The communicative function of English verb number

This paper offers an account of English verb number solely in terms of communicative function. In this account, verb number is a full-fledged expressive device comparable to the number system for English nouns; all instances of verb number are accounted for in terms of meaning, with the caveat that meaning pertains to conceptualization, not reference. Two points emerge from this line of analysis. First, verb number is not controlled by subject number; each is a separate communicative choice governed by discourse-based principles of semantic coherence. Second, even though the subject usually precedes the verb, speakers can nevertheless think ahead and choose subject number so as to accommodate an anticipated choice of verb number just as well as the reverse, and appear to do both on different occasions. Thus, both choices are best understood in terms of symmetrical relations of textual cohesion, usually with each other but sometimes with other features of the context.

[1]  Takashi Aoyama,et al.  The Free-Floating Focus System in Japanese::Form-Content Analysis of WA and GA , 1983 .

[2]  Alan Huffman The Categories of Grammar: French Lui and Le , 1997 .

[3]  A. Wierzbicka “oats” and “wheat”: the fallacy of arbitrariness , 1985 .

[4]  Michael Barlow,et al.  Agreement as a Discourse Phenomenon , 1999 .

[5]  Willard Van Orman Quine,et al.  From a Logical Point of View , 1955 .

[6]  Vincenza Minutella The grammar of English , 2009 .

[7]  Michael Darnell Functionalism and formalism in linguistics , 1999 .

[8]  S. Wechsler Mixed agreement, the person feature, and the index/concord distinction , 2011 .

[9]  Erica C. Garcia,et al.  The Motivated Syntax of Arbitrary Signs: Cognitive constraints on Spanish clitic clustering , 2009 .

[10]  Ellen Contini-Morava,et al.  Meaning as explanation : advances in linguistic sign theory , 1995 .

[11]  R. Kirsner The problem of presentative sentences in modern Dutch , 1982 .

[12]  A. Huffman The linguistics of William Diver and the Columbia school , 2001 .

[13]  Mark C. Smith,et al.  High level processing scope in spoken sentence production , 1999, Cognition.

[14]  David A. Zubin Discourse Function of Morphology: The Focus System in German , 1979 .

[15]  W. Diver The system of relevance of the homeric verb , 1969 .

[16]  The Free-Floating Focus System in Japanese: , 1983 .

[17]  Sidney Greenbaum,et al.  A Concise Grammar of Contemporary English , 1973 .

[18]  J. Haiman,et al.  Iconicity in Syntax , 1987 .

[19]  Ellen Contini-Morava Discourse Pragmatics and Semantic Categorization: The Case of Negation and Tense-Aspect with Special Reference to Swahili , 1989 .

[20]  David Crystal,et al.  A dictionary of linguistics and phonetics , 1997 .

[21]  Richard S. Kayne Movement and silence , 2005 .

[22]  Michael Halliday,et al.  Cohesion in English , 1976 .

[23]  Ernstpeter Maurer,et al.  Quine, Willard Van Orman , 2004 .

[24]  Ricardo Otheguy Saussurean Anti-Nomenclaturism in Grammatical Analysis: A Comparative Theoretical Perspective , 2002 .

[25]  Lynn Nadel,et al.  Encyclopedia of Cognitive Science , 2003 .

[26]  Heles Contreras,et al.  The role of theory in linguistic analysis : the Spanish pronoun system , 1976 .

[27]  Ivan A. Sag,et al.  Book Reviews: Head-driven Phrase Structure Grammar and German in Head-driven Phrase-structure Grammar , 1996, CL.

[28]  M. Black,et al.  Translations from the philosophical writings of Gottlob Frege , 1953 .

[29]  Alan Huffman Diver’s Theory , 2006 .

[30]  Eric S Solomon,et al.  Semantic integration and syntactic planning in language production , 2004, Cognitive Psychology.

[31]  Otto Jespersen,et al.  Essentials of English Grammar , 1933 .

[32]  G. Bailey,et al.  Variation in subject-verb concord in Early Modern English , 1989, Language Variation and Change.

[33]  Marcel den Dikken The syntax of features. , 2000 .

[34]  Davis,et al.  Advances in Functional Linguistics: Columbia School beyond its origins , 2006 .

[35]  Wallis Hoch Reid,et al.  Verb and Noun Number in English: A Functional Explanation , 1991 .

[36]  William Diver,et al.  Language: Communication and Human Behavior: The Linguistic Essays of William Diver , 2011 .