Life cycle sustainability assessment in the context of sustainability science progress (part 2)

PurposeIn the context of progress of sustainability science, life cycle thinking and, in particular, life cycle sustainability assessment may play a crucial role. Environmental, economic and social implications of the whole supply chain of products, both goods and services, their use and waste management, i.e. their entire life cycle from “cradle to grave” have to be considered to achieve more sustainable production and consumption patterns. Progress toward sustainability requires enhancing the methodologies for integrated assessment and mainstreaming of life cycle thinking from product development to strategic policy support. Life cycle assessment (LCA), life cycle costing (LCC) and social LCA (sLCA) already attempt to cover sustainability pillars, notwithstanding different levels of methodological development. An increasing concern on how to deal with the complexity of sustainability has promoted the development of life cycle sustainability frameworks. As a contribution to the ongoing scientific debate after the Rio+20 conference, this paper aims to present and discuss the state of the art of life cycle sustainability assessment (LCSA), giving recommendations for its further development in line with ontological, epistemological and methodological aspects of sustainability science.MethodsBuilding on the review about the state of the art of sustainability science and sustainability assessment methods presented in part I, this paper discuss LCA, LCC, sLCA and LCSA against ontological, epistemological and methodological aspects of ongoing scientific debate on sustainability. Strengths and weaknesses of existing life cycle-based methodologies and methods are presented. Besides, existing frameworks for LCSA are evaluated against the criteria defined in part I in order to highlight coherence with sustainability science progress and to support better integration and mainstreaming of sustainability concepts.Conclusions and outlookLCSA represents a promising approach for developing a transparent, robust and comprehensive assessment. Nevertheless, the ongoing developments should be in line with the most advanced scientific discussion on sustainability science, attempting to bridge the gaps between the current methods and methodologies for sustainability assessment. LCSA should develop so as to be hierarchically different from LCA, LCC and sLCA. It should represent the holistic approach which integrates (and not substitutes) the reductionist approach of the single part of the analysis. This implies maintaining the balance between analytical and descriptive approaches towards a goal and solution-oriented decision support methodology.

[1]  Robert Ries,et al.  Environmental decision making in multi-stakeholder contexts: applicability of life cycle thinking in development planning and implementation , 2009 .

[2]  Bronwyn L Horsey,et al.  Developing and applying a framework to evaluate participatory research for sustainability , 2007 .

[3]  M. Margni,et al.  Considering time in LCA: dynamic LCA and its application to global warming impact assessments. , 2010, Environmental science & technology.

[4]  F. Chapin,et al.  Planetary boundaries: Exploring the safe operating space for humanity , 2009 .

[5]  Ettore Settanni,et al.  The need for a computational structure of LCC , 2008 .

[6]  M. Huijbregts,et al.  Toward meaningful end points of biodiversity in life cycle assessment. , 2011, Environmental science & technology.

[7]  Andrea Raggi,et al.  Finding Life Cycle Assessment Research Direction with the Aid of Meta‐Analysis , 2012 .

[8]  Marzia Traverso,et al.  Towards a life cycle sustainability assessment: making informed choices on products , 2011 .

[9]  Alessandra Zamagni,et al.  Life cycle sustainability assessment , 2012, The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment.

[10]  Katsuyuki Nakano,et al.  Collaborative activity with business partners for improvement of product environmental performance using LCA , 2011 .

[11]  Haley Jones,et al.  A system dynamics approach in LCA to account for temporal effects—a consequential energy LCI of car body-in-whites , 2012, The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment.

[12]  Matthias Finkbeiner,et al.  Defining the baseline in social life cycle assessment , 2010 .

[13]  Martin Kumar Patel,et al.  Applying distance-to-target weighing methodology to evaluate the environmental performance of bio-based energy, fuels, and materials , 2007 .

[14]  Alessandra Zamagni,et al.  Progress in sustainability science: lessons learnt from current methodologies for sustainability assessment: Part 1 , 2013, The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment.

[15]  L. Osorio,et al.  An epistemology for sustainability science: a proposal for the study of the health/disease phenomenon , 2009 .

[16]  Almudena Hospido,et al.  Development of regional characterization factors for aquatic eutrophication , 2009 .

[17]  Elsa Henriques,et al.  A Life Cycle Engineering model for technology selection: a case study on plastic injection moulds for low production volumes , 2009 .

