Relative safety factors against global buckling, anchorage rotation, and tissue rupture in wheat.

The objective of this study was to quantify the effect of specific physical and biological factors on the relative likelihood of biomechanical failure in wheat. Wind-related crop damage is a major obstacle to wheat production that costs several billion dollars per year. The four factors varied in this study were breeding line, dwarfing gene dose, soil type, and fertilization. A theoretical model describing the dynamic structural response of living plants was used to define margins of safety against global buckling, anchorage rotation, and tissue rupture. These relative safety factors were defined for each treatment in comparison with a tall wheat variety selected from a breeding line called Seri and grown in sandy soil with low fertilization. Compared to this reference, the relative safety factor against global buckling was increased (+39%, p<0.01), and the relative safety factor against anchorage rotation was decreased (-11%, p<0.025), by one allele of the dwarfing gene. The relative safety factor against tissue rupture was unaffected by the dwarfing gene but was consistently lower (-26%, p<0.01) in a second breeding line called Kauz. Soil type and fertility did not affect the relative safety factors and this negative finding was significant at p<0.05. The key finding was that the strength of wheat was affected more by genetic rather than by environmental factors, which suggests that some varieties are intrinsically more robust than others. Also, the relative safety factor against anchorage rotation was inversely proportional to the relative safety factor against buckling, which suggests that there are competing constraints on the dynamic structural behavior of wheat.

[1]  T. Farquhar,et al.  The Kinematics of Wheat Struck by a Wind Gust , 2000 .

[2]  P. R. Hobbs,et al.  Increasing Wheat Yields Sustainably through Agronomic Means , 1998 .

[3]  R. A. Fischer,et al.  Lodging effects on high-yielding crops of irrigated semidwarf wheat , 1987 .

[4]  M. Gent,et al.  Physiological and Agronomic Consequences of Rht Genes in Wheat , 1997 .

[5]  Karl J. Niklas,et al.  Plant Biomechanics: An Engineering Approach to Plant Form and Function , 1993 .

[6]  L. Brazier ON THE FLEXURE OF THIN CYLINDRICAL SHELLS AND OTHER SECTION , 1927 .

[7]  K. Niklas,et al.  Biomechanical and morphometric differences in Triticum aestivum seedlings differing in Rht gene dosage. , 1990 .

[8]  Effect of aeroelasticity on the aerodynamics of wheat , 1999 .

[9]  Christopher Baker,et al.  The development of a theoretical model for the windthrow of plants , 1995 .

[10]  T. Speck,et al.  Local buckling and other modes of failure in hollow plant stems , 1994 .

[11]  J. Zadoks A decimal code for the growth stages of cereals , 1974 .

[12]  A. R. Ennos,et al.  Stem and root characteristics associated with lodging resistance in four winter wheat cultivars , 1994, The Journal of Agricultural Science.

[13]  R. Hammerschmidt,et al.  Induced Resistance to Disease in Plants , 1995, Developments in Plant Pathology.

[14]  J. Zebrowski Dynamic behaviour of inflorescence-bearing Triticale and Triticum stems , 1999, Planta.

[15]  U. Steiner,et al.  Induced Disease Resistance in Monocots , 1995 .

[16]  K. Schulgasser,et al.  On the strength, stiffness and stability of tubular plant stems and leaves , 1992 .

[17]  Th. Speck,et al.  Contributions to the biomechanics of plants. I. Stabilities of plant stems with strengthening elements of different cross-sections against weight and wind forces. , 1990 .

[18]  A. R. Ennos,et al.  The Mechanics of Root Lodging in Winter Wheat, Triticum aestivum L. , 1993 .

[19]  Karl J. Niklas,et al.  FLEXURAL STIFFNESS AND MODULUS OF ELASTICITY OF FLOWER STALKS FROM ALLIUM SATIVUM AS MEASURED BY MULTIPLE RESONANCE FREQUENCY SPECTRA , 1988 .

[20]  Stephen P. Timoshenko,et al.  Vibration problems in engineering , 1928 .

[21]  Flexural Stiffness and Modulus of Elasticity of Flower Stalks from Allium Stalks from Allium sativum as Measured by Multiple Resonance Frequency Spectra , 1988 .

[22]  R. Allan Agronomic Comparisons Between Rht1 and Rht2 Semidwarf Genes in Winter Wheat , 1989 .