Evaluation of JPEG 2000 encoder options: human and model observer detection of variable signals in X-ray coronary angiograms
暂无分享,去创建一个
[1] W. W. Peterson,et al. The theory of signal detectability , 1954, Trans. IRE Prof. Group Inf. Theory.
[2] Michel Barlaud,et al. Image coding using wavelet transform , 1992, IEEE Trans. Image Process..
[3] A E Burgess,et al. Visual signal detectability with two noise components: anomalous masking effects. , 1997, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics, image science, and vision.
[4] Craig K. Abbey,et al. A Practical Guide to Model Observers for Visual Detection in Synthetic and Natural Noisy Images , 2000 .
[5] A. Burgess. Statistically defined backgrounds: performance of a modified nonprewhitening observer model. , 1994, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics, image science, and vision.
[6] Theodoros N. Arvanitis,et al. A multistage perceptual quality assessment for compressed digital angiogram images , 2001, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.
[7] W. P. Tanner. PHYSIOLOGICAL IMPLICATIONS OF PSYCHOPHYSICAL DATA * , 1961, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences.
[8] Faouzi Kossentini,et al. JasPer: a software-based JPEG-2000 codec implementation , 2000, Proceedings 2000 International Conference on Image Processing (Cat. No.00CH37101).
[9] D G Pelli,et al. Uncertainty explains many aspects of visual contrast detection and discrimination. , 1985, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics and image science.
[10] M P Eckstein,et al. Lesion detection in structured noise. , 1995, Academic radiology.
[11] Jung Hun Oh,et al. Diagnostic quality testing for wavelet-com-pressed digital angiogram images , 1999 .
[12] H.H. Barrett,et al. Model observers for assessment of image quality , 1993, 2002 IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium Conference Record.
[13] Craig K. Abbey,et al. Optimization of model observer performance for signal known exactly but variable tasks leads to optimized performance in signal known statistically tasks , 2003, SPIE Medical Imaging.
[14] H Ghandeharian,et al. Visual signal detection. I. Ability to use phase information. , 1984, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics and image science.
[15] M Eckstein,et al. Observer performance for JPEG vs. Wavelet image compression of x-ray coronary angiograms. , 1999, Optics express.
[16] C E Metz,et al. Digital image processing: effect on detectability of simulated low-contrast radiographic patterns. , 1984, Radiology.
[17] Jie Yao,et al. Predicting human performance by a channelized Hotelling observer model , 1992, Optics & Photonics.
[18] H. K. Huang. Pacs: Picture Archiving and Communication Systems in Biomedical Imaging , 1996 .
[19] Gerhard Koning,et al. Effect of lossy data compression on quantitative coronary measurements , 1997, The International Journal of Cardiac Imaging.
[20] H H Barrett,et al. Hotelling trace criterion and its correlation with human-observer performance. , 1987, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics and image science.
[21] Rüdiger Brennecke,et al. Comparison of image compression viability for lossy and lossless JPEG and Wavelet data reduction in coronary angiography , 2001, The International Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging.
[22] Kenneth E. Weaver,et al. An Assortment Of Image Quality Indexes For Radiographic Film-Screen Combinations ---Can They Be Resolved? , 1972, Other Conferences.
[23] Jay Bartroff,et al. Automated computer evaluation and optimization of image compression of x-ray coronary angiograms for signal known exactly detection tasks. , 2003, Optics express.
[24] T. Ebrahimi,et al. JPEG 2000 : The Next Generation Still Image Compression Standard , 2000 .
[25] R. Kruger,et al. Scatter estimation for a digital radiographic system using convolution filtering. , 1987, Medical physics.
[26] Craig K. Abbey,et al. Stabilized estimates of Hotelling-observer detection performance in patient-structured noise , 1998, Medical Imaging.
[27] G. B. John Mancini,et al. Cardiac angiography without cine film: erecting a "Tower of Babel" in the cardiac catheterization laboratory. American College of Cardiology Cardiac Catheterization Committee. , 1994, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.
[28] M P Eckstein,et al. Improving detection of coronary morphological features from digital angiograms. Effect of stenosis-stabilized display. , 1994, Circulation.
[29] R. F. Wagner,et al. Efficiency of human visual signal discrimination. , 1981, Science.
[30] J. Reiber,et al. Effect of data compression on quantitative coronary measurements. , 1995, Catheterization and cardiovascular diagnosis.
[31] M. Eckstein,et al. Simulating coronary arteries in x-ray angiograms. , 2000, Medical physics.
[32] H. Barrett,et al. Effect of noise correlation on detectability of disk signals in medical imaging. , 1985, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics and image science.
[33] M P Eckstein,et al. Visual signal detection in structured backgrounds. III. Calculation of figures of merit for model observers in statistically nonstationary backgrounds. , 2000, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics, image science, and vision.
[34] Majid Rabbani,et al. An overview of the JPEG 2000 still image compression standard , 2002, Signal Process. Image Commun..
[35] Touradj Ebrahimi,et al. JPEG 2000 performance evaluation and assessment , 2002, Signal Process. Image Commun..
[36] H H Barrett,et al. Addition of a channel mechanism to the ideal-observer model. , 1987, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics and image science.
[37] R. Harrington,et al. Lossy (15:1) JPEG compression of digital coronary angiograms does not limit detection of subtle morphological features. , 1997, Circulation.
[38] Michael Spann,et al. Diagnostically lossless 3D wavelet compression for digital angiogram video , 2002, Proceedings DCC 2002. Data Compression Conference.
[39] A E Burgess,et al. Visual signal detection. II. Signal-location identification. , 1984, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics and image science.
[40] Craig K. Abbey,et al. Effect of image compression for model and human observers in signal-known-statistically tasks , 2002, SPIE Medical Imaging.
[41] H H Barrett,et al. Effect of random background inhomogeneity on observer detection performance. , 1992, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics and image science.
[42] M P Eckstein,et al. Visual signal detection in structured backgrounds. IV. Figures of merit for model performance in multiple-alternative forced-choice detection tasks with correlated responses. , 2000, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics, image science, and vision.
[43] H H Barrett,et al. Human- and model-observer performance in ramp-spectrum noise: effects of regularization and object variability. , 2001, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics, image science, and vision.
[44] Touradj Ebrahimi,et al. The JPEG 2000 still image compression standard , 2001, IEEE Signal Process. Mag..
[45] A E Burgess. Visual signal detection with two-component noise: low-pass spectrum effects. , 1999, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics, image science, and vision.
[46] Min-Jen Tsai,et al. Coronary angiogram video compression , 1994, Proceedings of 1994 IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium - NSS'94.
[47] Craig K. Abbey,et al. Effect of image compression in model and human performance , 1999, Medical Imaging.
[48] M P Eckstein,et al. Visual signal detection in structured backgrounds. I. Effect of number of possible spatial locations and signal contrast. , 1996, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics, image science, and vision.
[49] S. Silber,et al. Impact of various compression rates on interpretation of digital coronary angiograms. , 1997, International journal of cardiology.
[50] Touradj Ebrahimi,et al. The JPEG2000 still image coding system: an overview , 2000, IEEE Trans. Consumer Electron..