Personalizing with Human Cognitive Biases

Human cognitive biases are numerous and well established. Due to inherent limitations in our knowledge of the world, and computational constraints, our judgments and decisions do not rigidly adhere to the principle of maximizing expected utility. We frequently employ cognitive shortcuts, ignoring relevant information, and make errors in how we store and retrieve items from memory. Human decisions are additionally influenced by moral, emotional and cultural parameters. People often perceive value in a way that is very different from well-established decision-theoretic frameworks, but much of the work on personalization does not capture human cognitive biases. Our central hypothesis is that a new generation of recommendation systems can be designed by explicitly modeling human cognitive biases such as contrast, decoy, distinction, and framing. We are just now beginning to see explicit non-linear models of human risk perception being incorporated into machine learning algorithms, and we believe this trend will accelerate in the near future. In this paper we review today's recommendation systems, give an analysis of their limitations and make an argument for why future recommendation systems should incorporate explicit models of human cognitive bias.

[1]  J. Neumann,et al.  Theory of games and economic behavior , 1945, 100 Years of Math Milestones.

[2]  M. Allais Le comportement de l'homme rationnel devant le risque : critique des postulats et axiomes de l'ecole americaine , 1953 .

[3]  D. Ellsberg Decision, probability, and utility: Risk, ambiguity, and the Savage axioms , 1961 .

[4]  A. Tversky,et al.  Prospect theory: analysis of decision under risk , 1979 .

[5]  Peter C. Fishburn,et al.  Nonlinear preference and utility theory , 1988 .

[6]  J. Baron Thinking and Deciding , 2023 .

[7]  Benefits for Environmental Decisions,et al.  Choice Under Uncertainty: Problems Solved And Unsolved , 1990 .

[8]  A. Tversky,et al.  Advances in prospect theory: Cumulative representation of uncertainty , 1992 .

[9]  Marcia K. Johnson,et al.  Misremembrance of Options Past: Source Monitoring and Choice , 2000, Psychological science.

[10]  Peter Auer,et al.  Finite-time Analysis of the Multiarmed Bandit Problem , 2002, Machine Learning.

[11]  Thomas Oberlechner Psychology of Judgment and Decision-Making , 2006 .

[12]  International Foundation for Autonomous Agents and MultiAgent Systems ( IFAAMAS ) , 2007 .

[13]  Yehuda Koren,et al.  Matrix Factorization Techniques for Recommender Systems , 2009, Computer.

[14]  Moshe Ben-Akiva,et al.  Adaptive route choices in risky traffic networks: A prospect theory approach , 2010 .

[15]  Wei Chu,et al.  A contextual-bandit approach to personalized news article recommendation , 2010, WWW '10.

[16]  Daniel Chandler,et al.  A Dictionary of Media and Communication , 2011 .

[17]  Philip S. Thomas,et al.  Personalized Ad Recommendation Systems for Life-Time Value Optimization with Guarantees , 2015, IJCAI.

[18]  Michael C. Fu,et al.  Cumulative Prospect Theory Meets Reinforcement Learning: Prediction and Control , 2015, ICML.

[19]  Zheng Wen,et al.  An Interactive Points of Interest Guidance System , 2017, IUI Companion.

[20]  Mathijs de Weerdt,et al.  Capacity-aware Sequential Recommendations , 2018, AAMAS.

[21]  Zheng Wen,et al.  Scalar Posterior Sampling with Applications , 2018, NeurIPS.