A method for developing organisation-wide manual handling based physical employment standards in a military context.

The benefit of job-related employment standards in physically demanding occupations are well known. A number of methodological frameworks have been established to guide the development of physical employment standards for single job functions. In the case of an organisation comprised of multiple and diverse employment specialisations, such as the Australian Army, it is impractical to develop unique employment standards for each occupation. OBJECTIVES To present an approach to organisational level physical employment standards development that seeks to retain occupationally specific task characteristics by applying a movement cluster approach. DESIGN Structured methodological overview. METHODS An outline of the research process used in performing job tasks analysis are presented, including the identification, quantification and characterisation, and verification of physically demanding manual handling tasks. The methodology used to filter task information collected from this job analyses to group manual handling tasks with similar characteristics (termed clusters), across a range of employment specialisations is given. Finally, we provide examples of test development based on these key manual handling clusters to develop a limited suite of tests with high content, criterion and face validity that may be implementable across a large organisation. RESULTS Job task analysis was performed on 57 employment specialisations, identifying 458 tasks that were grouped into 10 movement based clusters. The rationalisation of criterion tasks through clustering informed the development of a limited suite of tests with high content, criterion and face validity that may be implementable across a large organisation. CONCLUSION This approach could be applied when developing physical employment standards across other multi-occupation organisations.

[1]  Greg L. Carstairs,et al.  On the Relationship Between Discrete and Repetitive Lifting Performance in Military Tasks , 2014, Journal of strength and conditioning research.

[2]  Mark A. Burgman,et al.  Classical meets modern in the IDEA protocol for structured expert judgement , 2018 .

[3]  Joanne N. Caldwell,et al.  Predicting Endurance Time in a Repetitive Lift and Carry Task Using Linear Mixed Models , 2016, PloS one.

[4]  Robert J. Savage,et al.  Maximal and sub-maximal functional lifting performance at different platform heights , 2015, Ergonomics.

[5]  Herb Groeller,et al.  Work-based physiological assessment of physically-demanding trades: a methodological overview. , 2003, Journal of physiological anthropology and applied human science.

[6]  J. Knapik,et al.  Lifting tasks are associated with injuries during the early portion of a deployment to Afghanistan. , 2012, Military medicine.

[7]  M. Tipton,et al.  Physiological employment standards I. Occupational fitness standards: objectively subjective? , 2012, European Journal of Applied Physiology.

[8]  Alex Burdorf,et al.  Model for the work-relatedness of low-back pain. , 2003, Scandinavian journal of work, environment & health.

[9]  G. Borg Borg's Perceived Exertion and Pain Scales , 1998 .

[10]  A Garg,et al.  Revised NIOSH equation for the design and evaluation of manual lifting tasks. , 1993, Ergonomics.

[11]  Ben Beck,et al.  Predicting stretcher carriage: Investigating variations in bilateral carry tests. , 2016, Applied ergonomics.

[12]  Kane J. Middleton,et al.  The sensitivity of a military-based occupational fitness test of muscular strength. , 2017, Applied ergonomics.

[13]  S H Snook,et al.  The design of manual handling tasks: revised tables of maximum acceptable weights and forces. , 1991, Ergonomics.

[14]  B. Aisbett,et al.  Subjective job task analyses for physically demanding occupations: What is best practice? , 2012, Ergonomics.

[15]  Kane J. Middleton,et al.  Modifiable Anthropometric Characteristics Are Associated With Unilateral and Bilateral Carry Performance , 2016, Journal of strength and conditioning research.

[16]  Kane J. Middleton,et al.  Jerry can carriage is an effective predictor of stretcher carry performance , 2016, Ergonomics.

[17]  J. Harvey,et al.  A framework for the design and development of physical employment tests and standards , 2010, Ergonomics.

[18]  S J Legg,et al.  Effects of psychophysical lifting training on maximal repetitive lifting capacity. , 1988, American Industrial Hygiene Association journal.

[19]  Kane J. Middleton,et al.  Lift performance and lumbar loading in standing and seated lifts , 2016, Ergonomics.

[20]  Kane J. Middleton,et al.  Understanding Anthropometric Characteristics Associated With Performance in Manual Lifting Tasks , 2017, Journal of strength and conditioning research.

[21]  D. Billing,et al.  Development of a valid simulation assessment for a military dismounted assault task. , 2013, Military medicine.

[23]  Sean Gallagher,et al.  Physical limitations and musculoskeletal complaints associated with work in unusual or restricted postures: a literature review. , 2005, Journal of safety research.

[24]  A study of the effects of isokinetic pre-employment physical capability screening in the reduction of musculoskeletal disorders in a labor intensive work environment. , 2006, Work.

[25]  Greg L. Carstairs,et al.  A Box Lift and Place Assessment is Related to Performance of Several Military Manual Handling Tasks. , 2016, Military medicine.

[26]  B. Zumbo Standard-setting methodology: Establishing performance standards and setting cut-scores to assist score interpretation. , 2016, Applied physiology, nutrition, and metabolism = Physiologie appliquee, nutrition et metabolisme.

[27]  Stuart M McGill,et al.  Low back loads while walking and carrying: comparing the load carried in one hand or in both hands , 2013, Ergonomics.