Parameter identification and global sensitivity analysis of Xin'anjiang model using meta-modeling approach

Parameter identification, model calibration, and uncertainty quantification are important steps in the model-building process, and are necessary for obtaining credible results and valuable information. Sensitivity analysis of hydrological model is a key step in model uncertainty quantification, which can identify the dominant parameters, reduce the model calibration uncertainty, and enhance the model optimization efficiency. There are, however, some shortcomings in classical approaches, including the long duration of time and high computation cost required to quantitatively assess the sensitivity of a multiple-parameter hydrological model. For this reason, a two-step statistical evaluation framework using global techniques is presented. It is based on (1) a screening method (Morris) for qualitative ranking of parameters, and (2) a variance-based method integrated with a meta-model for quantitative sensitivity analysis, i.e., the Sobol method integrated with the response surface model (RSMSobol). First, the Morris screening method was used to qualitatively identify the parameters' sensitivity, and then ten parameters were selected to quantify the sensitivity indices. Subsequently, the RSMSobol method was used to quantify the sensitivity, i.e., the first-order and total sensitivity indices based on the response surface model (RSM) were calculated. The RSMSobol method can not only quantify the sensitivity, but also reduce the computational cost, with good accuracy compared to the classical approaches. This approach will be effective and reliable in the global sensitivity analysis of a complex large-scale distributed hydrological model.

[1]  George Z. Gertner,et al.  Extending a global sensitivity analysis technique to models with correlated parameters , 2007, Comput. Stat. Data Anal..

[2]  Rafael Muñoz-Carpena,et al.  GLOBAL SENSITIVITY AND UNCERTAINTY ANALYSES OF THE WATER QUALITY MODEL VFSMOD-W , 2007 .

[3]  Jon C. Helton,et al.  Implementation and evaluation of nonparametric regression procedures for sensitivity analysis of computationally demanding models , 2009, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[4]  Douglas C. Montgomery,et al.  Response Surface Methodology: Process and Product Optimization Using Designed Experiments , 1995 .

[5]  Aurora Cuartero,et al.  Testing Multivariate Adaptive Regression Splines (MARS) as a Method of Land Cover Classification of TERRA-ASTER Satellite Images , 2009, Sensors.

[6]  Jun Xia,et al.  An efficient global sensitivity analysis approach for distributed hydrological model , 2012, Journal of Geographical Sciences.

[7]  Zheng Bin,et al.  Relationship between the Onset of the South China Sea Summer Monsoon and Abnormal Variations of frontal Precipitation during the First Rainy Period in South China , 2010 .

[8]  Olivier Roustant,et al.  Calculations of Sobol indices for the Gaussian process metamodel , 2008, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[9]  Peter C. Young,et al.  State Dependent Parameter metamodelling and sensitivity analysis , 2007, Comput. Phys. Commun..

[10]  A. Saltelli,et al.  Tackling quantitatively large dimensionality problems , 1999 .

[11]  I. Sobol,et al.  On quasi-Monte Carlo integrations , 1998 .

[12]  Zhao Ren-jun,et al.  The Xinanjiang model applied in China , 1992 .

[13]  Jun Xia,et al.  An efficient integrated approach for global sensitivity analysis of hydrological model parameters , 2013, Environ. Model. Softw..

[14]  Henrik Madsen,et al.  Automatic calibration of a conceptual rainfall-runoff model using multiple objectives. , 2000 .

[15]  Kjell A. Doksum,et al.  Nonparametric Estimation of Global Functionals and a Measure of the Explanatory Power of Covariates in Regression , 1995 .

[16]  Jun Xia,et al.  Integration of a statistical emulator approach with the SCE-UA method for parameter optimization of a hydrological model , 2012 .

[17]  P. Reed,et al.  Hydrology and Earth System Sciences Discussions Comparing Sensitivity Analysis Methods to Advance Lumped Watershed Model Identification and Evaluation , 2022 .

[18]  George Z. Gertner,et al.  Understanding and comparisons of different sampling approaches for the Fourier Amplitudes Sensitivity Test (FAST) , 2011, Comput. Stat. Data Anal..

[19]  Chen Yang-bo,et al.  Global Sensitivity Analysis of Xinanjiang Model Parameters Based on Extend FAST Method , 2010 .

