Intelligent Decision Support for Maintenance: A New Role for Audit Trails

The changing nature of manufacturing, in recent years, is evident in industries willingness to adopt network connected intelligent machines in their factory development plans. While advances in sensors and sensor fusion techniques have been significant in recent years, the possibilities brought by Internet of Things create new challenges in the scale of data and its analysis. The development of audit trail style practice for the collection of data and the provision of comprehensive framework for its processing, analysis and use should be an important goal in addressing the new data analytics challenges for maintenance created by internet connected devices. This paper proposes that further research should be conducted into audit trail collection of maintenance data and the provision of a comprehensive framework for its processing analysis and use. The concept of ‘Human in the loop’ is also reinforced with the use of audit trails, allowing streamlined access to decision making and providing the ability to mine decisions.

[1]  Robert A. K. Duncan,et al.  Enhancing Cloud Security and Privacy: The Power and the Weakness of the Audit Trail , 2016, CLOUD 2016.

[2]  Andy Koronios,et al.  Developing a data quality framework for asset management in engineering organisations , 2007, Int. J. Inf. Qual..

[3]  Diego Galar,et al.  Maintenance 4.0 in Railway Transportation Industry , 2016, WCE 2016.

[4]  Irlán Grangel-González,et al.  An RDF-based approach for implementing industry 4.0 components with Administration Shells , 2016, 2016 IEEE 21st International Conference on Emerging Technologies and Factory Automation (ETFA).

[5]  Rayford B. Vaughn,et al.  Sensor fusion and automatic vulnerability analysis , 2005 .

[6]  C. Emmanouilidis,et al.  Integrated E-maintenance and Intelligent Maintenance Systems , 2009 .

[7]  Miriam Schleipen,et al.  Interoperability between OPC UA and AutomationML , 2014 .

[8]  Richard K. Lomotey,et al.  Traceability and visual analytics for the Internet-of-Things (IoT) architecture , 2017, World Wide Web.

[9]  Christos Emmanouilidis,et al.  Management of linked knowledge in industrial maintenance , 2016, Ind. Manag. Data Syst..

[10]  Bob Duncan,et al.  Enhancing cloud security and privacy: Time for a new approach? , 2016, 2016 Sixth International Conference on Innovative Computing Technology (INTECH).

[11]  Alek Gavrilovski,et al.  Review of Proactive Safety Metrics for Rotorcraft Operations and Improvements Using Model-Based Parameter Synthesis and Data Fusion , 2016 .

[12]  Sylvain Kubler,et al.  Opportunity to Leverage Information-as-an-Asset in the IoT -- The Road Ahead , 2015, 2015 3rd International Conference on Future Internet of Things and Cloud.

[13]  Yogesh L. Simmhan,et al.  The Open Provenance Model core specification (v1.1) , 2011, Future Gener. Comput. Syst..

[14]  Abrar Haider,et al.  Asset Lifecycle Data Governance Framework , 2015 .

[15]  Fakhri Alam Khan,et al.  Provenance based data integrity checking and verification in cloud environments , 2017, PloS one.

[16]  Noureddine Zerhouni,et al.  Towards A Maintenance Semantic Architecture , 2010 .

[17]  Ashutosh Tiwari,et al.  An automated optimisation framework for the development of re-configurable business processes: a web services approach , 2015, Int. J. Comput. Integr. Manuf..

[18]  A. Koronios,et al.  Classifying Data Quality Problems in Asset Management , 2015 .

[19]  Jay Lee,et al.  Cyber-Physical Systems in Future Maintenance , 2015 .

[20]  Daniel G. Bobrow,et al.  Diagnosing Advanced Persistent Threats: A Position Paper , 2015, DX.

[21]  Yuchun Xu,et al.  Process mining: from theory to practice , 2012, Bus. Process. Manag. J..