The ca. 30 km3 Taupo ignimbrite was erupted as a climax to the ca. AD 186 Taupo eruption in the central North Island of New Zealand. It was erupted as a single vent-generated flow unit over a time period of ca. 400 s and was emplaced very rapidly (locally at more than 250-300 m s-1) and violently. The parent flow reached 8 0 + 10 km from source in all directions, crossed all but one of the mountains within its range and only stopped when it ran out of material. The ignimbrite is divisible into layers 1 and 2, and a distant facies which combines features of both layers. Layer 1 was generated as a result of strong fluidization in the flow head, caused by air ingestion, and consists of two main facies. Layer 1(P) is a pumiceous, mildly to strongly fines-depleted unit, generated by the expulsion of material from the flow front, and termed the jetted deposits. The overlying layer 1 (H) is a thinner, crystal- and lithic-rich, fines-depleted unit, generated by the sedimentation of coarse/dense constituents segregated out by strong fluidization within the flow head and termed the ground layer. Layer 2 consists of two facies with similar compositions but contrasting morphologies; during emplacement, material left behind by the flow body partially drained into depressions to form the valley-ponded ignimbrite, leaving the veneer deposit as a thin, landscape mantling layer on interfluves. The distant facies occurs in some outermost hilly areas of the ignimbrite where the flow velocity remained high but its volume had shrunk through deposition so that air ingestion fluidization affected the whole flow. The ignimbrite shows great lateral variations. Each facies, or variants therein, exhibits systematic degrees of development with varying distances from vent. Near vent, the flow consisted of a series of batches of material which by ca. 25 km had coalesced into a single wavy flow and by ca. 40 km into a single wave. Out to ca. 13 km, the flow was rather dilute and highly turbulent as it deflated from the collapsing eruption column. Beyond this distance it was fairly concentrated, being less than 100% expanded over its non-fluidized compacted state, and had acquired a fluidization-induced stable density stratification, which strongly suppressed turbulence in the flow body. Deflation from the eruption column was largely complete by ca. 13 km but influenced the flow as far as 20-25 km from vent. Grainsize and compositional parameters measured in the ignimbrite show lateral variations which equal or exceed the entire spectrum of published ignimbrite data. The flow had deflated and coalesced from the eruption column by ca. 20 km from vent. Beyond this distance most lateral variations are modelled by considering the flow to be a giant fluidized bed. As the flow moved, material was deposited from its base, and hence predictable vertical variations in the model fluidized bed are comparable with lateral variations in the ignimbrite. The agreement is excellent, and, in particular, discontinuities in the nature of the ignimbrite at 55-60 km from vent suggest that the more distal ignimbrite represents a vast segregation layer generated above the moving flow. Differences between the model and variations of some parameters reflect the influence of kinetic processes, such as shearing and local fluidization, that operated regardless of the bulk flow composition. The strong fluidization in the flow is a result of the high flow velocities (promoting air ingestion), not vice versa as is often accepted. Contrasts in the natures of layers 1 and 2 imply that the first material erupted contained significantly coarser, and a higher content of, lithics than the bulk of the flow. During emplacement, this earlier material was depleted by deposition and diluted by material introduced from the flow body. Systematic regional variations also occur in the ignimbrite: for example, it contains lower crystal: lithic ratios and higher density pumice in a northeasterly sector, and vice versa to the southwest. Ignimbrite found in mountainous areas shows changes consistent with its derivation from the upper, more mobile and pumiceous top of the flow. Fluidization processes generated structures and facies in the ignimbrite on various scales. Individual segregation bodies found at any exposure show features mimicking those of the ground layer, i.e. fines depletion and crystal- and lithic-enrichment. Fluidization-induced grading visible at individual exposures accounts for the great range of grading styles seen in the valley-ponded ignimbrite, and strong fluidization has locally generated an upper fines- and pumice- rich segregation layer (here termed layer 2c). On the largest scale, fluidization was primarily responsible for the generation of the layer 1 deposits, and for the grainsize and compositional zonation within the flow that produced the lateral variations in the ignimbrite. Ingested and heated air is inferred to have been the most important gas source for fluidization within the flow, although several other gas sources were locally dominant. It is clear that the thickness, grainsize and composition of the ignimbrite at any point are not simply related to values of these parameters in either the originally erupted material or the parent flow, and that, except for its density, the dimensions and composition of the parent flow cannot be directly inferred from the ignimbrite.
[1]
Colin J. N. Wilson,et al.
The Taupo eruption, New Zealand I. General aspects
,
1985,
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series A, Mathematical and Physical Sciences.
[2]
G. Walker,et al.
Ignimbrite depositional facies: the anatomy of a pyroclastic flow
,
1982,
Journal of the Geological Society.
