Genomic predictions for crossbred dairy cattle.

Genomic evaluations are useful for crossbred as well as purebred populations when selection is applied to commercial herds. Dairy farmers had already spent more than $1 million to genotype over 32,000 crossbred animals before US genomic evaluations became available for those animals. Thus, new tools were needed to provide accurate genomic predictions for crossbreds. Genotypes for crossbreds are imputed more accurately when the imputation reference population includes purebreds. Therefore, genotypes of 6,296 crossbred animals were imputed from lower-density chips by including either 3,119 ancestors or 834,367 genotyped animals in the reference population. Crossbreds in the imputation study included 733 Jersey × Holstein F1 animals, 55 Brown Swiss × Holstein F1 animals, 2,300 Holstein backcrosses, 2,026 Jersey backcrosses, 27 Brown Swiss backcrosses, and 502 other crossbreds of various breed combinations. Another 653 animals appeared to be purebreds that owners had miscoded as a different breed. Genomic breed composition was estimated from 60,671 markers using the known breed identities for purebred, progeny-tested Holstein, Jersey, Brown Swiss, Ayrshire, and Guernsey bulls as the 5 traits (breed fractions) to be predicted. Estimates of breed composition were adjusted so that no percentages were negative or exceeded 100%, and breed percentages summed to 100%. Another adjustment set percentages above 93.5% equal to 100%, and the resulting value was termed breed base representation (BBR). Larger percentages of missing alleles were imputed by using a crossbred reference population rather than only the closest purebred reference population. Crossbred predictions were averages of genomic predictions computed using marker effects for each pure breed, which were weighted by the animal's BBR. Marker and polygenic effects were estimated separately for each breed on the all-breed scale instead of within-breed scales. For crossbreds, genomic predictions weighted by BBR were more accurate than the average of parents' breeding values and slightly more accurate than predictions using only the predominant breed. For purebreds, single-trait predictions using only within-breed data were as accurate as multi-trait predictions with allele effects in different breeds treated as correlated effects. Crossbred genomic predicted transmitting abilities were implemented by the Council on Dairy Cattle Breeding in April 2019 and will aid producers in managing their breeding programs and selecting replacement heifers.

[1]  M. Calus,et al.  Genomic evaluation for a three-way crossbreeding system considering breed-of-origin of alleles , 2017, Genetics Selection Evolution.

[2]  P. VanRaden,et al.  Efficient methods to compute genomic predictions. , 2008, Journal of dairy science.

[3]  S. McWilliam,et al.  Genomic correlation: harnessing the benefit of combining two unrelated populations for genomic selection , 2015, Genetics Selection Evolution.

[4]  P. VanRaden,et al.  Invited review: reliability of genomic predictions for North American Holstein bulls. , 2009, Journal of dairy science.

[5]  M. Lund,et al.  Sequence variants selected from a multi-breed GWAS can improve the reliability of genomic predictions in dairy cattle , 2016, Genetics Selection Evolution.

[6]  Andrés Legarra,et al.  Joint genomic evaluation of French dairy cattle breeds using multiple-trait models , 2012, Genetics Selection Evolution.

[7]  M. Calus,et al.  Selection of SNP from 50K and 777K arrays to predict breed of origin in cattle. , 2013, Journal of animal science.

[8]  D. Boichard,et al.  Efficiency of multi-breed genomic selection for dairy cattle breeds with different sizes of reference population. , 2014, Journal of dairy science.

[9]  K. Khare,et al.  BIBI: Bayesian inference of breed composition , 2017, Journal of animal breeding and genetics = Zeitschrift fur Tierzuchtung und Zuchtungsbiologie.

[10]  J. Cole,et al.  Genomic selection in multi-breed dairy cattle populations , 2016 .

[11]  M. Lund,et al.  Comparing power and precision of within-breed and multibreed genome-wide association studies of production traits using whole-genome sequence data for 5 French and Danish dairy cattle breeds. , 2016, Journal of dairy science.

[12]  P. VanRaden,et al.  Confirmation and discovery of maternal grandsires and great-grandsires in dairy cattle. , 2013, Journal of dairy science.

[13]  Jeffrey R. O’Connell,et al.  Fast imputation using medium or low-coverage sequence data , 2014, BMC Genetics.

