Significance of PQ interval in acquisition of coronary multidetector row computed tomography.

BACKGROUND Since image quality obtained in the mid-diastolic [or slow filling (SF)] phase is generally superior to end-systolic image in coronary multidetector row computed tomography (MDCT), low heart rate (HR) comprises the most important factor for acquisition of high-quality images. However, despite HR <70 and optimum breath-hold, sometimes high quality images cannot be obtained in SF. We assessed the significance of PQ interval in acquisition of coronary MDCT. METHODS AND RESULTS Of 541 consecutive patients who underwent coronary MDCT, 7 patients with incomplete breath-hold, 62 HR ≥70, and 70 arrhythmias were excluded. The remaining 402 patients (M: 222, 66±11 years), including 38 with first-degree atrioventricular block (1° AVB, PQ >200 ms) were evaluated. RR and PQ were measured on electrocardiogram and systolic and SF phase with 4-chamber cine cardiac computed tomography. SF significantly (p<0.0001) correlated with RR (SF=-471+0.720RR, r=0.887) in all subjects. The SF of without 1° AVB (292±97 ms) was significantly (p<0.0147) longer than that of with 1° AVB (251±121 ms), although RR was not significantly different between the two groups. The SF/RR of without 1° AVB (27.2±6.1%) was also significantly (p<0.0001) higher than that of with 1° AVB (22.7±8.0%). The coefficient of correlation between (RR-PQ) and SF [r=0.915, p<0.0001, SF=-362+0.742(RR-PQ)] was significantly (p<0.034) higher than that of correlation between RR and SF in all subjects. The SF of rank A image quality was significantly longer than that of rank B (p<0.0001) or rank C (p=0.0042). In critical HR (60-69 bpm), the optimum phase was ES in 7/139 patients without 1° AVB, and SF in 3/13 patients with 1° AVB (chi(2), p<0.0416). CONCLUSION Since SF depends on (RR-PQ), if PQ is long in critical HR, it might be difficult to reconstruct high quality images in the SF phase.

[1]  Thomas Flohr,et al.  Dual-Source Computed Tomography: Advances of Improved Temporal Resolution in Coronary Plaque Imaging , 2007, Investigative radiology.

[2]  N. Nitta,et al.  Multidetector-Row Computed Tomography Coronary Angiography , 2007 .

[3]  Effect of the Reconstruction Window Obtained at the Isovolumic Relaxation Period on the Image Quality in Electrocardiographic-Gated 16-Multidetector-Row Computed Tomography Coronary Angiography Studies , 2006, Journal of computer assisted tomography.

[4]  Michael Grass,et al.  Noninvasive coronary angiography with 16-detector row CT: effect of heart rate. , 2005, Radiology.

[5]  T. Kodama,et al.  ECG-edit function in multidetector-row computed tomography coronary arteriography for patients with arrhythmias. , 2008, Circulation journal : official journal of the Japanese Circulation Society.

[6]  S. Miura,et al.  Usefulness of the evaluation of stent fracture by 64-multi-detector row computed tomography. , 2008, Journal of cardiology.

[7]  P. Rogalla,et al.  [Spatial and temporal resolution with 16-slice computed tomography for cardiac imaging]. , 2003, RoFo : Fortschritte auf dem Gebiete der Rontgenstrahlen und der Nuklearmedizin.

[8]  Simon Wildermuth,et al.  Noninvasive coronary angiography with 64-section CT: effect of average heart rate and heart rate variability on image quality. , 2006, Radiology.

[9]  D. Andreini,et al.  Feasibility and diagnostic accuracy of 16-slice multidetector computed tomography coronary angiography in 500 consecutive patients: critical role of heart rate , 2007, The International Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging.

[10]  Karl Stierstorfer,et al.  Segmented multiple plane reconstruction: a novel approximate reconstruction scheme for multi-slice spiral CT. , 2002, Physics in medicine and biology.

[11]  R. Merges,et al.  Comparison of myocardial bridging by dual-source CT with conventional coronary angiography. , 2008, Circulation journal : official journal of the Japanese Circulation Society.

[12]  K. Shimada,et al.  Comparison of 64-slice multi-detector computed tomography coronary angiography between asymptomatic, type 2 diabetes mellitus and impaired glucose tolerance patients. , 2008, Journal of cardiology.

[13]  E. Fishman,et al.  64-MDCT angiography of the coronary arteries: nationwide survey of patient preparation practice. , 2008, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[14]  Thomas J Vogl,et al.  Multi-detector row CT coronary angiography: influence of reconstruction technique and heart rate on image quality. , 2006, Radiology.

[15]  N. Nitta,et al.  Multidetector-row computed tomography coronary angiography: optimization of image reconstruction phase according to the heart rate. , 2007, Circulation journal : official journal of the Japanese Circulation Society.

[16]  Influence of heart rate in the selection of the optimal reconstruction window in routine clinical multislice coronary angiography , 2008, La radiologia medica.

[17]  Herbert Bruder,et al.  Advances in cardiac imaging with 16-section CT systems. , 2003, Academic radiology.

[18]  Borut Marincek,et al.  Optimal image reconstruction intervals for non-invasive coronary angiography with 64-slice CT , 2006, European Radiology.