An international prospective cohort study of mobile phone users and health (Cosmos): design considerations and enrolment.

BACKGROUND There is continuing public and scientific interest in the possibility that exposure to radiofrequency (RF) electromagnetic fields (EMF) from mobile telephones or other wireless devices and applications might increase the risk of certain cancers or other diseases. The interest is amplified by the rapid world-wide penetration of such technologies. The evidence from epidemiological studies published to date have not been consistent and, in particular, further studies are required to identify whether longer term (well beyond 10 years) RF exposure might pose some health risk. METHODS The "Cosmos" study described here is a large prospective cohort study of mobile telephone users (ongoing recruitment of 250,000 men and women aged 18+ years in five European countries - Denmark, Finland, Sweden, The Netherlands, UK) who will be followed up for 25+ years. Information on mobile telephone use is collected prospectively through questionnaires and objective traffic data from network operators. Associations with disease risks will be studied by linking cohort members to existing disease registries, while changes in symptoms such as headache and sleep quality and of general well-being are assessed by baseline and follow-up questionnaires. CONCLUSIONS A prospective cohort study conducted with appropriate diligence and a sufficient sample size, overcomes many of the shortcomings of previous studies. Its major advantages are exposure assessment prior to the diagnosis of disease, the prospective collection of objective exposure information, long-term follow-up of multiple health outcomes, and the flexibility to investigate future changes in technologies or new research questions.

[1]  R. Hays,et al.  Psychometric properties of the Medical Outcomes Study Sleep measure. , 2005, Sleep medicine.

[2]  R. Lipton,et al.  A self-administered screener for migraine in primary care , 2003, Neurology.

[3]  J. Ware,et al.  Cross-validation of item selection and scoring for the SF-12 Health Survey in nine countries: results from the IQOLA Project. International Quality of Life Assessment. , 1998, Journal of clinical epidemiology.

[4]  D J Briggs,et al.  Mobile phone base stations and early childhood cancers: case-control study , 2010, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[5]  Joe Wiart,et al.  Feasibility of future epidemiological studies on possible health effects of mobile phone base stations , 2006, Bioelectromagnetics.

[6]  Leeka Kheifets,et al.  Epidemiologic Evidence on Mobile Phones and Tumor Risk: A Review , 2009, Epidemiology.

[7]  A. Dowson,et al.  A six-item short-form survey for measuring headache impact: The HIT-6™ , 2003, Quality of Life Research.

[8]  Naohito Yamaguchi,et al.  The INTERPHONE study: design, epidemiological methods, and description of the study population , 2007, European Journal of Epidemiology.

[9]  Kari Tokola,et al.  Epidemiological risk assessment of mobile phones and cancer: where can we improve? , 2006, European journal of cancer prevention : the official journal of the European Cancer Prevention Organisation.

[10]  E Cardis,et al.  Distribution of RF energy emitted by mobile phones in anatomical structures of the brain , 2008, Physics in medicine and biology.

[11]  J. Ware,et al.  A 12-Item Short-Form Health Survey: construction of scales and preliminary tests of reliability and validity. , 1996, Medical care.

[12]  An evaluation of exposure metrics in an epidemiologic study on radio and television broadcast transmitters and the risk of childhood leukemia , 2009, Bioelectromagnetics.

[13]  M. Vrijheid,et al.  Quantifying the impact of selection bias caused by nonparticipation in a case-control study of mobile phone use. , 2009, Annals of epidemiology.

[14]  Maria Blettner,et al.  Cellular phones, cordless phones, and the risks of glioma and meningioma (Interphone Study Group, Germany). , 2006, American journal of epidemiology.

[15]  Joachim Schüz,et al.  Lost in laterality: interpreting ‘‘preferred side of the head during mobile phone use and risk of brain tumour’’ associations , 2009, Scandinavian journal of public health.

[16]  Susanna Lagorio,et al.  Recall bias in the assessment of exposure to mobile phones , 2008, Journal of Exposure Science and Environmental Epidemiology.

[17]  Paul Elliott,et al.  Call-related factors influencing output power from mobile phones , 2006, Journal of Exposure Science and Environmental Epidemiology.

[18]  Anssi Auvinen,et al.  Mobile phone use and risk of glioma in 5 North European countries , 2007, International journal of cancer.

[19]  C. Bornkessel,et al.  Determination of the general public exposure around GSM and UMTS base stations. , 2007, Radiation protection dosimetry.

[20]  A. Ahlbom Guidelines for limiting exposure to time-varying electric, magnetic, and electromagnetic fields (up to 300 GHz) , 1998 .

[21]  Susanna Lagorio,et al.  Electromagnetic fields and epidemiology: An overview inspired by the fourth course at the International School of Bioelectromagnetics , 2009, Bioelectromagnetics.

[22]  Leeka Kheifets,et al.  Epidemiology of Health Effects of Radiofrequency Exposure , 2004, Environmental health perspectives.

[23]  Elisabeth Cardis,et al.  Brain tumour risk in relation to mobile telephone use: results of the INTERPHONE international case-control study. , 2010, International journal of epidemiology.

[24]  Andreas Siegenthaler,et al.  Exposure modeling of high-frequency electromagnetic fields , 2008, Journal of Exposure Science and Environmental Epidemiology.

[25]  E Cardis,et al.  Validation of short term recall of mobile phone use for the Interphone study , 2006, Occupational and Environmental Medicine.