[14]  P. VanRaden,et al.  Multibreed genomic evaluations using purebred Holsteins, Jerseys, and Brown Swiss. , 2012, Journal of dairy science.

[15]  Michael E Goddard,et al.  Improved precision of QTL mapping using a nonlinear Bayesian method in a multi-breed population leads to greater accuracy of across-breed genomic predictions , 2014, Genetics Selection Evolution.

[16]  M. Calus,et al.  Assigning breed origin to alleles in crossbred animals , 2016, Genetics Selection Evolution.

[17]  P. VanRaden,et al.  Genetic evaluations for mixed-breed populations. , 2007, Journal of dairy science.

[18]  Jérémie Vandenplas,et al.  Prediction of the reliability of genomic breeding values for crossbred performance , 2017, Genetics Selection Evolution.

[19]  A. C. Sørensen,et al.  Maximizing crossbred performance through purebred genomic selection , 2014, Genetics Selection Evolution.

[20]  Ignacy Misztal,et al.  Ancestral Relationships Using Metafounders: Finite Ancestral Populations and Across Population Relationships , 2015, Genetics.

[21]  P. VanRaden,et al.  Genomic inbreeding and relationships among Holsteins, Jerseys, and Brown Swiss. , 2011, Journal of dairy science.

[22]  P M VanRaden,et al.  Comparison of single-trait to multi-trait national evaluations for yield, health, and fertility. , 2014, Journal of dairy science.

[23]  A. Hess,et al.  Fixed-length haplotypes can improve genomic prediction accuracy in an admixed dairy cattle population , 2017, Genetics Selection Evolution.

[24]  P. VanRaden,et al.  Value of selecting for cow and calf livability , 2016 .

[25]  P. VanRaden,et al.  Genetic evaluation of calving ease for Brown Swiss and Jersey bulls from purebred and crossbred calvings. , 2005, Journal of dairy science.

[26]  B. Harris,et al.  Application of genomic evaluation to dairy cattle in New Zealand. , 2015, Journal of dairy science.

[27]  P. VanRaden,et al.  Selection and management of DNA markers for use in genomic evaluation. , 2010, Journal of dairy science.

[28]  Guosheng Su,et al.  Genomic evaluation of both purebred and crossbred performances , 2014, Genetics Selection Evolution.

[29]  I Misztal,et al.  Genomic predictions in purebreds with a multi-breed genomic relationship matrix. , 2019, Journal of animal science.

[30]  B. Guldbrandtsen,et al.  Genomic predictions based on a joint reference population for the Nordic Red cattle breeds. , 2014, Journal of dairy science.

[31]  I. Misztal,et al.  Crossbreed evaluations in single-step genomic best linear unbiased predictor using adjusted realized relationship matrices. , 2016, Journal of animal science.

[32]  Guosheng Su,et al.  Genomic evaluation of cattle in a multi-breed context ☆ , 2014 .

[33]  Bootstrap study of genome-enabled prediction reliabilities using haplotype blocks across Nordic Red cattle breeds. , 2015, Journal of dairy science.

[34]  B. Guldbrandtsen,et al.  The admixed population structure in Danish Jersey dairy cattle challenges accurate genomic predictions. , 2013, Journal of animal science.

[35]  A Legarra,et al.  Application of single-step genomic evaluation for crossbred performance in pig. , 2016, Journal of animal science.

[36]  M. Sillanpää,et al.  The estimation of genomic relationships using breedwise allele frequencies among animals in multibreed populations. , 2013, Journal of dairy science.

[37]  Ignacy Misztal,et al.  Crossbred evaluations using single-step genomic BLUP and algorithm for proven and young with different sources of data1 , 2019, Journal of animal science.

[38]  I. Strandén,et al.  Use of random regression model as an alternative for multibreed relationship matrix. , 2013, Journal of animal breeding and genetics = Zeitschrift fur Tierzuchtung und Zuchtungsbiologie.

[39]  A Legarra,et al.  Technical note: Genomic evaluation for crossbred performance in a single-step approach with metafounders. , 2017, Journal of animal science.

[40]  R. Fernando,et al.  Genomic selection of purebred animals for crossbred performance in the presence of dominant gene action , 2013, Genetics Selection Evolution.