Length of Utterance, in Morphemes or in Words?: MLU3-w, a Reliable Measure of Language Development in Early Basque

The mean length of utterace (MLU), which was proposed by Brown (1973) as a better index for language development in children than age, has been regularly reported in case studies as well as in cross-sectional studies on early spontaneous language production. Despite the reliability of MLU as a measure of (morpho-)syntactic development having been called into question, its extensive use in language acquisition studies highlights its utility not only for intra- and inter-individual comparison in monolingual language acquisition, but also for cross-linguistic assessment and comparison of bilinguals' early language development (Müller, 1993; Yip and Matthews, 2006; Meisel, 2011). An additional issue concerns whether MLU should be measured in words (MLU-w) or morphemes (MLU-m), the latter option being the most difficult to gauge, since new challenges have arisen regarding how to count zero morphemes, suppletive and fused morphemes. The different criteria have consequences, especially when comparing development in languages with diverging morphological complexity. A variant of MLU, the MLU3, which is calculated out of the three longest sentences produced (MLU3-w and MLU3-m), is included among the subscales of expressive language development in CDI parental reports (Fenson et al., 1993, 2007). The aim of the study is to investigate the consistency and utility of MLU3-w and MLU3-m as a measure for (morpho-)syntactic development in Basque, an agglutinative language. To that end, cross-sectional data were obtained using either the Basque CDI-2 instrument (16- to 30-month-olds) or the Basque CDI-3 (30- to 50-month-olds). The results of analyzing reports on over 1,200 children show three main findings. First, MLU3-w and MLU3-m can report equally well on very young children's development. Second, the strong correlations found between MLU3 and expressive vocabulary in the Basque CDI-2 and CDI-3 instruments, as well as between MLU3 and both nominal and verbal morphology scales, confirm the consistency not only of MLU3 but also of the two Basque CDI instruments. Finally, both MLU3-w and MLU3-m subscales appear sensitive to input after age 2, which emphasizes their utility for identifying developmental patterns in Basque bilinguals.

[1]  Terry K Koo,et al.  A Guideline of Selecting and Reporting Intraclass Correlation Coefficients for Reliability Research. , 2016, Journal of chiropractic medicine.

[2]  Shanley Allen,et al.  Calculating mean length of utterance for eastern Canadian Inuktitut , 2015 .

[3]  Frederick J. Newmeyer,et al.  Measuring Grammatical Complexity , 2014 .

[4]  Erika Hoff,et al.  Properties of dual language input that shape bilingual development and properties of environments that shape dual language input , 2014 .

[5]  Itziar Idiazabal.  Haur txikien hizkuntz heldutasuna neurtzeko baliapide bat: esaldien bataz besteko luzera EBBL edo MLU , 2013 .

[6]  Policy Statement.  Patient- and Family-Centered Care and the Pediatrician’s Role , 2013, Pediatric Clinical Practice Guidelines & Policies.

[7]  P. Guijarro-Fuentes,et al.  Clitics in L1 bilingual acquisition , 2012 .

[8]  P. Guijarro-Fuentes,et al.  Collecting data and measuring competence , 2012 .

[9]  E. Thordardottir.  The relationship between bilingual exposure and vocabulary development , 2011 .

[10]  E. Hoff,et al.  Dual language exposure and early bilingual development* , 2011, Journal of Child Language.

[11]  Jürgen M. Meisel.  Bilingual language acquisition and theories of diachronic change: Bilingualism as cause and effect of grammatical change* , 2010, Bilingualism: Language and Cognition.

[12]  Denise Perpich,et al.  Mean length of utterance levels in 6-month intervals for children 3 to 9 years with and without language impairments. , 2010, Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR.

[13]  Tanja Kupisch,et al.  Dominance, mixing, and cross-linguistic influence: On their relation in bilingual development , 2008 .

[14]  M. Ezeizabarrena,et al.  Chapter 4. Influence of the Linguistic Environment on the Development of the Lexicon and Grammar of Basque Bilingual Children , 2007 .

