Human-machine cooperation principles to support driving automation systems design

Car manufacturers and automotive suppliers design more and more Advanced Driving Assistance Systems (ADAS) that are quickly installed into cars. Nevertheless, such ADAS address different types of driving activities and driver's behaviors; they might concern longitudinal and lateral controls, lane changes, navigation, and try to take into account driver state and behavior. But what about the complementarity of such different ADAS if they are all together implemented in one car? And what about their interactions with the driver? Interactions have to be defined according to the levels of automation selected by the car manufacturer. In the French national project CoCoVeA (French acronym for Cooperation between Driver and Automated Vehicle), three levels of automation have been studied involving several existing ADAS. And this paper proposes a methodological approach to identify competences and capacities of driver and ADAS in the case of many driving situations in order to check complementarity, function allocation, authority management, as well as cooperative aspects in order to assess reliability of such a Human-machine system and the acceptance and even the attractiveness of highly automated vehicle.

[1]  Kjeld Schmidt,et al.  Cooperative work: A conceptual framework , 1991 .

[2]  Jean-Michel Hoc,et al.  Cognitive Evaluation of Human-Human and Human-Machine Cooperation Modes in Air Traffic Control , 1998 .

[3]  Patrick Millot,et al.  An attempt for generic concepts toward human-machine cooperation , 1998, SMC'98 Conference Proceedings. 1998 IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics (Cat. No.98CH36218).

[4]  Christopher D. Wickens,et al.  A model for types and levels of human interaction with automation , 2000, IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern. Part A.

[5]  Serge Debernard,et al.  COOPERATING WITH AN ASSISTANCE TOOL FOR SAFE DRIVING , 2005 .

[6]  Jean-Michel Hoc,et al.  Diagnosis: some theoretical questions raised by applied research , 1995 .

[7]  Frédéric Vanderhaegen,et al.  Towards Levels of Cooperation , 2013, 2013 IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics.

[8]  Makoto Itoh,et al.  Towards Vertical and Horizontal Extension of Shared Control Concept , 2015, 2015 IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics.

[9]  Marie‐Pierre Pacaux‐Lemoine Human–Machine Cooperation Principles to Support Life‐Critical Systems Management , 2014 .

[10]  Marie-Pierre Pacaux-Lemoine,et al.  A Common Work Space to Support the Cooperation in the Cockpit ofa Two-Seater Fighter Aircraft , 2002, COOP.

[11]  Thomas B. Sheridan,et al.  Telerobotics, Automation, and Human Supervisory Control , 2003 .

[12]  David B. Kaber,et al.  The effects of level of automation and adaptive automation on human performance, situation awareness and workload in a dynamic control task , 2004 .