[18]  Ernst Strüngmann Forum,et al.  Linkages of sustainability , 2009 .

[19]  Jean-Paul Hettelingh,et al.  Country-dependent Characterisation Factors for Acidification and Terrestrial Eutrophication Based on Accumulated Exceedance as an Impact Category Indicator (14 pp) , 2006 .

[20]  M. Huijbregts,et al.  European characterization factors for human health damage of PM10 and ozone in life cycle impact assessment , 2008 .

[21]  Gjalt Huppes,et al.  Life cycle assessment and sustainability analysis of products, materials and technologies. Toward a scientific framework for sustainability life cycle analysis , 2010 .

[22]  Erwin M. Schau,et al.  Towards Life Cycle Sustainability Assessment , 2010 .

[23]  Rainer Friedrich,et al.  The “ExternE” Methodology for Assessing the Eco‐efficiency of Technologies , 2011 .

[24]  Walter Kloepffer,et al.  Life cycle sustainability assessment of products , 2008 .

[25]  B. Weidema Market information in life cycle assessment , 2003 .

[26]  David Hunkeler,et al.  The Future of Life Cycle Assessment , 2005 .

[27]  David Pennington,et al.  Recent developments in Life Cycle Assessment. , 2009, Journal of environmental management.

[28]  Jane C. Bare,et al.  Life cycle impact assessment research developments and needs , 2010 .

[29]  John J. Reap,et al.  A survey of unresolved problems in life cycle assessment , 2008 .

[30]  Serenella Sala,et al.  Assessing resource depletion in LCA: a review of methods and methodological issues , 2014, The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment.

[31]  Anthony Halog,et al.  Application of agent-based modeling (ABM) of an integrated system modeling framework for designing a sustainable industrial park , 2012 .

[32]  Andreas Ciroth,et al.  A comparison of cut roses from Ecuador and the Netherlands , 2011 .

[33]  R. Heijungs,et al.  GLOBOX: A spatially differentiated global fate, intake and effect model for toxicity assessment in LCA. , 2010, The Science of the total environment.

[34]  Berit Mattsson,et al.  The feasibility of including sustainability in LCA for product development , 1998 .

[35]  Reinout Heijungs,et al.  Life Cycle Sustainability Analysis , 2012 .

[36]  Arnim Wiek,et al.  User engagement in sustainability research , 2011 .

[37]  David Hunkeler,et al.  Environmental life-cycle costing: a code of practice , 2011 .

[38]  Rainer Zah,et al.  Global environmental consequences of increased biodiesel consumption in Switzerland: consequential life cycle assessment , 2009 .

[39]  Huppes Gjalt,et al.  Evaluation of weighting methods for measuring the EU-27 overall environmental impact , 2011 .

[40]  Paul Upham,et al.  An Assessment of the Natural Step Theory of Sustainability , 2000 .

[41]  Scott Duncan,et al.  A survey of unresolved problems in life cycle assessment , 2008 .

[42]  Rana Pant,et al.  Research Needs and Challenges from Science to Decision Support. Lesson Learnt from the Development of the International Reference Life Cycle Data System (ILCD) Recommendations for Life Cycle Impact Assessment , 2012 .

[43]  Adisa Azapagic,et al.  Options for broadening and deepening the LCA approaches , 2010 .

[44]  Göran Broman,et al.  Sustainability Constraints as System Boundaries: An Approach to Making Life‐Cycle Management Strategic , 2006 .

[45]  Göran Finnveden,et al.  Scenarios in selected tools for environmental systems analysis , 2008 .

[46]  Annekatrin Lehmann,et al.  Life Cycle Costing in Sustainability Assessment—A Case Study of Remanufactured Alternators , 2011 .

[47]  M. El-Haram,et al.  A critical review of reductionist approaches for assessing the progress towards sustainability , 2008 .

[48]  Gjalt Huppes,et al.  Life cycle assessment: past, present, and future. , 2011, Environmental science & technology.

[49]  S. Funtowicz,et al.  Science for the Post-Normal Age , 1993, Commonplace.

[50]  Felix Creutzig,et al.  Reconciling top-down and bottom-up modelling on future bioenergy deployment , 2012 .

[51]  Reinout Heijungs,et al.  Identifying best existing practice for characterization modeling in life cycle impact assessment , 2012, The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment.