Factors affecting users' online privacy literacy among students in Israel

Purpose The purpose of this paper is to investigate the attitudes and influential factors of users’ knowledge and use of the tools designated for controlling and enhancing online privacy, which are referred to as online privacy literacy (OPL). Particularly, inspired by the protection motivation theory, a motivational factor is defined as comprising several variables which reflect users’ motivation to protect their online privacy. Design/methodology/approach To this end, a user study was conducted based on the quantitative method with the participation of 169 students from the Israeli academia who were administered closed-ended questionnaires. Findings Generally low to moderate levels of OPL were obtained. Interestingly, the multivariate linear regression analysis showed that motivational factors, such as users’ concern for personal information protection on the internet and users’ privacy self-efficacy and sense of anonymity when visiting a website, were among the strongest predictive factors of users’ OPL level. Social implications This research has social implications that might contribute to an increase in the OPL among internet users. Originality/value The direct influence of the examined factors on users’ OPL was not previously discussed in the literature. As a result of the study, a comprehensive model of user online privacy behavior was constructed.

[1]  Norman A. Johnson,et al.  Personality traits and concern for privacy: an empirical study in the context of location-based services , 2008, Eur. J. Inf. Syst..

[2]  Mike Z. Yao,et al.  Predicting Self-Protections of Online Privacy , 2008, Cyberpsychology Behav. Soc. Netw..

[3]  R. W. Rogers,et al.  A Protection Motivation Theory of Fear Appeals and Attitude Change1. , 1975, The Journal of psychology.

[4]  J. Alberto Castañeda,et al.  The dimensionality of customer privacy concern on the internet , 2007, Online Inf. Rev..

[5]  Zeynep Tufekci.  Can You See Me Now? Audience and Disclosure Regulation in Online Social Network Sites , 2008 .

[6]  Bernhard Debatin,et al.  Facebook and Online Privacy: Attitudes, Behaviors, and Unintended Consequences , 2009, J. Comput. Mediat. Commun..

[7]  R. Rogers.  Cognitive and physiological processes in fear appeals and attitude change: a revised theory of prote , 1983 .

[8]  Nili Steinfeld,et al.  Trading with privacy: the price of personal information , 2015, Online Inf. Rev..

[9]  Craig E. Wills,et al.  A Personalized Approach to Web Privacy - Awareness, Attitudes and Actions , 2011, Inf. Manag. Comput. Secur..

[10]  Dara V. O'Neil.  Analysis of Internet Users’ Level of Online Privacy Concerns , 2001 .

[11]  Maayan Zhitomirsky-Geffet,et al.  Professional information disclosure on social networks: The case of Facebook and LinkedIn in Israel , 2016, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[12]  Donna L. Hoffman,et al.  Information Privacy in the Marketspace: Implications for the Commercial Uses of Anonymity on the Web , 1999, Inf. Soc..

[13]  George R. Milne,et al.  Trust and Concern in Consumers’ Perceptions of Marketing Information Management Practices , 1999 .

[14]  Philipp K. Masur,et al.  Do People Know About Privacy and Data Protection Strategies? Towards the “Online Privacy Literacy Scale” (OPLIS) , 2015 .

[15]  Heng Xu,et al.  Information Privacy Research: An Interdisciplinary Review , 2011, MIS Q..

[16]  Yong Jin Park,et al.  Digital Literacy and Privacy Behavior Online , 2013, Commun. Res..

[17]  Hsuan-Ting Chen,et al.  Couldn't or Wouldn't? The Influence of Privacy Concerns and Self-Efficacy in Privacy Management on Privacy Protection , 2015, Cyberpsychology Behav. Soc. Netw..

[18]  Stefan Stieger,et al.  Internet users' perceptions of 'privacy concerns' and 'privacy actions' , 2007, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..

[19]  Jochen Wirtz,et al.  Consumer online privacy concerns and responses: a power–responsibility equilibrium perspective , 2007 .

[20]  Andrew J. Rohm,et al.  Consumers' Protection of Online Privacy and Identity , 2004 .

[21]  Miriam J. Metzger.  Privacy, Trust, and Disclosure: Exploring Barriers to Electronic Commerce , 2006, J. Comput. Mediat. Commun..

[22]  Seounmi Youn.  Determinants of Online Privacy Concern and Its Influence on Privacy Protection Behaviors Among Young Adolescents , 2009 .

[23]  Joseph Turow,et al.  Americans Online Privacy: The System Is Broken , 2003 .

[24]  M. Culnan,et al.  Information Privacy Concerns, Procedural Fairness, and Impersonal Trust: An Empirical Investigation , 1999 .

[25]  Jenny Bronstein,et al.  Creating possible selves: information disclosure behaviour on social networks , 2014, Inf. Res..

[26]  Colin Potts,et al.  Privacy practices of Internet users: Self-reports versus observed behavior , 2005, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..

[27]  Susan B. Barnes,et al.  A privacy paradox: Social networking in the United States , 2006, First Monday.

[28]  Moshe Greenberg,et al.  Introduction to Hebrew , 1971 .

[29]  Jochen Wirtz,et al.  Regulatory Focus Theory, Trust, and Privacy Concern , 2009 .

[30]  T. Graeff,et al.  Collecting and using personal data: consumers’ awareness and concerns , 2002 .

[31]  Jochen Wirtz,et al.  Causes and consequences of consumer online privacy concern , 2007 .

[32]  Alessandro Acquisti,et al.  Information revelation and privacy in online social networks , 2005, WPES '05.

[33]  J. Turow,et al.  Open to Exploitation: America's Shoppers Online and Offline , 2005 .

[34]  Kim Sheehan,et al.  Toward a Typology of Internet Users and Online Privacy Concerns , 2002, Inf. Soc..

[35]  Tamara Dinev,et al.  Internet Privacy Concerns and Social Awareness as Determinants of Intention to Transact , 2005, Int. J. Electron. Commer..

[36]  Mike Z. Yao,et al.  Predicting user concerns about online privacy , 2007 .

[37]  Chiung-Wen Hsu,et al.  Privacy concerns, privacy practices and web site categories: Toward a situational paradigm , 2006, Online Inf. Rev..

[38]  Alessandro Acquisti,et al.  Imagined Communities: Awareness, Information Sharing, and Privacy on the Facebook , 2006, Privacy Enhancing Technologies.