On the relation between dependency distance, crossing dependencies, and parsing. Comment on "Dependency distance: a new perspective on syntactic patterns in natural languages" by Haitao Liu et al
暂无分享,去创建一个
[1] Joakim Nivre,et al. Algorithms for Deterministic Incremental Dependency Parsing , 2008, CL.
[2] Carlos Gómez-Rodríguez. Restricted Non-Projectivity: Coverage vs. Efficiency , 2016, Computational Linguistics.
[3] Ramon Ferrer i Cancho,et al. Euclidean distance between syntactically linked words. , 2004, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.
[4] R. F. Cancho. Euclidean distance between syntactically linked words. , 2004 .
[5] Haitao Liu,et al. Dependency Distance as a Metric of Language Comprehension Difficulty , 2008 .
[6] Joakim Nivre,et al. Divisible Transition Systems and Multiplanar Dependency Parsing , 2013, CL.
[7] Joakim Nivre,et al. Non-Projective Dependency Parsing in Expected Linear Time , 2009, ACL.
[8] Michael A. Covington,et al. A Fundamental Algorithm for Dependency Parsing , 2004 .
[9] Danqi Chen,et al. A Fast and Accurate Dependency Parser using Neural Networks , 2014, EMNLP.
[10] Edward Gibson,et al. The processing of extraposed structures in English , 2012, Cognition.
[11] Jirí Havelka. Beyond Projectivity: Multilingual Evaluation of Constraints and Measures on Non-Projective Structures , 2007, ACL.
[12] Yannick Versley,et al. Experiments with Easy-first nonprojective constituent parsing , 2014 .
[13] Eliyahu Kiperwasser,et al. Simple and Accurate Dependency Parsing Using Bidirectional LSTM Feature Representations , 2016, TACL.
[14] Ramon Ferrer-i-Cancho,et al. Are crossing dependencies really scarce? , 2017, ArXiv.
[15] Joakim Nivre,et al. Squibs: Arc-Eager Parsing with the Tree Constraint , 2014, CL.
[16] Igor Mel’čuk,et al. Dependency Syntax: Theory and Practice , 1987 .
[17] Ramon Ferrer-i-Cancho,et al. Non-crossing dependencies: least effort, not grammar , 2014, ArXiv.
[18] David J. Weir,et al. Dependency Parsing Schemata and Mildly Non-Projective Dependency Parsing , 2011, CL.
[19] Ji Ma,et al. SyntaxNet Models for the CoNLL 2017 Shared Task , 2017, ArXiv.
[20] Carlos Gómez-Rodríguez,et al. The scarcity of crossing dependencies: a direct outcome of a specific constraint? , 2016, Physical review. E.
[21] Ramon Ferrer-i-Cancho,et al. Crossings as a side effect of dependency lengths , 2015, Complex..
[22] Rudolf Rosa,et al. HamleDT 2.0: Thirty Dependency Treebanks Stanfordized , 2014, LREC.
[23] Slav Petrov,et al. Globally Normalized Transition-Based Neural Networks , 2016, ACL.
[24] Giorgio Satta,et al. Dynamic Programming Algorithms for Transition-Based Dependency Parsers , 2011, ACL.
[25] Haitao Liu,et al. Dependency distance: A new perspective on syntactic patterns in natural languages. , 2017, Physics of life reviews.
[26] Joakim Nivre,et al. Mildly Non-Projective Dependency Structures , 2006, ACL.
[27] Richard Futrell,et al. Large-scale evidence of dependency length minimization in 37 languages , 2015, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.
[28] Sampath Kannan,et al. Finding Optimal 1-Endpoint-Crossing Trees , 2013, TACL.
[29] Sampath Kannan,et al. Dynamic Programming for Higher Order Parsing of Gap-Minding Trees , 2012, EMNLP.
[30] Noah A. Smith,et al. Parsing with Soft and Hard Constraints on Dependency Length , 2005, IWPT.
[31] Noah A. Smith,et al. Transition-Based Dependency Parsing with Stack Long Short-Term Memory , 2015, ACL.
[32] Carlos Gómez-Rodríguez,et al. Natural language processing and the Now-or-Never bottleneck , 2016, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.