Study of the frustration in a 2D square lattice: a Monte Carlo study

In this paper, we study the magnetic properties of a square lattice system in 2D, using Monte Carlo simulations. Firstly, we elaborate the ground state phase diagrams, the only three stable configurations are: ferromagnetic (FM), anti-ferromagnetic (AF) and super anti-ferromagnetic (SAF). We predicted also the frustrated phases when (J2/J1 = −0.5 and J2/J1 = +0.5), this ratio coupling depending on the interaction coupling between the 1st and 2nd nearest neighbors. For low temperature values, the total and partial magnetizations are found to be in good agreement with those found in the ground state phase diagrams. To complete this study, we present and discuss the frustrated phases in the both cases: the ferromagnetic and anti-ferromagnetic states.

[1]  G. Guo,et al.  Reply to “Comment on ‘Gapless spin liquid ground state of the spin- 12J1−J2 Heisenberg model on square lattices' ” , 2018, Physical Review B.

[2]  S. Inoue,et al.  Semiconductive Single Molecular Bilayers Realized Using Geometrical Frustration , 2018, Advanced materials.

[3]  R. Niewa,et al.  Coexistence of ferromagnetism and unconventional spin-glass freezing in the site-disordered kagome ferrite SrSn2Fe4O11 , 2018 .

[4]  M. Weigand,et al.  Tunable geometrical frustration in magnonic vortex crystals , 2018, Scientific Reports.

[5]  Elizabeth L. Magnotti,et al.  Geometrical frustration as a potential design principle for peptide-based assemblies , 2017, Interface Focus.

[6]  S. van Dijken,et al.  Nanoscale control of competing interactions and geometrical frustration in a dipolar trident lattice , 2017, Nature Communications.

[7]  P. Farkašovský.  Effects of geometrical frustration on ferromagnetism in the Hubbard model on the generalised Shastry-Sutherland lattice , 2017, 1709.09461.

[8]  B. Koteswararao,et al.  Geometrical frustration in a new S = ½ distorted check-board lattice PbCuTeO5 , 2017 .

[9]  A. Sandvik,et al.  Critical Level Crossings and Gapless Spin Liquid in the Square-Lattice Spin-1/2 J_{1}-J_{2} Heisenberg Antiferromagnet. , 2017, Physical review letters.

[10]  M. Takigawa,et al.  J1−J2 square-lattice Heisenberg antiferromagnets with 4d1 spins: AMoOPO4Cl (A=K,Rb) , 2017, 1702.02660.

[11]  Shantao Zhang,et al.  Spin-Glass-Like Behavior and Topological Hall Effect in SrRuO3/SrIrO3 Superlattices for Oxide Spintronics Applications. , 2017, ACS applied materials & interfaces.

[12]  J. Cumings,et al.  Topological frustration of artificial spin ice , 2015, Nature Communications.

[13]  L. Balents.  Spin liquids in frustrated magnets , 2010, Nature.

[14]  A. Abakumov,et al.  Frustrated square lattice with spatial anisotropy: Crystal structure and magnetic properties of PbZnVO(PO4)2 , 2009, 0910.2258.

[15]  A. Tsirlin,et al.  Extension of the spin- (1)/(2) frustrated square lattice model: The case of layered vanadium phosphates , 2009, 0901.4498.

[16]  J. Richter,et al.  Ground state phases of the spin-1/2 J 1 -J 2 Heisenberg antiferromagnet on the square lattice: A high-order coupled cluster treatment , 2008, 0806.3825.

[17]  E. Antipov,et al.  Frustrated spin-1/2 square lattice in the layered perovskite PbVO3 , 2008, 0801.1434.

[18]  V. T. Ngo,et al.  Stacked Triangular XY Antiferromagnets: End of a Controversial Issue on the Phase Transition , 2007, 0711.0296.

[19]  T. Mason,et al.  Magnetic correlations in deuteronium jarosite, a model S = 5/2 Kagomé antiferromagnet , 1996, cond-mat/9607106.

[20]  Giacomini,et al.  Exact solution of an anisotropic centered honeycomb Ising lattice: Reentrance and partial disorder. , 1991, Physical review. B, Condensed matter.

[21]  R. Moessner,et al.  Geometrical Frustration , 2006 .