Exploring the Practical Limits of Cooperative Awareness in Vehicular Communications

We perform an extensive study of cooperative awareness in vehicular networks based on periodic message exchange. We start by analyzing measurements collected on four test sites across Europe. To measure cooperative awareness, we use three metrics: 1) neighborhood awareness ratio, 2) ratio of neighbors above range, and 3) packet delivery rate. Using the collected data, we define a simple model for calculating neighborhood awareness given a packet delivery ratio for an environment. Finally, we perform realistic large-scale simulations to explore the achievable performance of cooperative awareness under realistic transmit power and transmit rate constraints. Our measurements and simulation results show the following: 1) Above a certain threshold, there is little benefit in increasing the cooperative message rate to improve awareness; higher transmit power and fewer message transmissions are a better approach, since message delivery is dominated by shadowing; 2) The efficacy of cooperative awareness varies greatly in different environments on both large scale (e.g., 90% awareness is achievable up to 200 m in urban compared to 500 m in highway) and small scale (e.g., vehicles in nearby streets can have significantly different awareness levels); 3) Vehicle-to-vehicle (V2V) and vehicle-to-infrastructure (V2I) communications have distinct awareness patterns; 4) Each location has distinct transmit power that achieves high awareness; 5) Achieving high awareness levels results in increased reception of potentially unwanted messages; therefore, a balance needs to be found between awareness and interference, depending on the specific context. We hope that our results will serve as a starting point for designing more effective periodic message exchange services for cooperative awareness.

[1]  Fan Bai,et al.  Reliability Analysis of DSRC Wireless Communication for Vehicle Safety Applications , 2006, 2006 IEEE Intelligent Transportation Systems Conference.

[2]  Kishor S. Trivedi,et al.  Performance and Reliability Evaluation of BSM Broadcasting in DSRC with Multi-Channel Schemes , 2014, IEEE Transactions on Computers.

[3]  Mate Boban,et al.  TVR—Tall Vehicle Relaying in Vehicular Networks , 2014, IEEE Transactions on Mobile Computing.

[4]  Hannes Hartenstein,et al.  VANET: Is 95% probability of packet reception safe? , 2011, 2011 11th International Conference on ITS Telecommunications.

[5]  Ozan K. Tonguz,et al.  Stereoscopic aerial photography: an alternative to model-based urban mobility approaches , 2009, VANET '09.

[6]  Fabian de Ponte Müller,et al.  Performance of CAM based safety applications using ITS-G5A MAC in high dense scenarios , 2011, 2011 IEEE Intelligent Vehicles Symposium (IV).

[7]  Ozan K. Tonguz,et al.  How Shadowing Hurts Vehicular Communications and How Dynamic Beaconing Can Help , 2013, IEEE Transactions on Mobile Computing.

[8]  Paolo Santi,et al.  A measurement-based study of beaconing performance in IEEE 802.11p vehicular networks , 2012, 2012 Proceedings IEEE INFOCOM.

[9]  Amardeo Sarma,et al.  CAR-2-X Communication for Safety and Infotainment in Europe , 2008 .

[10]  Filippo Visintainer,et al.  Cooperative Systems in Motorway Environment: The Example of Trento Test Site in Italy , 2013 .

[11]  Stephen Graham Ritchie,et al.  TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH. PART C, EMERGING TECHNOLOGIES , 1993 .

[12]  Daniel Krajzewicz,et al.  Recent Development and Applications of SUMO - Simulation of Urban MObility , 2012 .

[13]  Luca Delgrossi,et al.  IEEE 802.11p: Towards an International Standard for Wireless Access in Vehicular Environments , 2008, VTC Spring 2008 - IEEE Vehicular Technology Conference.

[14]  Mate Boban,et al.  ECPR: Environment-and context-aware combined power and rate distributed congestion control for vehicular communications , 2015, Comput. Commun..

[15]  Mate Boban,et al.  Modeling vehicle-to-vehicle line of sight channels and its impact on application-layer performance , 2013, Vehicular Ad Hoc Networks.

[16]  Mate Boban,et al.  Geometry-Based Vehicle-to-Vehicle Channel Modeling for Large-Scale Simulation , 2013, IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology.

[17]  Cristina Rico-Garcia,et al.  Update Delay: A new information-centric metric for a combined communication and application level reliability evaluation of CAM based Safety Applications , 2012 .

[18]  N. Czink,et al.  Average Downstream Performance of Measured IEEE 802.11p Infrastructure-to-Vehicle Links , 2010, 2010 IEEE International Conference on Communications Workshops.

[19]  H. Noori,et al.  A novel study on beaconing for VANET-based vehicle to vehicle communication: Probability of beacon delivery in realistic large-scale urban area using 802.11p , 2013, 2013 International Conference on Smart Communications in Network Technologies (SaCoNeT).

[20]  José Santa,et al.  Experimental Evaluation of CAM and DENM Messaging Services in Vehicular Communications , 2014 .

[21]  Pedro M. d'Orey,et al.  Empirical Evaluation of Cooperative Awareness in Vehicular Communications , 2014, 2014 IEEE 79th Vehicular Technology Conference (VTC Spring).

[22]  Fredrik Tufvesson,et al.  Measurement based Shadow Fading Model for Vehicle-to-Vehicle Network Simulations , 2012, ArXiv.

[23]  Tim Leinmüller,et al.  Exploration of adaptive beaconing for efficient intervehicle safety communication , 2010, IEEE Network.

[24]  John B. Kenney,et al.  Dedicated Short-Range Communications (DSRC) Standards in the United States , 2011, Proceedings of the IEEE.

[25]  Stephan Sand,et al.  Random Transmit Power Control for DSRC and its Application to Cooperative Safety , 2016, IEEE Transactions on Dependable and Secure Computing.

[26]  Hannes Hartenstein,et al.  A comparison of single- and multi-hop beaconing in VANETs , 2009, VANET '09.

[27]  Fan Bai,et al.  Toward understanding characteristics of dedicated short range communications (DSRC) from a perspective of vehicular network engineers , 2010, MobiCom.

[28]  Georgios Karagiannis,et al.  Exploring the solution space of beaconing in VANETs , 2009, 2009 IEEE Vehicular Networking Conference (VNC).

[29]  Bernhard Kloiber,et al.  Dice the TX power — Improving Awareness Quality in VANETs by random transmit power selection , 2012, 2012 IEEE Vehicular Networking Conference (VNC).

[30]  Mate Boban,et al.  Measurement-based evaluation of cooperative awareness for V2V and V2I communication , 2014, 2014 IEEE Vehicular Networking Conference (VNC).

[31]  Hannes Hartenstein,et al.  Joint power/rate congestion control optimizing packet reception in vehicle safety communications , 2013, Vehicular Ad Hoc Networks.