Network structure influences the strength of learned neural representations

Human experience is built upon sequences of discrete events. From those sequences, humans build impressively accurate models of their world. This process has been referred to as graph learning, a form of structure learning in which the mental model encodes the graph of event-to-event transition probabilities [1], [2], typically in medial temporal cortex [3]–[6]. Recent evidence suggests that some network structures are easier to learn than others [7]–[9], but the neural properties of this effect remain unknown. Here we use fMRI to show that the network structure of a temporal sequence of stimuli influences the fidelity with which those stimuli are represented in the brain. Healthy adult human participants learned a set of stimulus-motor associations following one of two graph structures. The design of our experiment allowed us to separate regional sensitivity to the structural, stimulus, and motor response components of the task. As expected, whereas the motor response could be decoded from neural representations in postcentral gyrus, the shape of the stimulus could be decoded from lateral occipital cortex. The structure of the graph impacted the nature of neural representations: when the graph was modular as opposed to lattice-like, BOLD representations in visual areas better predicted trial identity in a held-out run and displayed higher intrinsic dimensionality. Our results demonstrate that even over relatively short timescales, graph structure determines the fidelity of event representations as well as the dimensionality of the space in which those representations are encoded. More broadly, our study shows that network context influences the strength of learned neural representations, motivating future work in the design, optimization, and adaptation of network contexts for distinct types of learning over different timescales.

[1]  R. Werner,et al.  Gender Disparity in Citations in High-Impact Journal Articles , 2021, JAMA network open.

[2]  Elisabeth A. Karuza,et al.  The Value of Statistical Learning to Cognitive Network Science , 2021, Top. Cogn. Sci..

[3]  Maxwell A. Bertolero,et al.  Racial and ethnic imbalance in neuroscience reference lists and intersections with gender , 2020, bioRxiv.

[4]  Jordan D Dworkin,et al.  Gendered Citation Practices in the Field of Communication , 2020 .

[5]  Jacqueline M. Fulvio,et al.  Gender (im)balance in citation practices in cognitive neuroscience , 2020, bioRxiv.

[6]  Eli J. Cornblath,et al.  Gender Diversity Statement and Code Notebook v1.0 , 2020 .

[7]  Kristin A. Linn,et al.  The extent and drivers of gender imbalance in neuroscience reference lists , 2020, Nature Neuroscience.

[8]  Danielle S. Bassett,et al.  Graph learning: How humans infer and represent networks , 2019 .

[9]  Lindsay E. Hunter,et al.  Humans can navigate complex graph structures acquired during latent learning , 2019, Cognition.

[10]  D. Bassett,et al.  Effective learning is accompanied by high-dimensional and efficient representations of neural activity , 2019, Nature Neuroscience.

[11]  Jean M. Vettel,et al.  Functional brain network architecture supporting the learning of social networks in humans , 2019, NeuroImage.

[12]  Danielle S. Bassett,et al.  Human information processing in complex networks , 2019, Nature Physics.

[13]  Danielle S. Bassett,et al.  Human Sensitivity to Community Structure Is Robust to Topological Variation , 2019, Complex..

[14]  Michelle L. Dion,et al.  Gendered Citation Patterns across Political Science and Social Science Methodology Fields , 2018, Political Analysis.

[15]  Ari E. Kahn,et al.  Abstract representations of events arise from mental errors in learning and memory , 2018, Nature Communications.

[16]  Sangil Lee,et al.  Simple but robust improvement in multivoxel pattern classification , 2018, bioRxiv.

[17]  Satrajit S. Ghosh,et al.  FMRIPrep: a robust preprocessing pipeline for functional MRI , 2018, bioRxiv.

[18]  Gaurav Sood,et al.  Predicting Race and Ethnicity From the Sequence of Characters in a Name , 2018, 1805.02109.

[19]  Anders M. Dale,et al.  The Adolescent Brain Cognitive Development (ABCD) study: Imaging acquisition across 21 sites , 2018, Developmental Cognitive Neuroscience.

