Evaluation of JPEG 2000 encoder options: human and model observer detection of variable signals in X-ray coronary angiograms

Previous studies have evaluated the effect of the new still image compression standard JPEG 2000 using nontask based image quality metrics, i.e., peak-signal-to-noise-ratio (PSNR) for nonmedical images. In this paper, the effect of JPEG 2000 encoder options was investigated using the performance of human and model observers (nonprewhitening matched filter with an eye filter, square-window Hotelling, Laguerre-Gauss Hotelling and channelized Hotelling model observer) for clinically relevant visual tasks. Two tasks were investigated: the signal known exactly but variable task (SKEV) and the signal known statistically task (SKS). Test images consisted of real X-ray coronary angiograms with simulated filling defects (signals) inserted in one of the four simulated arteries. The signals varied in size and shape. Experimental results indicated that the dependence of task performance on the JPEG 2000 encoder options was similar for all model and human observers. Model observer performance in the more tractable and computationally economic SKEV task can be used to reliably estimate performance in the complex but clinically more realistic SKS task. JPEG 2000 encoder settings different from the default ones resulted in greatly improved model and human observer performance in the studied clinically relevant visual tasks using real angiography backgrounds.

[1]  W. W. Peterson,et al.  The theory of signal detectability , 1954, Trans. IRE Prof. Group Inf. Theory.

[2]  Michel Barlaud,et al.  Image coding using wavelet transform , 1992, IEEE Trans. Image Process..

[3]  A E Burgess,et al.  Visual signal detectability with two noise components: anomalous masking effects. , 1997, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics, image science, and vision.

[4]  Craig K. Abbey,et al.  A Practical Guide to Model Observers for Visual Detection in Synthetic and Natural Noisy Images , 2000 .

[5]  A. Burgess Statistically defined backgrounds: performance of a modified nonprewhitening observer model. , 1994, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics, image science, and vision.

[6]  Theodoros N. Arvanitis,et al.  A multistage perceptual quality assessment for compressed digital angiogram images , 2001, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[7]  W. P. Tanner PHYSIOLOGICAL IMPLICATIONS OF PSYCHOPHYSICAL DATA * , 1961, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences.

[8]  Faouzi Kossentini,et al.  JasPer: a software-based JPEG-2000 codec implementation , 2000, Proceedings 2000 International Conference on Image Processing (Cat. No.00CH37101).

[9]  D G Pelli,et al.  Uncertainty explains many aspects of visual contrast detection and discrimination. , 1985, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics and image science.

[10]  M P Eckstein,et al.  Lesion detection in structured noise. , 1995, Academic radiology.

[11]  Jung Hun Oh,et al.  Diagnostic quality testing for wavelet-com-pressed digital angiogram images , 1999 .

[12]  H.H. Barrett,et al.  Model observers for assessment of image quality , 1993, 2002 IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium Conference Record.

[13]  Craig K. Abbey,et al.  Optimization of model observer performance for signal known exactly but variable tasks leads to optimized performance in signal known statistically tasks , 2003, SPIE Medical Imaging.

[14]  H Ghandeharian,et al.  Visual signal detection. I. Ability to use phase information. , 1984, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics and image science.

[15]  M Eckstein,et al.  Observer performance for JPEG vs. Wavelet image compression of x-ray coronary angiograms. , 1999, Optics express.

[16]  C E Metz,et al.  Digital image processing: effect on detectability of simulated low-contrast radiographic patterns. , 1984, Radiology.

[17]  Jie Yao,et al.  Predicting human performance by a channelized Hotelling observer model , 1992, Optics & Photonics.

[18]  H. K. Huang Pacs: Picture Archiving and Communication Systems in Biomedical Imaging , 1996 .

[19]  Gerhard Koning,et al.  Effect of lossy data compression on quantitative coronary measurements , 1997, The International Journal of Cardiac Imaging.

[20]  H H Barrett,et al.  Hotelling trace criterion and its correlation with human-observer performance. , 1987, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics and image science.

[21]  Rüdiger Brennecke,et al.  Comparison of image compression viability for lossy and lossless JPEG and Wavelet data reduction in coronary angiography , 2001, The International Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging.

