[Endogenous retroviruses: friend or foe of the immune system?]

Upon priming by dendritic cells, naïve CD4 T lymphocytes are exposed to distinct molecular environments depending on the nature of the pathological stimulus. In response, they mobilize different gene networks that establish lineage-specific developmental programs, and coordinate the acquisition of specific phenotype and functions. Accordingly, CD4 T cells are capable of differentiation into a large variety of functionally-distinct T helper (Th) cell subsets. In this review, we describe the molecular events that control CD4 T cell differentiation at the level of the chromatin. We insist on recent works that have highlighted the key role of H3K9me3-dependent epigenetic mechanisms in the regulation of T cell identity. Interestingly, these pathways shape and control the developmental programs at least in part through the regulation of endogenous retroviruses-derived sequences that have been exapted into cis-regulatory modules of Th genes.

[1]  V. Adoue,et al.  The Histone Methyltransferase SETDB1 Controls T Helper Cell Lineage Integrity by Repressing Endogenous Retroviruses , 2019, Immunity.

[2]  Sebastian Amigorena,et al.  The epigenetic control of stemness in CD8+ T cell fate commitment , 2018, Science.

[3]  C. Feschotte,et al.  Regulatory activities of transposable elements: from conflicts to benefits , 2016, Nature Reviews Genetics.

[4]  M. Hattori,et al.  A Histone Methyltransferase ESET Is Critical for T Cell Development , 2016, The Journal of Immunology.

[5]  Xiaoming Shi,et al.  The Costimulatory Receptor OX40 Inhibits Interleukin-17 Expression through Activation of Repressive Chromatin Remodeling Pathways. , 2016, Immunity.

[6]  M. Lorincz,et al.  Long Terminal Repeats: From Parasitic Elements to Building Blocks of the Transcriptional Regulatory Repertoire. , 2016, Molecular cell.

[7]  Helen M. Rowe,et al.  Transposable Elements and Their KRAB-ZFP Controllers Regulate Gene Expression in Adult Tissues. , 2016, Developmental cell.

[8]  C. Feschotte,et al.  Regulatory evolution of innate immunity through co-option of endogenous retroviruses , 2016, Science.

[9]  D. Trono,et al.  The developmental control of transposable elements and the evolution of higher species. , 2015, Annual review of cell and developmental biology.

[10]  J. Loureiro,et al.  KMT1E-mediated chromatin modifications at the FcγRIIb promoter regulate thymocyte development , 2015, Genes and Immunity.

[11]  T. Kuhlmann,et al.  Chromatin Landscape Defined by Repressive Histone Methylation during Oligodendrocyte Differentiation , 2015, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[12]  Zhihai Ma,et al.  Widespread contribution of transposable elements to the innovation of gene regulatory networks , 2014, Genome research.

[13]  J. Martens,et al.  Suv39h-dependent H3K9me3 marks intact retrotransposons and silences LINE elements in mouse embryonic stem cells. , 2014, Molecular cell.

[14]  Helen M. Rowe,et al.  TRIM28 repression of retrotransposon-based enhancers is necessary to preserve transcriptional dynamics in embryonic stem cells , 2013, Genome research.

[15]  Stephen H. Hughes,et al.  H3K4me3 Interactions with TAF3 Regulate Preinitiation Complex Assembly and Selective Gene Activation , 2013, Cell.

[16]  S. Amigorena,et al.  Contrôle épigénétique de la stabilité phénotypique et fonctionnelle des lymphocytes Th2 par la voie Suv39h1/HP1α , 2012 .

[17]  Shao-Cong Sun,et al.  TRIM28 mediates chromatin modifications at the TCRα enhancer and regulates the development of T and natural killer T cells , 2012, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[18]  James H. Thomas,et al.  KAP1 regulates gene networks controlling T‐cell development and responsiveness , 2012, FASEB journal : official publication of the Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology.

[19]  H. A. Schreiber,et al.  An epigenetic silencing pathway controlling T helper 2 cell lineage commitment , 2012, Nature.

[20]  T. Honjo,et al.  TRIM28 prevents autoinflammatory T cell development in vivo , 2012, Nature Immunology.

[21]  J. O’Shea,et al.  Transcriptional and epigenetic control of T helper cell specification: molecular mechanisms underlying commitment and plasticity. , 2012, Annual review of immunology.

