Advance order strategies: Effects on competition structure in a two-echelon supply chain

Abstract This paper considers advance order strategies in a two-echelon supply chain with one supplier and multiple buyers for seasonal products. We study how advance strategies affect the interactions between the supply chain members. In contrast to much of the literature, we specifically consider the supply chain with multiple buyers by introducing a demand function under uncertainty. Furthermore, we present two main different advance order strategies. We assume that exactly one of the multiple buyers has the ability to make an advance order before the selling season (we call this buyer the natural leader). In one strategy, the natural leader can only order products one time. The model shows that, below a threshold level of demand uncertainty, the supplier can benefit from providing adequate pricing incentives to entice the natural leader to order products before demand information is revealed. In another one, the natural leader can order products two times, we find that the supplier always can gain more profit from this advance order strategy. Our results show that the first advance order strategy is easier to control but has more strict constraint on coefficients of variation, while both two advance strategies bring more flexibility to the supply chain.

[1]  A. Federgruen,et al.  Dynamic inventory and pricing models for competing retailers , 2004 .

[2]  Evan L. Porteus,et al.  Selling to the Newsvendor: An Analysis of Price-Only Contracts , 2001, Manuf. Serv. Oper. Manag..

[3]  Nils Rudi,et al.  Who Benefits from Transshipment? Exogenous vs. Endogenous Wholesale Prices , 2004, Manag. Sci..

[4]  Gérard P. Cachon Supply Chain Coordination with Contracts , 2003, Supply Chain Management.

[5]  Kumar Rajaram,et al.  The Benefits of Advance Booking Discount Programs: Model and Analysis , 2004, Manag. Sci..

[6]  Gérard P. Cachon Stock Wars: Inventory Competition in a Two-Echelon Supply Chain with Multiple Retailers , 2001, Oper. Res..

[7]  Erica L. Plambeck,et al.  Sell the Plant? The Impact of Contract Manufacturing on Innovation, Capacity, and Profitability , 2005, Manag. Sci..

[8]  Yunzeng Wang,et al.  Revenue‐Sharing vs. Wholesale‐Price Contracts in Assembly Systems with Random Demand , 2004 .

[9]  J. Brander,et al.  Pre-commitment and flexibility: Applications to oligopoly theory , 1992 .

[10]  Z. Kevin Weng Coordinating order quantities between the manufacturer and the buyer: A generalized newsvendor model , 2004, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[11]  David F. Pyke,et al.  Inventory management and production planning and scheduling , 1998 .

[12]  Georgia Perakis,et al.  The Price of Anarchy in Supply Chains: Quantifying the Efficiency of Price-Only Contracts , 2007, Manag. Sci..

[13]  Gérard P. Cachon The Allocation of Inventory Risk in a Supply Chain: Push, Pull, and Advance - Purchase Discount Contracts , 2004, Manag. Sci..

[14]  Stephen M. Gilbert,et al.  Implications of Channel Structure for Leasing or Selling Durable Goods , 2009, Mark. Sci..

[15]  M. Khouja The single-period (news-vendor) problem: literature review and suggestions for future research , 1999 .

[16]  Stephen M. Gilbert,et al.  Strategic commitment versus postponement in a two-tier supply chain , 2002, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[17]  Uday S. Karmarkar,et al.  Competition and Structure in Serial Supply Chains with Deterministic Demand , 2001, Manag. Sci..

[18]  K. Donohue Efficient Supply Contracts for Fashion Goods with Forecast Updating and Two Production Modes , 2000 .

[19]  Clement Chow Kong-wing Pre-commitment vs. flexibility: Uncertainty and distribution reform in P.R. China , 1997 .

[20]  Yigal Gerchak,et al.  Capacity Games in Assembly Systems with Uncertain Demand , 2003, Manuf. Serv. Oper. Manag..

[21]  Fernando Bernstein,et al.  Decentralized Supply Chains with Competing Retailers Under Demand Uncertainty , 2005, Manag. Sci..

[22]  Jianghua Wu,et al.  Quantity flexibility contracts under Bayesian updating , 2005, Comput. Oper. Res..