Fraud Type and Auditor Litigation: An Analysis of SEC Accounting and Auditing Enforcement Releases

This study examines whether certain types of financial reporting fraud result in a higher likelihood of litigation against independent auditors. We expect that auditors are more likely to be judged responsible for failing to detect commonly occurring frauds or those that stem from fictitious transactions. We examine companies with SEC Accounting and Auditing Enforcement Releases and designate whether each fraud present in their financial statements is common and/or arises from fictitious transactions. We then examine whether these types of fraud are related to auditor litigation in analyses that control for various client, auditor and case characteristics. Our results provide some support for our two primary hypotheses-auditors are more likely to be sued when the financial statement frauds are of a common variety or when the frauds arise from fictitious transactions.

[1]  Larry M. Parker,et al.  SEC communications to the independent auditors: An analysis of enforcement actions , 1992 .

[2]  J. Sweeney,et al.  Fraudulently Misstated Financial Statements and Insider Trading: An Empirical Analysis , 1997 .

[3]  Christopher L. Jones,et al.  The Determinants of 10b-5 Litigation Risk , 1996 .

[4]  Eric W. Stein.  A look at expertise from a social perspective , 1997 .

[5]  Ehsan H. Feroz,et al.  The Financial and Market Effects of the SEC's Accounting and Auditing Enforcement Releases , 1991 .

[6]  Patricia M. Dechow,et al.  Causes and Consequences of Earnings Manipulation: An Analysis of Firms Subject to Enforcement Actions by the SEC* , 1996 .

[7]  J. R. Boyll.  Psychological, cognitive, personality and interpersonal factors in jury verdicts. , 1991 .

[8]  F. Buckless,et al.  The Influence of the Source of Professional Standards on Juror Decision Making , 1993 .

[9]  hvaillancourt.  Understanding the Plaintiff’s Attorney: The Implications of Economic Theory for Private Enforcement of Law through Class and Derivative Actions , 1986 .

[10]  Benjamin Klein,et al.  The Selection of Disputes for Litigation , 1984, The Journal of Legal Studies.

[11]  Joseph V. Carcello,et al.  Auditor Litigation and Modified Reporting on Bankrupt Clients , 1994 .

[12]  J. M. Cook,et al.  The Liability Crisis in the United States: Impact on the Accounting Profession , 1992 .

[13]  Steven E. Kaplan,et al.  The effect of using diagnostic decision aids for analytical procedures on judges' liability judgments , 1995 .

[14]  J. Darley,et al.  Attribution of Responsibility for Accidents: A Negligence Law Analogy , 1988 .

[15]  Patricia M. Dechow,et al.  DETECTING EARNINGS MANAGEMENT , 1994 .

[16]  Daniel Kahneman,et al.  Availability: A heuristic for judging frequency and probability , 1973 .

[17]  H. Kelley.  Attribution theory in social psychology , 1967 .

[18]  Michael J. Saks,et al.  Human Information Processing and Adjudication: Trial by Heuristics , 1980 .

[19]  N. Pennington,et al.  Practical Implications of Psychological Research on Juror and Jury Decision Making , 1990 .

[20]  M. D. Beneish,et al.  Detecting GAAP violation: implications for assessing earnings management among firms with extreme financial performance , 1997 .

[21]  C. Arrington,et al.  An Attribution Analysis Of Responsibility Assessment For Audit Performance , 1985 .

[22]  B. Fischhoff,et al.  Judged frequency of lethal events , 1978 .

[23]  G. Bower,et al.  Judgmental biases resulting from differing availabilities of arguments. , 1980 .

[24]  Dan C. Kneer,et al.  The Significance of Audit Decision Aids and Precase Jurists' Attitudes on Perceptions of Audit Firm Culpability and Liability* , 1993 .

[25]  Eugene Borgida,et al.  Judgment under uncertainty: Popular induction: Information is not necessarily informative , 1982 .

[26]  L. Ross,et al.  Judgment under uncertainty: Shortcomings in the attribution process: On the origins and maintenance of erroneous social assessments , 1982 .

[27]  J. Alexander.  Do the Merits Matter? A Study of Settlements in Securities Class Actions , 1991 .

[28]  J. Francis,et al.  SHAREHOLDER LITIGATION AND CORPORATE DISCLOSURES , 1994 .

[29]  R. Rakos,et al.  A preliminary inquiry into the effect of potentially biasing information on judges and jurors in civil litigation , 1994 .

[30]  John J. Willingham,et al.  Management fraud: Detection and deterrence , 1980 .

[31]  H. Kelley.  The processes of causal attribution. , 1973 .

[32]  M. Jackson.  Psychiatric decision-making for the courts: judges, psychiatrists, lay people? , 1986, International journal of law and psychiatry.

[33]  Y. Loewenstein.  The Accounting Review , 1972 .

[34]  B. Weiner.  Achievement Motivation and Attribution Theory , 1974 .

[35]  R. Watts,et al.  Lawsuits Against Auditors , 1994 .

[36]  Zoe-Vonna Palmrose,et al.  Trials Of Legal Disputes Involving Independent Auditors - Some Empirical-Evidence , 1991 .

[37]  I. Kellogg,et al.  Fraud, window dressing, and negligence in financial statements , 1991 .