[15]  B. Conboy,et al.  Chapter 11. Utterance Length Measures for Spanish-speaking Toddlers: The Morpheme versus Word Issue Revisited , 2007 .

[16]  D. O'Neill.  The language use inventory for young children: a parent-report measure of pragmatic language development for 18- to 47-month-old children. , 2007, Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR.

[17]  Virginia Yip,et al.  Assessing Language Dominance in Bilingual Acquisition: A Case for Mean Length Utterance Differentials , 2006 .

[18]  Matthew D. Parker,et al.  A comparative study between mean length of utterance in morphemes (MLUm) and mean length of utterance in words (MLUw) , 2005 .

[19]  Bonnie Worth Johnson,et al.  A closer look at MLU: What does it really measure? , 2005, Clinical linguistics & phonetics.

[20]  V. Marchman,et al.  The language-specific nature of grammatical development: evidence from bilingual language learners. , 2004, Developmental science.

[21]  J. Johnston.  An alternate MLU calculation: magnitude and variability of effects. , 2001, Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR.

[22]  María Pilar Larrañaga.  Ergative Sprachen, akkusative Sprachen: Der Erwerb des Kasus bei bilingualen Kindern , 2000 .

[23]  J. Reznick,et al.  Short-form versions of the MacArthur Communicative Development Inventories , 2000, Applied Psycholinguistics.

[24]  Jürgen M. Meisel,et al.  Bilingual First Language Acquisition: French and German Grammatical Development. (Language Acquisition and Language Disorders, Vol. 7) , 1997 .

[25]  D. Oller,et al.  The relation of input factors to lexical learning by bilingual infants , 1997, Applied Psycholinguistics.

[26]  Catherine E. Snow,et al.  Predictors of MLU: semantic and morphological developments , 1996 .

[27]  T. Hickey,et al.  Mean length of utterance and the acquisition of Irish , 1991, Journal of Child Language.

[28]  Jürgen M. Meisel.  Principles of Universal Grammar and Strategies of Language Learning: Some Similarities and Differencies between First and Second Language Acquisition , 1991 .

[29]  Derek Bickerton,et al.  The Pace of Syntactic Acquisition , 1991 .

[30]  Roger S. Brown,et al.  Development of the First Language in the Human Species. , 1973 .

[31]  Natascha Müller,et al.  Mélanges interpropositionnels chez les enfants bilingues franco-allemands: Est-ce vraiment du code-switching ? , 2016 .

[32]  Andoni Barreña Agirrebeitia,et al.  Haur euskaldunen komunikazio-garapena neurtzen 30-50 hilabete bitartean: MacArthur-Bates CDI-III tresnaren euskal bertsioa , 2014 .

[33]  John T. E. Richardson,et al.  Eta Squared and Partial Eta Squared as Measures of Effect Size in Educational Research. , 2011 .

[34]  Roma Wieczorek.  Using MLU to study early language development in English , 2010 .

[35]  Natascha Müller,et al.  Zum simultanen Erwerb des Deutschen und des Französischen bei (un)ausgeglichen bilingualen Kindern , 2003 .

[36]  N. C. Andreasen.  Brave New Brain: Conquering Mental Illness in the , 2001 .

[37]  María Cristina Elosegui Aduriz.  Kasu eta preposizioen jabekuntza-garapena haur elebidun batengan , 1998 .

[38]  Maria José Ezeizabarrena Segurola.  Adquisición de la morfología verbal en euskera y castellano por niños bilingües , 1996 .

[39]  Andoni Barreña Agirrebeitia.  Gramatikaren jabekuntza-garapena eta haur euskaldunak , 1995 .

[40]  David M. Zar,et al.  Mini-ATMizer User's Guide and Technical Manual , 1993 .

[41]  Jacob Cohen.  QUANTITATIVE METHODS IN PSYCHOLOGY A Power Primer , 1992 .

[42]  M.M. Nice,et al.  Length of sentences as a criterion of a child’s progress in speech , 1925 .