Validity is an integrated evaluative judgment of the degree to which empirical evidence and theoretical rationales support the adequacy and appropriateness of interpretations and actions based on test scores or other modes of assessment. The principles of validity apply not just to interpretive and action inferences derived from test scores as ordinarily conceived, but also to inferences based on any means of observing or documenting consistent behaviors or attributes. The key issues of test validity are the meaning, relevance, and utility of scores; the import or value implications of scores as a basis for action; and the functional worth of scores in terms of the social consequences of their use. For some time, test validity has been broken into content validity, predictive validity and concurrent criterion-related validity, and construct validity. The only form of validity neglected or bypassed in these traditional formulations is that bearing on the social consequences of test interpretation and use. Validity becomes a unified concept when it is recognized, or assured, that construct validation subsumes considerations of content, criteria, and consequences. Speaking of validity as a unified concept doGs not mean that it cannot be differentiated into facets to underscore particular issues. The construct validity of score meaning is the integrating force that unifies validity issues into a unitary concept. (Contains 1 table and 25 references.) (SLD) **u******************************************************************** Reproductions supplied by EDRS are the best that can be made from the original document. ***********************************************************************
[1]
W. A. Mehrens.
Validity issues in teacher licensure tests
,
1987
.
[2]
J. Loevinger.
Objective Tests as Instruments of Psychological Theory
,
1957
.
[3]
Lee J. Cronbach,et al.
Psychological tests and personnel decisions
,
1958
.
[4]
Susy Macqueen,et al.
Validity
,
1973,
Just Algorithms.
[5]
Roger T. Lennon,et al.
Assumptions Underlying the Use of Content Validity
,
1956
.
[6]
L. Cronbach,et al.
Construct validity in psychological tests.
,
1955,
Psychological bulletin.
[7]
C. Churchman,et al.
The design of inquiring systems: basic concepts of systems and organization
,
1971
.
[8]
H. Gulliksen,et al.
Intrinsic validity.
,
1950,
The American psychologist.
[9]
S. Messick.
Test validity and the ethics of assessment.
,
1980
.
[10]
John E. Hunter,et al.
FORTY QUESTIONS ABOUT VALIDITY GENERALIZATION AND META‐ANALYSIS
,
1985
.
[11]
D. Campbell,et al.
Convergent and discriminant validation by the multitrait-multimethod matrix.
,
1959,
Psychological bulletin.
[12]
R. Snow,et al.
Implications of cognitive psychology for educational measurement.
,
1989
.
[13]
S. Messick.
Meaning and Values in Test Validation: The Science and Ethics of Assessment
,
1989
.
[14]
J. Singer,et al.
Psychological consequences of brain lesions and ablations.
,
1954,
Psychological bulletin.
[15]
S. Messick.
THE STANDARD PROBLEM: MEANING AND VALUES IN MEASUREMENT AND EVALUATION
,
1974
.