[20]  Jörn Diedrichsen,et al.  The Role of Human Primary Motor Cortex in the Production of Skilled Finger Sequences , 2018, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[21]  Russell A. Epstein,et al.  Adaptation decorrelates shape representations , 2018, bioRxiv.

[22]  J. Saffran,et al.  Infant Statistical Learning , 2018, Annual review of psychology.

[23]  Sabine Hunnius,et al.  Infants’ Motor Proficiency and Statistical Learning for Actions , 2017, Front. Psychol..

[24]  Danielle S Bassett,et al.  Network constraints on learnability of probabilistic motor sequences , 2017, Nature Human Behaviour.

[25]  Danielle S Bassett,et al.  Individual Differences in Learning Social and Nonsocial Network Structures , 2017, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[26]  Kimberly L. Stachenfeld,et al.  The hippocampus as a predictive map , 2017, Nature Neuroscience.

[27]  Raymond J Dolan,et al.  A map of abstract relational knowledge in the human hippocampal–entorhinal cortex , 2017, eLife.

[28]  Danielle S Bassett,et al.  Process reveals structure: How a network is traversed mediates expectations about its architecture , 2017, Scientific Reports.

[29]  Satrajit S. Ghosh,et al.  Mindboggling morphometry of human brains , 2016, bioRxiv.

[30]  Yuan Chang Leong,et al.  Shared memories reveal shared structure in neural activity across individuals , 2016, Nature Neuroscience.

[31]  Neven Caplar,et al.  Quantitative evaluation of gender bias in astronomical publications from citation counts , 2016, Nature Astronomy.

[32]  Sharon L. Thompson-Schill,et al.  Local Patterns to Global Architectures: Influences of Network Topology on Human Learning Relating Two Approaches Complex Networks Are Pervasive Network Topology Influences Learning and Memory Local Statistics Underpin Network Architecture , 2022 .

[33]  Joshua B Tenenbaum,et al.  Toward the neural implementation of structure learning , 2016, Current Opinion in Neurobiology.

[34]  M. Botvinick,et al.  Statistical learning of temporal community structure in the hippocampus , 2016, Hippocampus.

[35]  J. Diedrichsen,et al.  Hand use predicts the structure of representations in sensorimotor cortex , 2015, Nature Neuroscience.

[36]  J. Ristic,et al.  Social event segmentation , 2015, Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.

[37]  Guohua Shen,et al.  Decoding the individual finger movements from single‐trial functional magnetic resonance imaging recordings of human brain activity , 2014, The European journal of neuroscience.

[38]  Li Su,et al.  A Toolbox for Representational Similarity Analysis , 2014, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[39]  Michael Eickenberg,et al.  Machine learning for neuroimaging with scikit-learn , 2014, Front. Neuroinform..

[40]  Timothy O. Laumann,et al.  Methods to detect, characterize, and remove motion artifact in resting state fMRI , 2014, NeuroImage.

[41]  S. Mitchell,et al.  Gendered Citation Patterns in International Relations Journals , 2013 .

[42]  Barbara F. Walter,et al.  The Gender Citation Gap in International Relations , 2013, International Organization.

[43]  Xiao-Jing Wang,et al.  The importance of mixed selectivity in complex cognitive tasks , 2013, Nature.

[44]  M. Botvinick,et al.  Neural representations of events arise from temporal community structure , 2013, Nature Neuroscience.

[45]  Simon B. Eickhoff,et al.  An improved framework for confound regression and filtering for control of motion artifact in the preprocessing of resting-state functional connectivity data , 2013, NeuroImage.

[46]  D. Louis Collins,et al.  Brain templates and atlases , 2012, NeuroImage.

[47]  E. Newport,et al.  Science Current Directions in Psychological Statistical Learning : from Acquiring Specific Items to Forming General Rules on Behalf Of: Association for Psychological Science , 2022 .