[3]
S. Self,et al.
Historic Eruptions of Tambora (1815), Krakatau (1883), and Agung (1963), their Stratospheric Aerosols, and Climatic Impact
,
1982,
Quaternary Research.
[4]
M C Malin,et al.
Computer-Assisted Mapping of Pyroclastic Surges
,
1982,
Science.
[5]
T. Ui,et al.
Grain orientation and depositional ramps as flow direction indicators of a large-scale pyroclastic flow deposit in Japan
,
1982
.
[6]
S. Self,et al.
The 1883 eruption of Krakatau
,
1981,
Nature.
[7]
John V. Wright.
The rio caliente ignimbrite: Analysis of a compound intraplinian ignimbrite from a major late quaternary Mexican eruption
,
1981
.
[8]
P. Froggatt.
Stratigraphy and nature of Taupo Pumice Formation
,
1981
.
[9]
C. J. Wilson.
Studies on the origins and emplacement of pyroclastic flows
,
1981
.
[10]
G. Walker,et al.
Violence in Pyroclastic Flow Eruptions
,
1981
.
[11]
G. Walker,et al.
Fines-depleted ignimbrite in New Zealand — The product of a turbulent pyroclastic flow
,
1980
.
[12]
G. Walker,et al.
Low-aspect ratio ignimbrites
,
1980,
Nature.
[13]
Rex Britter,et al.
The dynamics of the head of a gravity current advancing over a horizontal surface
,
1979,
Journal of Fluid Mechanics.
[14]
R. Sparks,et al.
Duration of large-magnitude explosive eruptions deduced from graded bedding in deep-sea ash layers
,
1979
.
[15]
J. V. Wright.
Formation, transport and deposition of ignimbrites and welded tuffs
,
1979
.
[16]
R. Sparks,et al.
The exceptional magnitude and intensity of the Toba eruption, sumatra: An example of the use of deep-sea tephra layers as a geological tool
,
1978
.
[17]
R. S. J. Sparks,et al.
Gas release rates from pyroclastic flows: a assessment of the role of fluidisation in their emplacement
,
1978
.
[18]
L. Lirer,et al.
The campanian ignimbrite: a major prehistoric eruption in the Neapolitan area (Italy)
,
1978
.
[19]
Jack Wright,et al.
The ignimbrite source problem: Significance of a co-ignimbrite lag-fall deposit
,
1977
.
[20]
P. Francis,et al.
Mobility of pyroclastic flows
,
1977,
Nature.
[21]
Robert L. Smith,et al.
Spectacular mobility of ash flows around Aniakchak and Fisher calderas, Alaska
,
1977
.
[22]
R. Sparks,et al.
Grain size variations in ignimbrites and implications for the transport of pyroclastic flows
,
1976
.
[23]
R. Sparks.
Stratigraphy and geology of the ignimbrites of Vulsini Volcano, central Italy
,
1975
.
[24]
S. Self,et al.
Products of Ignimbrite Eruptions
,
1973
.
[25]
G. Walker.
Crystal concentration in ignimbrites
,
1972
.
[26]
G. Walker,et al.
Grain-Size Characteristics of Pyroclastic Deposits
,
1971,
The Journal of Geology.
[27]
T. Benjamin.
Gravity currents and related phenomena
,
1968,
Journal of Fluid Mechanics.
[28]
G. Curtis.
The Stratigraphy of the Ejecta from the 1912 Eruption of Mount Katmai and Novarupta, Alaska
,
1968
.
[29]
T. Ui,et al.
The aira and ata pyroclastic flows and related caldera and depressions in southern Kyushu, Japan
,
1966
.
[30]
R. V. Fisher.
Mechanism of deposition from pyroclastic flows
,
1966
.
[31]
K. Mctaggart.
The mobility of nuees ardentes
,
1960
.
[32]
D. L. Reynolds.
Fluidization as a geological process, and its bearing on the problem of intrusive granites
,
1954
.
[33]
R. Bagnold.
Experiments on a gravity-free dispersion of large solid spheres in a Newtonian fluid under shear
,
1954,
Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series A. Mathematical and Physical Sciences.
[34]
C. Fenner,et al.
Volcanism in Alaska@@@The Origin and Mode of Emplacement of the Great Tuff Deposit of the Valley of Ten Thousand Smokes@@@A Chemical Study of the Fumaroles of the Katmai Region
,
1924
.
[35]
T. Anderson,et al.
IX. Report on the eruptions of the soufrière, St. Vincent, 1902, and on a visit to Montagne Pelèe, in Martinique. -Part I.
,
1903,
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series A, Containing Papers of a Mathematical or Physical Character.