Can active navigation be as good as driving? A comparison of spatial memory in drivers and backseat drivers.

When driving a vehicle, either the driver or a passenger (henceforth: backseat driver) may be responsible for navigation. Research on active navigation, primarily addressed in virtual environments, suggests that controlling navigation is more central for spatial learning than controlling movement. To test this assumption in a real-world scenario, we manipulated movement control through seating participants in the front or the back position of a tandem bike, and navigation control by presenting differently detailed maps to participants unfamiliar (Experiment 1) or familiar (Experiment 2) with an environment. Landmark knowledge was tested with recognition tasks. For participants unfamiliar with the environment (Experiment 1), passive navigation enabled better landmark recognition than active navigation, but there was no effect of movement control. For participants more familiar with the environment (Experiment 2), there was no effect of navigation control, but drivers showed better landmark recognition than backseat drivers. These findings are discussed in relation to action memory research. Measures of route and survey knowledge demonstrated that good performance resulted from active navigation (Experiment 1-2). Moreover, with regard to these measures, driving compensated for passive navigation if the environment was familiar (Experiment 2). An additional experiment in a lab setting (Experiment 3) validated the manipulation of navigation control and the used tasks and demonstrated the importance of real environment exposure. As our findings suggest, driving may be more relevant for remembering landmarks, but actively controlling navigation (even as a backseat driver) is more relevant for remembering a route than maneuvering a vehicle.

[1]  Francesca Pazzaglia,et al.  Strategies of processing spatial information in survey and landmark-centred individuals. , 2001 .

[2]  P. E. Morris,et al.  Practical aspects of memory : current research and issues , 1988 .

[3]  Monika Knopf,et al.  Memory for action events: findings in neurological patients. , 2005, Scandinavian journal of psychology.

[4]  Carryl L. Baldwin,et al.  Facilitating route memory with auditory route guidance systems. , 2006 .

[5]  Kanghee Lee,et al.  Effects of Active Navigation on Object Recognition in Virtual Environments , 2007, Cyberpsychology Behav. Soc. Netw..

[6]  A. Siegel,et al.  The development of spatial representations of large-scale environments. , 1975, Advances in child development and behavior.

[7]  Chao Li,et al.  A comparison of spatial knowledge acquisition with maps and mobile maps , 2009, Comput. Environ. Urban Syst..

[8]  A. Baddeley Domains of recollection. , 1982 .

[9]  E. Erdfelder,et al.  Statistical power analyses using G*Power 3.1: Tests for correlation and regression analyses , 2009, Behavior research methods.

[10]  E. A. Attree,et al.  The specificity of memory enhancement during interaction with a virtual environment. , 1999, Memory.

[11]  Michel Denis,et al.  Analog properties of cognitive maps constructed from verbal descriptions , 1992 .

[12]  D. Appleyard Styles and Methods of Structuring a City , 1970 .

[13]  Steve Pettifer,et al.  Transfer of route learning from virtual to real environments. , 2003, Journal of experimental psychology. Applied.

[14]  J. Engelkamp Memory for actions , 1998 .

[15]  P. Wilson Active Exploration of a Virtual Environment Does Not Promote Orientation or Memory for Objects , 1999 .

[16]  William S. Maki,et al.  Item and order information in spatial memory. , 1984 .

[17]  Annabel J. Cohen,et al.  Working Mental Representations of the Environment , 1984 .

[18]  Gary L. Allen,et al.  Expression of Configurational Knowledge of Large-Scale Environments , 1984 .

[19]  Meianie C Steffens Memory for goal-directed sequences of actions: Is doing better than seeing? , 2007, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[20]  T. McNamara,et al.  Orientation and perspective dependence in route and survey learning. , 2004, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[21]  Giuliano Geminiani,et al.  Active and passive spatial learning in a complex virtual environment: The effect of effcient exploration , 2002 .

[22]  Amy L Shelton,et al.  Individual skill differences and large-scale environmental learning. , 2006, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[23]  Barbara Hayes-Roth,et al.  Differences in spatial knowledge acquired from maps and navigation , 1982, Cognitive Psychology.