[48]  Russell A. Poldrack,et al.  Deconvolving BOLD activation in event-related designs for multivoxel pattern classification analyses , 2012, NeuroImage.

[49]  Satrajit S. Ghosh,et al.  Nipype: A Flexible, Lightweight and Extensible Neuroimaging Data Processing Framework in Python , 2011, Front. Neuroinform..

[50]  Brian B. Avants,et al.  N4ITK: Improved N3 Bias Correction , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[51]  Y. Niv,et al.  Learning latent structure: carving nature at its joints , 2010, Current Opinion in Neurobiology.

[52]  L. Davachi,et al.  Distortion and Signal Loss in Medial Temporal Lobe , 2009, PloS one.

[53]  Bruce Fischl,et al.  Accurate and robust brain image alignment using boundary-based registration , 2009, NeuroImage.

[54]  G. Aguirre,et al.  Different spatial scales of shape similarity representation in lateral and ventral LOC. , 2009, Cerebral cortex.

[55]  C. Almli,et al.  Unbiased nonlinear average age-appropriate brain templates from birth to adulthood , 2009, NeuroImage.

[56]  Steven Skiena,et al.  Name-ethnicity classification from open sources , 2009, KDD.

[57]  Jessica F. Hay,et al.  Statistical learning in a natural language by 8-month-old infants. , 2009, Child development.

[58]  André J. W. van der Kouwe,et al.  Brain morphometry with multiecho MPRAGE , 2008, NeuroImage.

[59]  Valentin Dragoi,et al.  Adaptive coding of visual information in neural populations , 2008, Nature.

[60]  Brian B. Avants,et al.  Symmetric diffeomorphic image registration with cross-correlation: Evaluating automated labeling of elderly and neurodegenerative brain , 2008, Medical Image Anal..

[61]  M. Webster,et al.  Visual adaptation: Neural, psychological and computational aspects , 2007, Vision Research.

[62]  Thomas T. Liu,et al.  A component based noise correction method (CompCor) for BOLD and perfusion based fMRI , 2007, NeuroImage.

[63]  E. Newport,et al.  Learning at a distance I. Statistical learning of non-adjacent dependencies , 2004, Cognitive Psychology.

[64]  Maria V. Sanchez-Vives,et al.  Adaptation and temporal decorrelation by single neurons in the primary visual cortex. , 2003, Journal of neurophysiology.

[65]  Michael Brady,et al.  Improved Optimization for the Robust and Accurate Linear Registration and Motion Correction of Brain Images , 2002, NeuroImage.

[66]  R. Gómez Variability and Detection of Invariant Structure , 2002, Psychological science.

[67]  Robin M Heidemann,et al.  Generalized autocalibrating partially parallel acquisitions (GRAPPA) , 2002, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[68]  Scott P. Johnson,et al.  Visual statistical learning in infancy: evidence for a domain general learning mechanism , 2002, Cognition.

[69]  F A Jolesz,et al.  Optimized single-slab three-dimensional spin-echo MR imaging of the brain. , 2000, Radiology.

[70]  Elizabeth K. Johnson,et al.  Statistical learning of tone sequences by human infants and adults , 1999, Cognition.

[71]  Anders M. Dale,et al.  Cortical Surface-Based Analysis I. Segmentation and Surface Reconstruction , 1999, NeuroImage.

[72]  R W Cox,et al.  Software tools for analysis and visualization of fMRI data , 1997, NMR in biomedicine.

[73]  R N Aslin,et al.  Statistical Learning by 8-Month-Old Infants , 1996, Science.

[74]  E. Newport,et al.  WORD SEGMENTATION : THE ROLE OF DISTRIBUTIONAL CUES , 1996 .

[75]  Skipper Seabold,et al.  Statsmodels: Econometric and Statistical Modeling with Python , 2010, SciPy.

[76]  Stephen M. Smith,et al.  Segmentation of brain MR images through a hidden Markov random field model and the expectation-maximization algorithm , 2001, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[77]  C. Lanczos Evaluation of Noisy Data , 1964 .