[22]  C. Sautès-Fridman,et al.  The immune contexture in human tumours: impact on clinical outcome , 2012, Nature Reviews Cancer.

[23]  Steven J. M. Jones,et al.  Retrotransposon-Induced Heterochromatin Spreading in the Mouse Revealed by Insertional Polymorphisms , 2011, PLoS genetics.

[24]  Steven J. M. Jones,et al.  DNA methylation and SETDB1/H3K9me3 regulate predominantly distinct sets of genes, retroelements, and chimeric transcripts in mESCs. , 2011, Cell stem cell.

[25]  Riitta Lahesmaa,et al.  Genomic views of STAT function in CD4+ T helper cell differentiation , 2011, Nature Reviews Immunology.

[26]  C. Muchardt,et al.  Histone H3 lysine 9 trimethylation and HP1γ favor inclusion of alternative exons , 2011, Nature Structural &Molecular Biology.

[27]  K. Shuai,et al.  The Ligase PIAS1 Restricts Natural Regulatory T Cell Differentiation by Epigenetic Repression , 2010, Science.

[28]  W. Paul,et al.  Mechanisms Underlying Lineage Commitment and Plasticity of Helper CD4+ T Cells , 2010, Science.

[29]  R. Young,et al.  SetDB1 contributes to repression of genes encoding developmental regulators and maintenance of ES cell state. , 2009, Genes & development.

[30]  G. Almouzni,et al.  The HP1α–CAF1–SetDB1‐containing complex provides H3K9me1 for Suv39‐mediated K9me3 in pericentric heterochromatin , 2009, EMBO reports.

[31]  Christopher B Wilson,et al.  Epigenetic control of T-helper-cell differentiation , 2009, Nature Reviews Immunology.

[32]  A. Bertin,et al.  Structure et dynamique de la particule cœur de nucléosome , 2008 .

[33]  A. Bird,et al.  Genomic DNA methylation: the mark and its mediators. , 2006, Trends in biochemical sciences.

[34]  G. Blobel,et al.  Histone H3 lysine 9 methylation and HP1gamma are associated with transcription elongation through mammalian chromatin. , 2005, Molecular cell.

[35]  A. Evsikov,et al.  Retrotransposons regulate host genes in mouse oocytes and preimplantation embryos. , 2004, Developmental cell.

[36]  D. Littman,et al.  Evidence for distinct CD4 silencer functions at different stages of thymocyte differentiation. , 2002, Molecular cell.

[37]  R. Schreiber,et al.  Cancer immunoediting: from immunosurveillance to tumor escape , 2002, Nature Immunology.

[38]  G. Maul,et al.  SETDB1: a novel KAP-1-associated histone H3, lysine 9-specific methyltransferase that contributes to HP1-mediated silencing of euchromatic genes by KRAB zinc-finger proteins. , 2002, Genes & development.

[39]  Karl Mechtler,et al.  Loss of the Suv39h Histone Methyltransferases Impairs Mammalian Heterochromatin and Genome Stability , 2001, Cell.

[40]  J. Sedat,et al.  Early transcription and silencing of cytokine genes underlie polarization of T helper cell subsets. , 2001, Immunity.

[41]  Karl Mechtler,et al.  Methylation of histone H3 lysine 9 creates a binding site for HP1 proteins , 2001, Nature.

[42]  M. Jenkins,et al.  Inflammatory cytokines provide a third signal for activation of naive CD4+ and CD8+ T cells. , 1999, Journal of immunology.

[43]  Chyung-Ru Wang,et al.  Helper T cell differentiation is controlled by the cell cycle. , 1998, Immunity.

[44]  J. Allison,et al.  CD28-mediated signalling co-stimulates murine T cells and prevents induction of anergy in T-cell clones , 1992, Nature.

[45]  Julien Pontis,et al.  Sound of silence: the properties and functions of repressive Lys methyltransferases , 2015, Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology.

[46]  G. Almouzni,et al.  [Epigenetic control of Th2 helper cell differentiation by the Suv39h1/HP1α pathway]. , 2012, Medecine sciences : M/S.

[47]  S. Mangenot,et al.  [Structure and dynamic of the nucleosome core particle]. , 2008, Medecine sciences : M/S.