Surface forms and grammatical functions: past tense and passive participle use by children with specific language impairment.

Children with specific language impairment (SLI) use past tense -ed in fewer obligatory contexts than younger normally developing children matched for mean length of utterance (MLU). In this study, the use of passive participle -ed (e.g., kissed in The frog got kissed by the kitty) as well as past tense -ed was examined in children with SLI, normally developing children matched for age (ND-A), and normally developing children matched for MLU (ND-MLU). The children with SLI used both past tense -ed and passive participle -ed in fewer obligatory contexts than bath the ND-A and the ND-MLU children. Only the children with SLI had greater difficulty with past tense -ed than with passive participle -ed. The pattern of findings indicates that the surface properties of -ed cannot adequately account for the past tense -ed difficulty shown by the children with SLI. However, the fact that the children with SLI were less consistant than the ND-MLU children in using passive participle -ed suggests that either the surface properties of -ed are responsible for a portion of the difficulty or these children have a separate, non-tense-related deficit in the area of verb morphology.

[1]  Heather K. J. van der Lely,et al.  SLI in Children: Movement, Economy, and Deficits in the Computational-Syntactic System , 1998 .

[2]  Harald Clahsen,et al.  Child Language and Developmental Dysphasia: Linguistic studies of the acquisition of German , 1991 .

[3]  Laurence B. Leonard,et al.  Morphological Deficits in Children With Specific Language Impairment: The Status of Features in the Underlying Grammar , 1992 .

[4]  Heather K. J. van der Lely,et al.  Specifically language impaired and normally developing children : Verbal passive vs. adjectival passive sentence interpretation , 1996 .

[5]  Irving Lorge,et al.  Columbia mental maturity scale , 1954 .

[6]  Andrew Radford,et al.  Syntactic Theory and the Structure of English: A Minimalist Approach , 1997 .

[7]  S. Crain.  Investigations In Universal Grammar , 1998 .

[8]  Andrew Radford,et al.  Syntactic Theory and the Structure of English: Index , 1997 .

[9]  L B Leonard,et al.  Grammatical morphology and the lexicon in children with specific language impairment. , 1999, Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR.

[10]  Harald Clahsen,et al.  Formal features in impaired grammars: A comparison of English and German SLI children , 1997, Journal of Neurolinguistics.

[11]  S. C. Howell,et al.  Proceedings of the 24th Annual Boston University Conference on Child Development , 2003 .

[12]  Steven L. Miller,et al.  Language Comprehension in Language-Learning Impaired Children Improved with Acoustically Modified Speech , 1996, Science.

[13]  Jacob Cohen.  Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences , 1969, The SAGE Encyclopedia of Research Design.

[14]  Susan A. Sullivan,et al.  Leiter International Performance Scale–Revised , 1998 .

[15]  K. Wexler,et al.  Toward tense as a clinical marker of specific language impairment in English-speaking children. , 1996, Journal of speech and hearing research.

[16]  J. D. Jong,et al.  Specific language impairment in Dutch , 1999 .

[17]  K. Wexler,et al.  Acquisition of irregular past tense by children with specific language impairment. , 2000, Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR.

[18]  L B Leonard,et al.  Grammatical morphology and speech perception in children with specific language impairment. , 1992, Journal of speech and hearing research.

[19]  Harald Clahsen,et al.  Dissociations in SLI children's inflectional systems: A study of participle inflection and subject-verb-agreement , 1993 .

[20]  P Tallal,et al.  Developmental aphasia: rate of auditory processing and selective impairment of consonant perception. , 1974, Neuropsychologia.

[21]  L B Leonard,et al.  Three accounts of the grammatical morpheme difficulties of English-speaking children with specific language impairment. , 1997, Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR.

[22]  Kenneth Wexler,et al.  Subject Case in Children With SLI and Unaffected Controls: Evidence for the Agr/Tns Omission Model , 1998 .

[23]  K. Wexler,et al.  Verb movement: Finiteness and head movement in early child grammars , 1994 .

[24]  Laurence B. Leonard,et al.  Language learnability and specific language impairment in children , 1989, Applied Psycholinguistics.

[25]  Heather K. J. van der Lely,et al.  Canonical linking rules: forward versus reverse linking in normally developing and specifically language-impaired children , 1994, Cognition.

[26]  J. Oetting,et al.  Past-tense marking by children with and without specific language impairment. , 1997, Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR.

[27]  Geert Booij,et al.  Yearbook of Morphology 1992 , 1993 .

[28]  Steven Pinker,et al.  Language learnability and language development , 1985 .

[29]  M L Rice,et al.  Specific language impairment as a period of extended optional infinitive. , 1995, Journal of speech and hearing research.

[30]  V. Marchman,et al.  Morphological productivity in children with normal language and SLI: a study of the English past tense. , 1999, Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR.

[31]  M L Rice,et al.  Tense over time: the longitudinal course of tense acquisition in children with specific language impairment. , 1998, Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR.

[32]  Paula Tallal,et al.  The relationship between auditory temporal analysis and receptive language development: Evidence from studies of developmental language disorder , 1985, Neuropsychologia.

[33]  H. Clahsen,et al.  The grammatical characterization of developmental dysphasia , 1989 .

[34]  L B Leonard,et al.  Specific language impairment in Swedish: the status of verb morphology and word order. , 2000, Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR.