Effect of shade and thermo-mechanical viscosity stimulation methods on the rheological properties of nanohybrid resin composite

Abstract The aim of the present study is to measure the rheological properties of nanohybrid resin composite of three shades in pre-polymerized phase using different thermomechanical stimulations. Nanohybrid composite (Kerr Herculite XRV Ultra) in enamel, dentin, and incisal shades was included. Rheological measurements were made with a rotational rheometer in dynamic oscillation mode using three methods: (a) Strain Sweep test explored a range of deformation γ0 from 0.025 to 3% with a frequency ω = 1 Hz (temperature set at 25 and 65 °C), (b) Frequency Sweep test explored frequencies between 1 and 100 rad/s applying a deformation γ0 = 0.5% (temperature set at 25; 45; 65 °C), and (c) Ramp Temperature test explored a heating phase from 25 to 75 °C then a cooling phase back to 25 °C applying a γ0 = 0.5% and a ω = 10 rad/s. Data were analyzed using a three-way ANOVA and Tukey’s test (α = 0.05). Viscosity measurement (p < 0.05) and shade of the composites (p < 0.05) significantly affected the results. Viscosity turned out to be subordinate to strain amplitude, frequency, temperature, and axial force applied during each test. Enamel shade was the most viscous whereas dentin shade was 8% less viscous (p < 0.05). The incisal shade was significantly less viscous (70%) than enamel (p < 0.05). Pre-heating decreased viscosity of incisal shade (30%) above 50 °C but this value was 90 and 98%, respectively, for strain and frequency sweep test. Preheating had a side effect as in the cooling phase, viscosity increased from 66 to 450% exceeding the value recorded at the beginning of the test. Preheating was not effective to reduce viscosity, and may reveal some side effects. The composite tested might not be pre-heated above 45 °C.

[1]  D. Watts,et al.  Rheological properties of resin composites according to variations in composition and temperature. , 2014, Dental materials : official publication of the Academy of Dental Materials.

[2]  C. Bailly,et al.  Physical, mechanical and rheological characterization of resin-based pit and fissure sealants compared to flowable resin composites. , 2012, Dental materials : official publication of the Academy of Dental Materials.

[3]  M. Ozcan,et al.  Radiopacity of different resin-based and conventional luting cements compared to human and bovine teeth. , 2012, Dental materials journal.

[4]  Y. Kawano,et al.  Composite pre-heating: effects on marginal adaptation, degree of conversion and mechanical properties. , 2010, Dental materials : official publication of the Academy of Dental Materials.

[5]  E. Gherlone,et al.  Degree of conversion of three composite materials employed in the adhesive cementation of indirect restorations: a micro-Raman analysis. , 2009, Journal of dentistry.

[6]  I. Alessandri,et al.  Indirect resin composite restorations: evaluation of polymerization of luting agents by means of micro-Raman spectrophotometry. , 2009, Minerva Stomatologica.

[7]  J. Ferracane,et al.  Slumping resistance and viscoelasticity prior to setting of dental composites. , 2008, Dental materials : official publication of the Academy of Dental Materials.

[8]  M. Aksu,et al.  Effect of pre-heating resin composite on restoration microleakage. , 2008, Operative dentistry.

[9]  In-bog Lee,et al.  Rheological characterization of composites using a vertical oscillation rheometer. , 2004, Dental materials : official publication of the Academy of Dental Materials.

[10]  S. Ban,et al.  Effect of filler properties in composite resins on light transmittance characteristics and color. , 2007, Dental materials journal.

[11]  In-bog Lee,et al.  Rheological properties of resin composites according to variations in monomer and filler composition. , 2006, Dental materials : official publication of the Academy of Dental Materials.

[12]  In-bog Lee,et al.  Rheologic properties of flowable, conventional hybrid, and condensable composite resins. , 2003, Dental materials : official publication of the Academy of Dental Materials.

[13]  B. Lim,et al.  Effect of surface conditions on the color of dental resin composites. , 2002, Journal of biomedical materials research.

[14]  J. Y. Thompson,et al.  A characterization of first-generation flowable composites. , 1998, Journal of the American Dental Association.

[15]  K. Leinfelder,et al.  A new condensable composite for the restoration of posterior teeth. , 1998, Dentistry today.

[16]  N. Opdam,et al.  Consistency of resin composites for posterior use. , 1996, Dental materials : official publication of the Academy of Dental Materials.

[17]  Um Cm,et al.  Color differences between resin composites and shade guides. , 1996 .

[18]  C. Um,et al.  Color differences between resin composites and shade guides. , 1996, Quintessence international.

[19]  D. Kee,et al.  Rheological properties of structured fluids , 1994 .

[20]  J. Ferracane,et al.  Rheology of Composite Restoratives , 1981, Journal of dental research.

[21]  R. G. Craig,et al.  Viscoelastic and Dynamic Properties of Soft Liners and Tissue Conditioners , 1979, Journal of dental research.

[22]  P. Jacobsen,et al.  Viscosity of setting anterior restorative materials , 1977, British Dental Journal.