Two-sided confidence intervals for the single proportion: comparison of seven methods.

Simple interval estimate methods for proportions exhibit poor coverage and can produce evidently inappropriate intervals. Criteria appropriate to the evaluation of various proposed methods include: closeness of the achieved coverage probability to its nominal value; whether intervals are located too close to or too distant from the middle of the scale; expected interval width; avoidance of aberrations such as limits outside [0,1] or zero width intervals; and ease of use, whether by tables, software or formulae. Seven methods for the single proportion are evaluated on 96,000 parameter space points. Intervals based on tail areas and the simpler score methods are recommended for use. In each case, methods are available that aim to align either the minimum or the mean coverage with the nominal 1 -alpha.

[1]  R G Newcombe,et al.  Improved confidence intervals for the difference between binomial proportions based on paired data. , 1998, Statistics in medicine.

[2]  R. Newcombe,et al.  Interval estimation for the difference between independent proportions: comparison of eleven methods. , 1998, Statistics in medicine.

[3]  P. Armitage,et al.  Mid-P confidence intervals: a brief review , 1995 .

[4]  G R Cohen,et al.  Mid-P confidence intervals for the Poisson expectation. , 1994, Statistics in medicine.

[5]  S E Vollset,et al.  Confidence intervals for a binomial proportion. , 1994, Statistics in medicine.

[6]  K. Dolan,et al.  Prevalence of HIV infection among ex-prisoners in England. , 1992, BMJ.

[7]  I Russell,et al.  Statistics--with confidence? , 1991, The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners.

[8]  Douglas G. Altman,et al.  Practical statistics for medical research , 1990 .

[9]  L. M. Anderson.  Confidence Interval Analysis , 1990 .

[10]  Douglas G. Altman,et al.  Statistics with confidence: Confidence intervals and statistical guidelines . , 1990 .

[11]  J. Angus.  Confidence coefficient of approximate two‐sided confidence intervals for the binomial probability , 1987 .

[12]  M Nurminen,et al.  Comparative analysis of two rates. , 1985, Statistics in medicine.

[13]  J. Angus,et al.  Improved Confidence Statements for the Binomial Parameter , 1984 .

[14]  C. Blyth,et al.  Binomial Confidence Intervals , 1983 .

[15]  I. D. Hill,et al.  An Efficient and Portable Pseudo‐Random Number Generator , 1982 .

[16]  Yoritake Fujino,et al.  Approximate binomial confidence limits , 1980 .

[17]  B. K. Ghosh,et al.  A Comparison of Some Approximate Confidence Intervals for the Binomial Parameter , 1979 .

[18]  P. Bickel,et al.  Mathematical Statistics: Basic Ideas and Selected Topics , 1977 .

[19]  J. Fleiss,et al.  Statistical methods for rates and proportions , 1973 .

[20]  M. Graffar.  [Modern epidemiology]. , 1971, Bruxelles medical.

[21]  O. Miettinen.  Estimation of relative risk from individually matched series. , 1970, Biometrics.

[22]  M. Stone,et al.  The role of significance testing: some data with a message , 1969 .

[23]  John W. Pratt,et al.  A Normal Approximation for Binomial, F, Beta, and other Common, Related Tail Probabilities, II , 1968 .

[24]  D. J. Finney,et al.  Introduction to Probability and Statistics , 1968 .

[25]  T. W. Anderson,et al.  Approximating the Upper Binomial Confidence Limit , 1967 .

[26]  J. V. Rosenhead,et al.  The Advanced Theory of Statistics: Volume 2: Inference and Relationship , 1963 .

[27]  H. O. Lancaster.  The combination of probabilities arising from data in discrete distributions. , 1949, Biometrika.

[28]  F. Garwood,et al.  i) Fiducial Limits for the Poisson Distribution , 1936 .

[29]  E. S. Pearson,et al.  THE USE OF CONFIDENCE OR FIDUCIAL LIMITS ILLUSTRATED IN THE CASE OF THE BINOMIAL , 1934 .

[30]  E. B. Wilson.  Probable Inference, the Law of Succession, and Statistical Inference , 1927 .