013, Europace : European pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac electrophysiology : journal of the working groups on cardiac pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac cellular electrophysiology of the European Society of Cardiology.

[13]  Mark A Hlatky,et al.  2012 ACCF/AHA/HRS focused update incorporated into the ACCF/AHA/HRS 2008 guidelines for device-based therapy of cardiac rhythm abnormalities: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines and the Heart Rhythm Society. , 2013, Circulation.

[14]  A. Capucci,et al.  Subclinical atrial fibrillation and the risk of stroke. , 2012, The New England journal of medicine.

[15]  G. Lamas,et al.  The Influence of Atrial and Ventricular Pacing on the Incidence of Atrial Fibrillation: A Meta‐Analysis , 2011, Pacing and clinical electrophysiology : PACE.

[16]  Jeroen J. Bax,et al.  Prediction of atrial fibrillation in patients with an implantable cardioverter‐defibrillator and heart failure , 2010, European journal of heart failure.

[17]  Dongfeng Qi,et al.  The Relationship Between Daily Atrial Tachyarrhythmia Burden From Implantable Device Diagnostics and Stroke Risk: The TRENDS Study , 2009, Circulation. Arrhythmia and electrophysiology.

[18]  D. Levy,et al.  Development of a risk score for atrial fibrillation (Framingham Heart Study): a community-based cohort study , 2009, The Lancet.

[19]  S. A. Christman,et al.  Frequency, duration, and predictors of newly-diagnosed atrial fibrillation following dual-chamber pacemaker implantation in patients without a previous history of atrial fibrillation. , 2008, The American journal of cardiology.

[20]  Richard B Devereux,et al.  Recommendations for chamber quantification: a report from the American Society of Echocardiography's Guidelines and Standards Committee and the Chamber Quantification Writing Group, developed in conjunction with the European Association of Echocardiography, a branch of the European Society of Cardio , 2005, Journal of the American Society of Echocardiography : official publication of the American Society of Echocardiography.

[21]  C. Israel,et al.  Long-term risk of recurrent atrial fibrillation as documented by an implantable monitoring device: implications for optimal patient care. , 2004, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[22]  G. Lip,et al.  Ethnicity in relation to atrial fibrillation and stroke (the West Birmingham Stroke Project). , 2003, The American journal of cardiology.

[23]  G. Lamas,et al.  Adverse Effect of Ventricular Pacing on Heart Failure and Atrial Fibrillation Among Patients With Normal Baseline QRS Duration in a Clinical Trial of Pacemaker Therapy for Sinus Node Dysfunction , 2003, Circulation.

[24]  G. Lamas,et al.  Atrial High Rate Episodes Detected by Pacemaker Diagnostics Predict Death and Stroke: Report of the Atrial Diagnostics Ancillary Study of the MOde Selection Trial (MOST) , 2003, Circulation.

[25]  S. Connolly,et al.  Progression to chronic atrial fibrillation after pacing: the Canadian Trial of Physiologic Pacing. CTOPP Investigators. , 2001, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[26]  D. Levy,et al.  Independent risk factors for atrial fibrillation in a population-based cohort. The Framingham Heart Study. , 1994, JAMA.

[27]  D. Levy,et al.  Survival After the Onset of Congestive Heart Failure in Framingham Heart Study Subjects , 1993, Circulation.

[28]  J. Clarke,et al.  Medicine , 1907, Bristol medico-chirurgical journal.