A Comparison of Data‐Driven Groundwater Vulnerability Assessment Methods

Increasing availability of geo‐environmental data has promoted the use of statistical methods to assess groundwater vulnerability. Nitrate is a widespread anthropogenic contaminant in groundwater and its occurrence can be used to identify aquifer settings vulnerable to contamination. In this study, multivariate Weights of Evidence (WofE) and Logistic Regression (LR) methods, where the response variable is binary, were used to evaluate the role and importance of a number of explanatory variables associated with nitrate sources and occurrence in groundwater in the Milan District (central part of the Po Plain, Italy). The results of these models have been used to map the spatial variation of groundwater vulnerability to nitrate in the region, and we compare the similarities and differences of their spatial patterns and associated explanatory variables. We modify the standard WofE method used in previous groundwater vulnerability studies to a form analogous to that used in LR; this provides a framework to compare the results of both models and reduces the effect of sampling bias on the results of the standard WofE model. In addition, a nonlinear Generalized Additive Model has been used to extend the LR analysis. Both approaches improved discrimination of the standard WofE and LR models, as measured by the c‐statistic. Groundwater vulnerability probability outputs, based on rank‐order classification of the respective model results, were similar in spatial patterns and identified similar strong explanatory variables associated with nitrate source (population density as a proxy for sewage systems and septic sources) and nitrate occurrence (groundwater depth).

[1]  F. Agterberg,et al.  Integration of Geological Datasets for Gold Exploration in Nova Scotia , 2013 .

[2]  G. Vižintin,et al.  Groundwater nitrate vulnerability assessment in alluvial aquifer using process-based models and weights-of-evidence method: Lower Savinja Valley case study (Slovenia) , 2011 .

[3]  A. Brenning,et al.  Integrating physical and empirical landslide susceptibility models using generalized additive models , 2011 .

[4]  M. Amini,et al.  Predicting groundwater arsenic contamination in Southeast Asia from surface parameters , 2008 .

[5]  Gary L. Raines,et al.  Development and Implementation of a Bayesian-based Aquifer Vulnerability Assessment in Florida , 2007 .

[6]  Simone Sterlacchini,et al.  The Use of the Weights-of-Evidence Modeling Technique to Estimate the Vulnerability of Groundwater to Nitrate Contamination , 2007 .

[7]  G. Raines,et al.  Assessment of Exploration Bias in Data-Driven Predictive Models and the Estimation of Undiscovered Resources , 2007 .

[8]  Sharon L. Qi,et al.  Latin Hypercube Approach to Estimate Uncertainty in Ground Water Vulnerability , 2007, Ground water.

[9]  Richard M Vogel,et al.  Predicting ground water nitrate concentration from land use , 2005, Ground water.

[10]  Jagath J Kaluarachchi,et al.  Aquifer vulnerability assessment to heavy metals using ordinal logistic regression , 2005, Ground water.

[11]  Fred Worrall,et al.  The vulnerability of groundwater to pesticide contamination estimated directly from observations of presence or absence in wells , 2005 .

[12]  Nicola Pirrone,et al.  Stochastic analysis to assess the spatial distribution of groundwater nitrate concentrations in the Po catchment (Italy). , 2005, Environmental pollution.

[13]  T N Narasimhan,et al.  Basic Tenets for Water Management , 2005, Ground water.

[14]  U. Ligges.  Review of An R and S-PLUS companion to applied regression by J. Fox, Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, California 2002 , 2003 .

[15]  B. Ruddy,et al.  Probability of nitrate contamination of recently recharged groundwaters in the conterminous United States. , 2002, Environmental science & technology.

[16]  B. Nolan,et al.  Relating Nitrogen Sources and Aquifer Susceptibility to Nitrate in Shallow Ground Waters of the United States , 2001, Ground water.

[17]  A. Dassargues,et al.  Current trends and future challenges in groundwater vulnerability assessment using overlay and index methods , 2000 .

[18]  G. Raines.  Evaluation of Weights of Evidence to Predict Epithermal-Gold Deposits in the Great Basin of the Western United States , 1999 .

[19]  D. Kolpin,et al.  Agrichemicals in Ground Water of the Midwestern USA: Relations to Soil Characteristics , 1999 .

[20]  F. Voss,et al.  Predicting the Probability of Elevated Nitrate Concentrations in the Puget Sound Basin: Implications for Aquifer Susceptibility and Vulnerability , 1997 .

[21]  P. Stackelberg,et al.  Relation of Ground-Water Quality to Land Use on Long Island, New York , 1995 .

[22]  D. Bosch.  Ground Water Vulnerability Assessment: Predicting Relative Contamination Potential under Conditions of Uncertainty , 1995 .

[23]  A. M. Duda,et al.  Addressing Nonpoint Sources of Water Pollution Must Become an International Priority , 1993 .

[24]  D. Hosmer,et al.  Applied Logistic Regression , 1991 .

[25]  D. Baker.  Groundwater quality assessment through cooperative private well testing: An Ohio example , 1990 .

[26]  Stefan Sperlich,et al.  Generalized Additive Models , 2014 .

[27]  Steven R. Lerman,et al.  The Estimation of Choice Probabilities from Choice Based Samples , 1977 .

[28]  R. K. Frevert,et al.  Soil and Water Conservation Engineering , 1955, Soil Science Society of America Journal.

[29]  Harold H. Sanguinetti.  HYDROLOGY , 1923 .

[30]  Simone Sterlacchini,et al.  Spatial and statistical assessment of factors influencing nitrate contamination in groundwater. , 2008, Journal of environmental management.

[31]  Dennis R. Helsel,et al.  Assessing ground-water vulnerability to contamination: Providing scientifically defensible information for decision makers , 2002 .

[32]  Simone Sterlacchini,et al.  Bayes’ rule and GIS for evaluating sensitivity of groundwater to contamination , 2001 .