Ocular Pulse Amplitude in Patients With Descemet Stripping Endothelial Keratoplasty

Purpose:To study the relationship of ocular pulse amplitude (OPA) and intraocular pressure (IOP) in eyes that have undergone successful Descemet stripping endothelial keratoplasty (DSEK). Patients and Methods:Fifty eyes of 38 patients with successful DSEK at a single tertiary referral center were followed up for at least 3 months. At the time of the study all patients were carefully examined to rule out any clinically detectable corneal edema. IOP was measured by Goldmann applanation tonometry (GAT), pneumotonometry (PT), and dynamic contour tonometry (DCT). IOP, OPA, and quality measurements were recorded. Central corneal thickness (CCT) was measured by ultrasonic pachymetry. Results:Mean IOP was 15.9±4.9 mm Hg by GAT, 20.3±4.6 mm Hg by PT, and 19.8±4.4 mm Hg by DCT. Mean OPA was 2.53±1.24 mm Hg. OPA was correlated with GAT (r=0.357, P=0.011) and PT (r=0.316, P=0.026). The correlation of OPA and DCT approached significance (r=0.270, P=0.058). Mean CCT was 701±65 µm (range, 529 to 928 µm). OPA was not associated with CCT (r=0.238, P=0.096). Conclusions:In eyes with DSEK, our results showed that OPA was similar to that reported in normal eyes. Comparable with results in normal eyes, OPA was not associated with CCT but was associated with increasing IOP in DSEK eyes.

[1]  A. Wells,et al.  The effect of thin, thick, and normal corneas on Goldmann intraocular pressure measurements and correction formulae in individual eyes. , 2012, Ophthalmology.

[2]  N. Orzalesi,et al.  Test–retest variability of intraocular pressure and ocular pulse amplitude for dynamic contour tonometry: a multicentre study , 2009, British Journal of Ophthalmology.

[3]  D. Goodwin,et al.  Comparison of dynamic contour tonometry and Goldmann applanation tonometry and their relationship to corneal properties, refractive error, and ocular pulse amplitude. , 2009, Optometry.

[4]  C. Kaufmann,et al.  Comparison of dynamic contour tonometry with Goldmann applanation tonometry following Descemet's stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty (DSAEK). , 2009, Klinische Monatsblatter fur Augenheilkunde.

[5]  T. Spector,et al.  The heritability of corneal hysteresis and ocular pulse amplitude: a twin study. , 2008, Ophthalmology.

[6]  J. Wilensky,et al.  Intraocular pressure measurements following Descemet stripping endothelial keratoplasty. , 2008, American journal of ophthalmology.

[7]  Shan C. Lin,et al.  Dynamic contour tonometry: principle and use , 2006, Clinical & experimental ophthalmology.

[8]  Y. Robert,et al.  Ocular pulse amplitude in healthy subjects as measured by dynamic contour tonometry. , 2006, Archives of ophthalmology.

[9]  S. Asrani,et al.  The Clinical Utility of Dynamic Contour Tonometry and Ocular Pulse Amplitude , 2006, Journal of glaucoma.

[10]  Marianne O Price,et al.  Descemet's stripping with endothelial keratoplasty in 200 eyes: Early challenges and techniques to enhance donor adherence , 2006, Journal of cataract and refractive surgery.

[11]  Shan C. Lin,et al.  Intraocular Pressure and Ocular Pulse Amplitude Comparisons in Different Types of Glaucoma Using Dynamic Contour Tonometry , 2006, Current eye research.

[12]  H. Kanngiesser,et al.  Dynamic Contour Tonometry: Presentation of a New Tonometer , 2005, Journal of glaucoma.