A novel Gaussian Sum Filter Method for accurate solution to the nonlinear filtering problem

The paper presents two methods of updating the weights of a Gaussian mixture to account for the density propagation within a data assimilation setting. The evolution of the first two moments of the Gaussian components is given by the linearized model of the system. When observations are available, both the moments and the weights are updated to obtain a better approximation to the a posteriori probability density function. This can be done through a classical Gaussian sum filter. When the measurement model offers little or no information in updating the states of the system, better estimates may be obtained by updating the weights of the mixands to account for the propagation effect on the probability density function. The update of the forecast weights proves to be important in pure forecast settings, when the frequency of the measurements is low, when the uncertainty of the measurements is large or the measurement model is ambiguous making the system unobservable. Updating the weights not only provides us with better estimates but also with a more accurate probability density function. The numerical results show that updating the weights in the propagation step not only gives better estimates between the observations but also gives superior performance for systems when the measurements are ambiguous.

[1]  Arthur Gelb,et al.  Applied Optimal Estimation , 1974 .

[2]  P. Spanos,et al.  Random vibration and statistical linearization , 1990 .

[3]  Timothy J. Robinson,et al.  Sequential Monte Carlo Methods in Practice , 2003 .

[4]  H. Sorenson,et al.  Recursive bayesian estimation using gaussian sums , 1971 .

[5]  Branko Ristic,et al.  Beyond the Kalman Filter: Particle Filters for Tracking Applications , 2004 .

[6]  Herman Bruyninckx,et al.  Kalman filters for non-linear systems: a comparison of performance , 2004 .

[7]  Kazufumi Ito,et al.  Gaussian filters for nonlinear filtering problems , 2000, IEEE Trans. Autom. Control..

[8]  Yuanxin Wu,et al.  An Improvement to Unscented Transformation , 2004, Australian Conference on Artificial Intelligence.

[9]  R. N. Iyengar,et al.  Study of the Random Vibration of Nonlinear Systems by the Gaussian Closure Technique , 1978 .

[10]  Hugh F. Durrant-Whyte,et al.  A new method for the nonlinear transformation of means and covariances in filters and estimators , 2000, IEEE Trans. Autom. Control..

[11]  Thia Kirubarajan,et al.  Estimation with Applications to Tracking and Navigation: Theory, Algorithms and Software , 2001 .

[12]  Puneet Singla,et al.  A gaussian function network for uncertainty propagation through nonlinear dynamical system , 2008 .

[13]  H. Sorenson,et al.  Nonlinear Bayesian estimation using Gaussian sum approximations , 1972 .

[14]  J. Junkins,et al.  Optimal Estimation of Dynamic Systems , 2004 .

[15]  Jeffrey K. Uhlmann,et al.  Unscented filtering and nonlinear estimation , 2004, Proceedings of the IEEE.

[16]  A. Honkela Approximating nonlinear transformations of probability distributions for nonlinear independent component analysis , 2004, 2004 IEEE International Joint Conference on Neural Networks (IEEE Cat. No.04CH37541).

[17]  A. Jazwinski Stochastic Processes and Filtering Theory , 1970 .

[18]  J. Huang,et al.  Curse of dimensionality and particle filters , 2003, 2003 IEEE Aerospace Conference Proceedings (Cat. No.03TH8652).

[19]  S Julier,et al.  Comment on "A new method for the nonlinear transformation of means and covariances in filters and estimators" - Reply , 2002 .

[20]  Jun S. Liu,et al.  Mixture Kalman filters , 2000 .

[21]  Petros G. Voulgaris,et al.  On optimal ℓ∞ to ℓ∞ filtering , 1995, Autom..

[22]  T. Singh,et al.  Uncertainty Propagation for Nonlinear Dynamic Systems Using Gaussian Mixture Models , 2008 .