Quality of life in ALS is maintained as physical function declines

Objectives: To study patients with ALS to determine how physical function, quality of life (QOL), and spirituality or religiousness change over time, and what relationship these changes have to one another. Methods: Sixty patients with ALS were studied prospectively. They were assessed at baseline, 3 months, and 6 months, using questionnaires designed to measure general quality of life (McGill Quality of Life questionnaire), religiosity (Idler Index of Religiosity), ALS-specific health-related quality of life (SIP/ALS-19), and ALS-specific function (ALS functional rating scale). Results: A two-way repeated measures multivariate analysis of variance revealed that both the passage of time and the specific QOL scales used were factors in predicting patient quality of life (F[1, 59]= 9.87, p < 0.003 and F[3, 177]= 16.90, p < 0.001) Despite a progressive decline in physical function as measured by the ALS-specific function score, the general QOL and religiosity scores changed little. In contrast, the ALS-specific health-related QOL score declined in parallel with the ALS-specific function score. Conclusions: QOL in patients with ALS appears to be independent of physical function, which agrees with a previous cross-sectional study. The ALS-specific health-related QOL score is primarily a measure of physical function. QOL instruments that assess spiritual, religious, and psychological factors produce different results than those obtained using measures of physical function alone.

[1]  P. Reed,et al.  Spirituality and well-being in terminally ill hospitalized adults. , 1987, Research in nursing & health.

[2]  D. Cella,et al.  A case for including spirituality in quality of life measurement in oncology , 1999, Psycho-oncology.

[3]  S. Kasl,et al.  Religion, Disability, Depression, and the Timing of Death , 1991, American Journal of Sociology.

[4]  E. Bruera,et al.  Validity of the McGill Quality of Life Questionnaire in the palliative care setting: a multi-centre Canadian study demonstrating the importance of the existential domain , 1997, Palliative medicine.

[5]  C. M. Fitzpatrick,et al.  Exploring the relationships among spiritual well‐being, quality of life, and psychological adjustment in women with breast cancer , 1999, Psycho-oncology.

[6]  T M Gill,et al.  A critical appraisal of the quality of quality-of-life measurements. , 1994, JAMA.

[7]  J. Petajan,et al.  Relationship of the Tufts Quantitative Neuromuscular Exam (TQNE) and the Sickness Impact Profile (SIP) in measuring progression of ALS , 1996, Neurology.

[8]  T L Munsat,et al.  Quantitative motor assessment in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis , 1986, Neurology.

[9]  Z. Simmons,et al.  Quality of life in ALS depends on factors other than strength and physical function , 2000, Neurology.

[10]  B. Mount,et al.  Existential well‐being is an important determinant of quality of life: Evidence from the McGill quality of life questionnaire , 1996, Cancer.

[11]  B. Mount,et al.  The McGill Quality of Life Questionnaire: a measure of quality of life appropriate for people with advanced disease. A preliminary study of validity and acceptability , 1995, Palliative medicine.

[12]  B. Mount,et al.  Quality of life in HIV disease as measured by the McGill Quality of Life Questionnaire , 1996, AIDS.

[13]  E M Backett,et al.  A quantitative approach to perceived health status: a validation study. , 1980, Journal of epidemiology and community health.

[14]  M. Bergner,et al.  The Sickness Impact Profile: Development and Final Revision of a Health Status Measure , 1981, Medical care.