Measuring effects of private and shared displays in small-group knowledge sharing processes

Knowledge sharing is important in every team or organization. Various tools are frequently used in meetings to support knowledge sharing, ranging from pen-and-paper to whiteboards and other shared workspaces. This paper reports on a user study that investigated how private and shared displays affect knowledge sharing processes in co-located meetings. Three setups were compared in a hidden-profile experiment: a distributed system providing a shared display and laptops (Note&Share), a regular whiteboard and pen-and-paper. The results show several advantages of the distributed system. For example, the group was more confident in the solution when using Note&Share. Furthermore the number of shared arguments was significantly closer to the correct number, which suggests that misunderstandings occurred less frequently. Finally some interesting effects were observed, which we claim to be connected to the availability of pen-and-paper in all conditions. Therefore, we discuss the observed effects as well as general lessons learned from this experiment.

[1]  Meredith Ringel Morris,et al.  Exploring the effects of group size and table size on interactions with tabletop shared-display groupware , 2004, CSCW.

[2]  Gloria Gomez,et al.  CmapTools: A Knowledge Modeling and Sharing Environment , 2004 .

[3]  Yvonne Rogers,et al.  Collaborating around vertical and horizontal large interactive displays: which way is best? , 2004, Interact. Comput..

[4]  Andrew Parker,et al.  Knowing What We Know: Supporting Knowledge Creation and Sharing in Social Networks , 2001 .

[5]  Hao Jiang,et al.  WeSpace: the design development and deployment of a walk-up and share multi-surface visual collaboration system , 2009, CHI.

[6]  Karsten Stegmann,et al.  Facilitating argumentative knowledge construction with computer-supported collaboration scripts , 2007, Int. J. Comput. Support. Collab. Learn..

[7]  Carl Gutwin,et al.  The effects of interaction technique on coordination in tabletop groupware , 2007, GI '07.

[8]  Andreas Paepcke,et al.  TeamTag: exploring centralized versus replicated controls for co-located tabletop groupware , 2006, CHI.

[9]  Marisa E. Campbell CSCW 2004 , 2004, INTR.

[10]  Dominique Guinard,et al.  Extending Mobile Devices with Spatially Arranged Gateways to Pervasive Services , 2007 .

[11]  Desney S. Tan,et al.  Impromptu: a new interaction framework for supporting collaboration in multiple display environments and its field evaluation for co-located software development , 2008, CHI.

[12]  G. Stasser,et al.  Discovery of hidden profiles by decision-making groups: Solving a problem versus making a judgment. , 1992 .

[13]  Karsten Stegmann,et al.  Learning to argue online: Scripted groups surpass individuals (unscripted groups do not) , 2010, Comput. Hum. Behav..