Multidimensional Connectivity: Benefits, Risks, and Policy Implications for Europe and Central Asia

How large are government spending and tax multipliers? The fiscal proxy- SVAR literature provides heterogenous estimates, depending on which proxies - fiscal or non-fiscal - are used to identify fiscal shocks. We reconcile the existing estimates via a flexible vector autoregressive model that allows to achieve identification in presence of a number of structural shocks larger than that of the available instruments. Our two main findings are the following. First, the estimate of the tax multiplier is sensitive to the assumption of orthogonality between total factor productivity (non-fiscal proxy) and tax shocks. If this correlation is assumed to be zero, the tax multiplier is found to be around one. If such correlation is non-zero, as supported by our empirical evidence, we find a tax multiplier three times as large. Second, we find the spending multiplier to be robustly larger than one across different models that feature different sets of instruments. Our results are robust to the joint employment of different fiscal and non-fiscal instruments.

[1]  C. Evans.  Productivity shocks and real business cycles , 1992 .

[2]  E. Leeper.  Equilibria under ‘active’ and ‘passive’ monetary and fiscal policies , 1991 .

[3]  Claude Giorno,et al.  Estimating Potential Output, Output Gaps and Structural Budget Balances , 1995 .

[4]  C. Sims,et al.  What Does Monetary Policy Do , 1996 .

[5]  James D. Hamilton.  What is an Oil Shock? , 2000 .

[6]  Harald Uhlig,et al.  What are the Effects of Fiscal Policy Shocks? , 2002 .

[7]  D. Romer,et al.  The Macroeconomic Effects of Tax Changes: Estimates Based on a New Measure of Fiscal Shocks , 2007 .

[8]  Helmut Ltkepohl,et al.  New Introduction to Multiple Time Series Analysis , 2007 .

[9]  Daniel F. Waggoner,et al.  Structural Vector Autoregressions: Theory of Identification and Algorithms for Inference , 2008 .

[10]  Karel Mertens,et al.  Empirical Evidence on the Aggregate Effects of Anticipated and Unanticipated U.S. Tax Policy Shocks , 2009 .

[11]  V. Ramey,et al.  Identifying Government Spending Shocks: It&Apos;S All in the Timing , 2009 .

[12]  Byron F. Lutz,et al.  Fiscal Policy in the United States: Automatic Stabilizers, Discretionary Fiscal Policy Actions, and the Economy , 2010 .

[13]  Macroeconomic Effects from Government Purchases and Taxes , 2010 .

[14]  Jonas D. M. Fisher,et al.  Using Stock Returns to Identify Government Spending Shocks , 2009 .

[15]  Byron F. Lutz,et al.  Fiscal policy in the United States: automatic stabilizers, discretionary fiscal policy actions, and the economy , 2010 .

[16]  R. Chahrour,et al.  A Model-Based Evaluation of the Debate on the Size of the Tax Multiplier , 2010 .

[17]  F. Giavazzi,et al.  Measuring Tax Multipliers: The Narrative Method in Fiscal VARs † , 2012 .

[18]  Ruediger Bachmann,et al.  Confidence and the Transmission of Government Spending Shocks , 2011 .

[19]  Luca Gambetti,et al.  Sufficient information in structural VARs , 2014 .

[20]  Todd B. Walker,et al.  Clearing Up the Fiscal Multiplier Morass , 2011 .

[21]  Lawrence J. Christiano,et al.  When Is the Government Spending Multiplier Large? , 2009, Journal of Political Economy.

[22]  Christophe Kamps,et al.  Divisions of Research & Statistics and Monetary Affairs Federal Reserve Board , Washington , D . C . The Analytics of SVARs : A Unified Framework to Measure Fiscal Multipliers , 2012 .

[23]  Mark W. Watson,et al.  Disentangling the Channels of the 2007-2009 Recession , 2012 .

[24]  John G. Fernald.  A quarterly, utilization-adjusted series on total factor productivity , 2012 .

[25]  Yuriy Gorodnichenko,et al.  Output Spillovers from Fiscal Policy , 2012 .

[26]  Daniel F. Waggoner,et al.  FEDERAL RESERVE BANK o f ATLANTA WORKING PAPER SERIES Inference Based on SVARs Identified with Sign and Zero Restrictions : Theory and Applications , 2013 .

[27]  Mario Forni,et al.  Government Spending Shocks in Open Economy VARs , 2014 .

[28]  Efrem Castelnuovo,et al.  Estimating Fiscal Multipliers: News from a Nonlinear World , 2014 .

[29]  G. Ricco.  A New Identification of Fiscal Shocks Based on the Information Flow , 2015 .

[30]  Evi Pappa,et al.  Chronicle of a War Foretold: The Macroeconomic Effects of Anticipated Defence Spending Shocks , 2014 .

[31]  M. Universit.  Government Spending Multiplier , 2014 .

[32]  Serena Ng,et al.  Working Paper Series , 2019 .

[33]  James H. Stock,et al.  Identification and Estimation of Dynamic Causal Effects in Macroeconomics Using External Instruments , 2018 .

[34]  Xu Zhang.  A New Measure of Monetary Policy Shocks , 2018 .

[35]  V. Ramey,et al.  Government Spending Multipliers in Good Times and in Bad: Evidence from US Historical Data , 2014, Journal of Political Economy.

[36]  Owen M. Zidar.  Tax Cuts for Whom? Heterogeneous Effects of Income Tax Changes on Growth and Employment , 2013, Journal of Political Economy.

[37]  L. Fanelli,et al.  Exogenous uncertainty and the identification of structural vector autoregressions with external instruments , 2019, Journal of Applied Econometrics.

[38]  The Dynamic Effects of Personal and Corporate Income Tax Changes in the United States: Reply to Jentsch and Lunsford , 2018, Federal Reserve Bank of Dallas, Working Papers.

[39]  C. Jentsch,et al.  Asymptotically Valid Bootstrap Inference for Proxy SVARs , 2019, Working paper (Federal Reserve Bank of Cleveland).

[40]  C. Jentsch,et al.  The Dynamic Effects of Personal and Corporate Income Tax Changes in the United States: Comment , 2019, American Economic Review.

[41]  V. Ramey.  Ten Years after the Financial Crisis: What Have We Learned from the Renaissance in Fiscal Research? , 2019, Journal of Economic Perspectives.

[42]  Mishel Ghassibe,et al.  State Dependence of Fiscal Multipliers: The Source of Fluctuations Matters , 2020, SSRN Electronic Journal.

[43]  Christian K. Wolf,et al.  Online Appendix for: Local Projections and VARs Estimate the Same Impulse Responses , 2019 .