Sound Localization in Noise by Gerbils and Humans

Detection and localization of a target sound in the presence of concurrent, spatially distributed masking sounds is one of the most challenging tasks for the mammalian auditory system. Previous studies demonstrated that the ability to localize signals is decreased by interfering noise. In order to directly compare the behavioral performance in a signal processing task in noise between gerbils and humans in the free sound field, we quantified their localization ability for a low-frequency signal in the presence of six masking noise sources surrounding the subject. Thresholds were measured both for masking noises that were correlated or uncorrelated across the masking sources. Overall, the gerbils required a higher signal/noise ratio to detect the low-frequency signal than the humans; that is, the behavioral performance of the gerbils was considerably worse than that of the humans. Moreover, switching from maskers that were uncorrelated across the masking sources to correlated maskers resulted in more masking in gerbils but in a release from masking in humans. These results would suggest that the gerbil may not be a good animal model for binaural processing. However, simulations of the localization thresholds in a numerical model of binaural processing in gerbils and humans reveal that both the inferior overall performance in gerbils and the opposite effect of masker correlation on the detection thresholds can be attributed to the smaller head size and the wider peripheral auditory filters in gerbils. Thus, the current data indicate that the binaural processor itself (i.e., the evaluation of signals coming from the two ears) is equally sensitive in gerbils and humans. However, the physical limitations imposed by the small head prevent the gerbil from performing equally well in the current paradigm.

[1]  O. S. Wakeford,et al.  Detection of binaurally masked tones by the cat. , 1974, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[2]  E. C. Cmm,et al.  on the Recognition of Speech, with , 2008 .

[3]  B. Grothe,et al.  Precise inhibition is essential for microsecond interaural time difference coding , 2002, Nature.

[4]  L H Carney,et al.  Studies of binaural detection in the rabbit (Oryctolagus cuniculus) with Pavlovian conditioning. , 2001, Behavioral neuroscience.

[5]  Brian B. Bishop,et al.  Acoustic recordings in human ear canals to sounds at different locations , 2010, Otolaryngology--head and neck surgery : official journal of American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery.

[6]  Lutz Wiegrebe,et al.  Localization dominance and the effect of frequency in the Mongolian Gerbil, Meriones unguiculatus , 2010, Journal of Comparative Physiology A.

[7]  Marla M. Holt,et al.  Spatial release from masking of aerial tones in pinnipeds. , 2007, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[8]  J. Blauert Spatial Hearing: The Psychophysics of Human Sound Localization , 1983 .

[9]  J. Inoue Effects of stimulus intensity on sound localization in the horizontal and upper-hemispheric median plane. , 2001, Journal of UOEH.

[10]  B. Grothe,et al.  Psychophysical and Physiological Evidence for Fast Binaural Processing , 2008, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[11]  D R Moore,et al.  Free-field binaural unmasking in ferrets. , 1994, Behavioral neuroscience.

[12]  J. C. R. Licklider,et al.  The Influence of Interaural Phase Relations upon the Masking of Speech by White Noise , 1948 .

[13]  Benedikt Grothe,et al.  Experience-dependent refinement of inhibitory inputs to auditory coincidence-detector neurons , 2002, Nature Neuroscience.

[14]  W. M. Rabinowitz,et al.  Auditory localization of nearby sources. Head-related transfer functions. , 1999, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[15]  J. Ison,et al.  The effect of spatial separation of signal and noise on masking in the free field as a function of signal frequency and age in the mouse. , 1998, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[16]  H. Heffner,et al.  Sound localization and use of binaural cues by the gerbil (Meriones unguiculatus). , 1988, Behavioral neuroscience.

[17]  R. Gilkey,et al.  Sound localization in noise: the effect of signal-to-noise ratio. , 1996, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[18]  Axel Michelsen,et al.  The role of pressure difference reception in the directional hearing of budgerigars (Melopsittacus undulatus) , 2006, Journal of Comparative Physiology A.

[19]  C Trahiotis,et al.  On the use of the normalized correlation as an index of interaural envelope correlation. , 1996, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[20]  Brian R Glasberg,et al.  Derivation of auditory filter shapes from notched-noise data , 1990, Hearing Research.

[21]  Hirsh Ij Binaural summation and interaural inhibition as a function of the level of masking noise. , 1948 .

[22]  Klaus Hartung,et al.  Localization in the Presence of a Distracter and Reverberation in the Frontal Horizontal Plane. I. Psychoacoustical Data , 2002 .

[23]  T Dau,et al.  A quantitative model of the "effective" signal processing in the auditory system. I. Model structure. , 1996, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[24]  C. Lorenzi,et al.  Sound localization in noise in normal-hearing listeners. , 1997, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[25]  L. Carney,et al.  Sound-localization ability of the Mongolian gerbil (Meriones unguiculatus) in a task with a simplified response map , 2011, Hearing Research.

[26]  E. C. Cherry Some Experiments on the Recognition of Speech, with One and with Two Ears , 1953 .

[27]  Neuronal response to cochlear distortion products in the anteroventral cochlear nucleus of the gerbil. , 1999, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[28]  B. Moore,et al.  Modeling the additivity of nonsimultaneous masking , 1994, Hearing Research.

[29]  Marla M. Holt,et al.  Localization of aerial broadband noise by pinnipeds. , 2004, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[30]  I. Hirsh,et al.  Binaural summation and interaural inhibition as a function of the level of masking noise. , 1948, The American journal of psychology.

[31]  R. Dooling,et al.  Free-field binaural unmasking in budgerigars (Melopsittacus undulatus). , 1997, Behavioral neuroscience.

[32]  J. C. Middlebrooks,et al.  Listener weighting of cues for lateral angle: the duplex theory of sound localization revisited. , 2002, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[33]  Marcel van der Heijden,et al.  Response Characteristics in the Apex of the Gerbil Cochlea Studied Through Auditory Nerve Recordings , 2011, Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology.

[34]  A. Ryan,et al.  Hearing sensitivity of the mongolian gerbil, Meriones unguiculatis. , 1976, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.