[22]  Kenneth E. Weaver,et al.  An Assortment Of Image Quality Indexes For Radiographic Film-Screen Combinations ---Can They Be Resolved? , 1972, Other Conferences.

[23]  Jay Bartroff,et al.  Automated computer evaluation and optimization of image compression of x-ray coronary angiograms for signal known exactly detection tasks. , 2003, Optics express.

[24]  T. Ebrahimi,et al.  JPEG 2000 : The Next Generation Still Image Compression Standard , 2000 .

[25]  R. Kruger,et al.  Scatter estimation for a digital radiographic system using convolution filtering. , 1987, Medical physics.

[26]  Craig K. Abbey,et al.  Stabilized estimates of Hotelling-observer detection performance in patient-structured noise , 1998, Medical Imaging.

[27]  G. B. John Mancini,et al.  Cardiac angiography without cine film: erecting a "Tower of Babel" in the cardiac catheterization laboratory. American College of Cardiology Cardiac Catheterization Committee. , 1994, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[28]  M P Eckstein,et al.  Improving detection of coronary morphological features from digital angiograms. Effect of stenosis-stabilized display. , 1994, Circulation.

[29]  R. F. Wagner,et al.  Efficiency of human visual signal discrimination. , 1981, Science.

[30]  J. Reiber,et al.  Effect of data compression on quantitative coronary measurements. , 1995, Catheterization and cardiovascular diagnosis.

[31]  M. Eckstein,et al.  Simulating coronary arteries in x-ray angiograms. , 2000, Medical physics.

[32]  H. Barrett,et al.  Effect of noise correlation on detectability of disk signals in medical imaging. , 1985, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics and image science.

[33]  M P Eckstein,et al.  Visual signal detection in structured backgrounds. III. Calculation of figures of merit for model observers in statistically nonstationary backgrounds. , 2000, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics, image science, and vision.

[34]  Majid Rabbani,et al.  An overview of the JPEG 2000 still image compression standard , 2002, Signal Process. Image Commun..

[35]  Touradj Ebrahimi,et al.  JPEG 2000 performance evaluation and assessment , 2002, Signal Process. Image Commun..

[36]  H H Barrett,et al.  Addition of a channel mechanism to the ideal-observer model. , 1987, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics and image science.

[37]  R. Harrington,et al.  Lossy (15:1) JPEG compression of digital coronary angiograms does not limit detection of subtle morphological features. , 1997, Circulation.

[38]  Michael Spann,et al.  Diagnostically lossless 3D wavelet compression for digital angiogram video , 2002, Proceedings DCC 2002. Data Compression Conference.

[39]  A E Burgess,et al.  Visual signal detection. II. Signal-location identification. , 1984, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics and image science.

[40]  Craig K. Abbey,et al.  Effect of image compression for model and human observers in signal-known-statistically tasks , 2002, SPIE Medical Imaging.

[41]  H H Barrett,et al.  Effect of random background inhomogeneity on observer detection performance. , 1992, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics and image science.

[42]  M P Eckstein,et al.  Visual signal detection in structured backgrounds. IV. Figures of merit for model performance in multiple-alternative forced-choice detection tasks with correlated responses. , 2000, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics, image science, and vision.

[43]  H H Barrett,et al.  Human- and model-observer performance in ramp-spectrum noise: effects of regularization and object variability. , 2001, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics, image science, and vision.

[44]  Touradj Ebrahimi,et al.  The JPEG 2000 still image compression standard , 2001, IEEE Signal Process. Mag..

[45]  A E Burgess Visual signal detection with two-component noise: low-pass spectrum effects. , 1999, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics, image science, and vision.

[46]  Min-Jen Tsai,et al.  Coronary angiogram video compression , 1994, Proceedings of 1994 IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium - NSS'94.

[47]  Craig K. Abbey,et al.  Effect of image compression in model and human performance , 1999, Medical Imaging.

[48]  M P Eckstein,et al.  Visual signal detection in structured backgrounds. I. Effect of number of possible spatial locations and signal contrast. , 1996, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics, image science, and vision.

[49]  S. Silber,et al.  Impact of various compression rates on interpretation of digital coronary angiograms. , 1997, International journal of cardiology.

[50]  Touradj Ebrahimi,et al.  The JPEG2000 still image coding system: an overview , 2000, IEEE Trans. Consumer Electron..