[24]  Nigel Foreman,et al.  Active Versus Passive Processing of Spatial Information in a Computer-Simulated Environment , 1997 .

[25]  Melanie C Steffens,et al.  Limits on the role of retrieval cues in memory for actions: Enactment effects in the absence of object cues in the environment , 2007, Memory & cognition.

[26]  C. Lawton Gender differences in way-finding strategies: Relationship to spatial ability and spatial anxiety , 1994 .

[27]  Jacob Cohen Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences , 1969, The SAGE Encyclopedia of Research Design.

[28]  Rul Stülpnagel,et al.  Active route learning in virtual environments: disentangling movement control from intention, instruction specificity, and navigation control , 2013, Psychological research.

[29]  E. Coluccia,et al.  Gender differences in spatial orientation: A review , 2004 .

[30]  Patrick Péruch,et al.  Acquisition of Spatial Knowledge Through Visual Exploration of Simulated Environments , 1995 .

[31]  Jonathan Z. Bakdash,et al.  Comparing Decision-Making and Control for Learning a Virtual Environment: Backseat Drivers Learn Where They are Going , 2008 .

[32]  Axel Buchner,et al.  Quite ordinary retrieval cues may determine free recall of actions , 2003 .

[33]  Reza Kormi-Nouri,et al.  The nature of memory for action events: An episodic integration view , 1995 .

[34]  A. Berthoz,et al.  Active, passive and snapshot exploration in a virtual environment: influence on scene memory, reorientation and path memory. , 2001, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.

[35]  M. Denis,et al.  Spatial discourse and navigation: an analysis of route directions in the city of Venice , 1999 .

[36]  R. L. Cohen,et al.  On the generality of some memory laws , 1981 .

[37]  J. G. Snodgrass,et al.  Pragmatics of measuring recognition memory: applications to dementia and amnesia. , 1988, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[38]  M. McDaniel,et al.  Instability in memory phenomena: A common puzzle and a unifying explanation , 2008, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[39]  H. Taylor,et al.  Goal-specific influences on the representation of spatial perspective , 1999, Memory & cognition.

[40]  J Engelkamp,et al.  Item and order information in subject-performed tasks and experimenter-performed tasks. , 2000, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[41]  G. Rizzolatti,et al.  Neurophysiological mechanisms underlying the understanding and imitation of action , 2001, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[42]  Johannes Engelkamp,et al.  Image- and motor-processes in the retention of verbal materials. , 1980 .

[43]  R. Nori,et al.  Individual Differences in Visuo-Spatial Working Memory and Real-World Wayfinding , 2009 .

[44]  Bernard N'Kaoua,et al.  Use of virtual reality for spatial knowledge transfer: effects of passive/active exploration mode in simple and complex routes for three different recall tasks , 2008, VRST '08.

[45]  Andrew P. Duchon,et al.  Do Humans Integrate Routes Into a Cognitive Map? Map- Versus Landmark-Based Navigation of Novel Shortcuts , 2005 .

[46]  Markus Knauff,et al.  Up the down staircase : Wayfinding strategies in multi-level buildings , 2006 .

[47]  T. Helstrup,et al.  In search of a motor element in memory for enacted events , 2005 .

[48]  Maximilian Schwalm,et al.  Computer-assisted navigation and the acquisition of route and survey knowledge , 2006 .

[49]  Tina Iachini,et al.  The effects of familiarity and gender on spatial representation , 2009 .

[50]  J. A. Stevens,et al.  Interference effects demonstrate distinct roles for visual and motor imagery during the mental representation of human action , 2005, Cognition.

[51]  A. Postma,et al.  The influence of intentional and incidental learning on acquiring spatial knowledge during navigation , 2006, Psychological research.

[52]  R. De Beni,et al.  Strategies of processing spatial information in survey and landmark-centred individuals , 2001 .

[53]  M. Rossano,et al.  Goal Specificity and the Acquisition of Survey Knowledge , 1999 .

[54]  Hubert D. Zimmer,et al.  The Construction of Mental Maps Based on a Fragmentary View of Physical Maps. , 2004 .