Sensory feedback for upper limb prostheses.

In this chapter, we discuss the neurophysiological basis of how to provide sensory feedback to users with an upper limb prosthesis and discuss some of the theoretical issues that need to be considered when directly stimulating neurons in the somatosensory system. We focus on technologies that are currently available and discuss approaches that are most likely to succeed in providing natural perception from the artificial hand to the user. First, we discuss the advantages and disadvantages of providing feedback by stimulating directly the remaining afferents that originally innervated the arm and hand. In particular, we pay close attention to the normal functional roles that the peripheral afferents play in perception. What are the consequences and implications of stimulating these afferents? We then discuss whether it is reasonable to stimulate neurons in the ascending pathways that carry the information from the afferents to the cortex or directly in neurons in the primary somatosensory cortex. We show that for some modalities there are advantages for stimulating in the spinal cord, while for others it is advantageous to stimulate directly in the somatosensory cortex. Finally, we discuss results from a current experiment in which we used electrical stimuli in primary somatosensory cortex to restore the percept of the intensity of a mechanical probe indented into the hand. The results suggest that the simple percept of stimulus intensity can be provided to the animal from a single finger using four electrodes. We propose that significantly more electrodes will be needed to reproduce more complex aspects of tactile perception.

[1]  D. Ginty,et al.  Molecular Identification of Rapidly Adapting Mechanoreceptors and Their Developmental Dependence on Ret Signaling , 2009, Neuron.

[2]  Kenneth O. Johnson,et al.  Review: Neural Coding and the Basic Law of Psychophysics , 2002, The Neuroscientist : a review journal bringing neurobiology, neurology and psychiatry.

[3]  J. Semmes,et al.  Behavioral consequences of selective subtotal ablations in the postcentral gyrus of Macaca mulatta. , 1974, Brain research.

[4]  Andrew S. Whitford,et al.  Cortical control of a prosthetic arm for self-feeding , 2008, Nature.

[5]  S. Hsiao SIMILARITIES BETWEEN TOUCH AND VISION , 1998 .

[6]  Lynette A Jones,et al.  Tactile communication systems optimizing the display of information. , 2011, Progress in brain research.

[7]  J. Craig,et al.  Texture perception through direct and indirect touch: An analysis of perceptual space for tactile textures in two modes of exploration , 2007, Somatosensory & motor research.

[8]  N A Fitzsimmons,et al.  Primate Reaching Cued by Multichannel Spatiotemporal Cortical Microstimulation , 2007, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[9]  O. Franzén,et al.  Somesthesis and the Neurobiology of the Somatosensory Cortex , 1996, Advances in Life Sciences.

[10]  W. Penfield,et al.  SOMATIC MOTOR AND SENSORY REPRESENTATION IN THE CEREBRAL CORTEX OF MAN AS STUDIED BY ELECTRICAL STIMULATION , 1937 .

[11]  N.V. Thakor,et al.  Decoding Individuated Finger Movements Using Volume-Constrained Neuronal Ensembles in the M1 Hand Area , 2008, IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering.

[12]  B. Edin,et al.  Skin strain patterns provide kinaesthetic information to the human central nervous system. , 1995, The Journal of physiology.

[13]  Kenneth O. Johnson,et al.  Form processing and attention effects in the somatosensory system , 1996 .

[14]  S. Hsiao Central mechanisms of tactile shape perception , 2008, Current Opinion in Neurobiology.

[15]  Jeffrey M Yau,et al.  Analogous intermediate shape coding in vision and touch , 2009, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[16]  R. Romo,et al.  Sensing without Touching Psychophysical Performance Based on Cortical Microstimulation , 2000, Neuron.

[17]  B. Edin,et al.  Discharges in Human Muscle Receptor Afferents during Block Grasping , 2008, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[18]  R. Johansson,et al.  Tactile sensibility in the human hand: relative and absolute densities of four types of mechanoreceptive units in glabrous skin. , 1979, The Journal of physiology.

[19]  J. P. Vroom,et al.  Advances in Psychology. , 1998, Canadian Medical Association journal.

[20]  R. Johansson,et al.  Detection of tactile stimuli. Thresholds of afferent units related to psychophysical thresholds in the human hand. , 1979, The Journal of physiology.

[21]  S. S. Hsiao,et al.  Coding of Object Shape and Texture , 2020, The Senses: A Comprehensive Reference.

[22]  M. Swiontkowski,et al.  Redirection of cutaneous sensation from the hand to the chest skin of human amputees with targeted reinnervation , 2009 .

[23]  R. Romo,et al.  Somatosensory discrimination based on cortical microstimulation , 1998, Nature.

[24]  John W. Lane,et al.  Representation of orientation in the somatosensory system , 2002, Behavioural Brain Research.

[25]  D J Weber,et al.  Microstimulation of primary afferent neurons in the L7 dorsal root ganglia using multielectrode arrays in anesthetized cats: thresholds and recruitment properties , 2009, Journal of neural engineering.

[26]  J. Craig,et al.  Shape Invariant Coding of Motion Direction in Somatosensory Cortex , 2010, PLoS biology.