[20]  S. Grunwald,et al.  A global sensitivity analysis tool for the parameters of multivariable catchment models , 2006 .

[21]  X. R. Liu,et al.  The Xinanjiang model. , 1995 .

[22]  Song Xiao-Meng,et al.  An Efficient Quantitative Sensitivity Analysis Approach for Hydrological Model Parameters Using RSMSobol Method , 2011 .

[23]  J. D. Morrison,et al.  Evaluating prediction uncertainty in simulation models , 1999 .

[24]  S. Rahman Reliability Engineering and System Safety , 2011 .

[25]  Ratna Babu Chinnam,et al.  Metamodels for variable importance decomposition with applications to probabilistic engineering design , 2009, Comput. Ind. Eng..

[26]  Patrick M. Reed,et al.  Advancing the identification and evaluation of distributed rainfall‐runoff models using global sensitivity analysis , 2007 .

[27]  Savely Polevoy,et al.  Water science and engineering , 1996 .

[28]  J. Freidman,et al.  Multivariate adaptive regression splines , 1991 .

[29]  C. Honey,et al.  Identification and Classification of Hubs in Brain , 2007 .

[30]  Fanzhe Kong,et al.  Application of Muskingum routing method with variable parameters in ungauged basin , 2011 .

[31]  H. S. Wheater,et al.  Predicting runoff in ungauged UK catchments , 2006 .

[32]  Jun Xia,et al.  Advances in the study of uncertainty quantification of large-scale hydrological modeling system , 2011 .

[33]  Max D. Morris,et al.  Factorial sampling plans for preliminary computational experiments , 1991 .

[34]  Jack P. C. Kleijnen,et al.  A methodology for fitting and validating metamodels in simulation , 2000, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[35]  R. Srinivasan,et al.  A global sensitivity analysis tool for the parameters of multi-variable catchment models , 2006 .

[36]  Chesheng Zhan,et al.  Hybrid Optimization Rainfall-Runoff Simulation Based on Xinanjiang Model and Artificial Neural Network , 2012 .

[37]  Peter R. Jones,et al.  Implementation and Evaluation , 1995 .

[38]  Chuntian Cheng,et al.  Using genetic algorithm and TOPSIS for Xinanjiang model calibration with a single procedure , 2006 .

[39]  Xuesong Zhang,et al.  Evaluating the SWAT Model for Hydrological Modeling in the Xixian Watershed and a Comparison with the XAJ Model , 2011 .

[40]  Yongqiang Zhang,et al.  Predicting runoff in ungauged catchments by using Xinanjiang model with MODIS leaf area index , 2009 .

[41]  Song Xiao-Meng,et al.  Sensitivity analysis of hydrological model parameters using a statistical theory approach , 2012 .

[42]  Maarten S. Krol,et al.  Identification and classification of uncertainties in the application of environmental models , 2010, Environ. Model. Softw..

[43]  Jing Yang,et al.  Convergence and uncertainty analyses in Monte-Carlo based sensitivity analysis , 2011, Environ. Model. Softw..

[44]  Thomas C. Sharkey,et al.  Identification and Classification of Noise Patterns , 2008 .

[45]  Vicki L. Sauter,et al.  Implementation and Evaluation , 2011 .

[46]  Malka Gorfine,et al.  Sensitivity analysis for complex ecological models - A new approach , 2011, Environ. Model. Softw..

[47]  Patrick Willems,et al.  Assessment of the sensitivity and prediction uncertainty of evaporation models applied to Nasser Lake, Egypt , 2010 .

[48]  Andrea Saltelli,et al.  An effective screening design for sensitivity analysis of large models , 2007, Environ. Model. Softw..

[49]  I. Sobol Uniformly distributed sequences with an additional uniform property , 1976 .

[50]  Xia Jun,et al.  A Review on Uncertainty Analysis of Large-scale Hydrological Cycle Modeling System , 2011 .

[51]  C. T. Haan,et al.  Statistical Procedure for Evaluating Hydrologic/Water Quality Models , 1995 .

[52]  Stefano Tarantola,et al.  Sensitivity Analysis in Practice: A Guide to Assessing Scientific Models , 2004 .

[53]  H Christopher Frey,et al.  OF SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS , 2001 .