Workplace Development as Part of Broad-based Innovation Policy: Exploiting and Exploring Three Types of Knowledge

This paper looks at the possibilities that a broad-based innovation policy contained by the national innovation strategy recently adopted in Finland opens up for the promotion of workplace innovations and examines the types of knowledge needed in workplace development. The author highlights the interconnections between workplace development and the prerequisites of both economic growth and the preservation of the Finnish welfare state. The paper also aims to explain why, in addition to the productivity of work, improving the quality of working life should feature as an increasingly important aim in the innovation policy of the future. An argument for the need of three types of knowledge in workplace development - design knowledge, process knowledge and dissemination knowledge - is made, together with an overview on new developments in each of those three domains. In conclusion, the author demonstrates how problems in the productivity of work and the quality of working life can be simultaneously tackled with at work organization level through two kinds of development approaches.

[1]  Gil Preuss,et al.  Manufacturing Advantage: Why High-Performance Work Systems Pay Off , 2001 .

[2]  A. Pettigrew,et al.  Change and Complementarities in the New Competitive Landscape: A European Panel Study , 1999 .

[3]  Matti Pohjola,et al.  The roles of electricity and ICT in economic growth: Case Finland , 2008 .

[4]  Frans van den Bosch,et al.  Innovative forms of organizing : international perspectives , 2003 .

[5]  A. Pettigrew.  Context and Action in the Transformation of the Firm , 1987 .

[6]  L. Melin,et al.  Innovative Forms of Organizing , 2003 .

[7]  P. Brödner,et al.  Sources of innovation and competitiveness: National programmes supporting the development of work organisation , 2003 .

[8]  E. Rogers,et al.  Diffusion of innovations , 1964, Encyclopedia of Sport Management.

[9]  Johnathan Roberts,et al.  The Modern Firm: Organizational Design for Performance and Growth , 2004 .

[10]  Jeff Howe,et al.  Crowdsourcing: Why the Power of the Crowd Is Driving the Future of Business , 2008, Human Resource Management International Digest.

[11]  Tuomo Alasoini,et al.  Strategies to Promote Workplace Innovation: A Comparative Analysis of Nine National and Regional Approaches , 2009 .

[12]  Robert E. Cole,et al.  From a Firm-Based to a Community-Based Model of Knowledge Creation: The Case of the Linux Kernel Development , 2003, Organ. Sci..

[14]  T. Alasoini.  In Search of Generative Results: A New Generation of Programmes to Develop Work Organization , 2006 .

[15]  F. Lambrechts,et al.  An organizational development approach towards age diversity practices in belgian organizations , 2006 .

[16]  John Cullen,et al.  Democratizing Innovation , 2020, Encyclopedia of Creativity, Invention, Innovation and Entrepreneurship.

[17]  Jordi Gual.  Strategy, Organization and the Changing Nature of Work , 2001 .

[18]  Ted S. Sindlinger,et al.  Crowdsourcing: Why the Power of the Crowd is Driving the Future of Business , 2010 .

[19]  Keld Laursen,et al.  New human resource management practices, complementarities and the impact on innovation performance , 2003 .

[20]  T. Alasoini.  Building Better Programmes: Learning Networks in the Promotion of Workplace Innovation , 2008 .

[21]  A. Tupasela.  National Innovation System - Scientific Concept or Political Rhetoric , 2003 .

[22]  Lars Bengtsson,et al.  Continuous improvement capability in the Swedish engineering industry , 2007, Int. J. Technol. Manag..

[23]  Reinhilde Veugelers,et al.  The Evaluation of the Finnish National Innovation System - Full Report , 2009 .

[24]  Juha Pihlaja,et al.  Changes in production concepts emphasize problems in work-related well-being , 2007 .

[25]  David M. Trubek,et al.  Hard and Soft Law in the Construction of Social Europe: The Role of the Open Method of Co-Ordination , 2005 .

[26]  Elise Ramstad,et al.  Promoting performance and the quality of working life simultaneously , 2009 .

[27]  B. Gustavsen.  Dialogue and development: Theory of communication, action research and the restructuring of working life , 1992 .

[28]  Anthony Hesketh,et al.  Beyond Measuring the Human Resources Management-Organizational Performance Link: Applying Critical Realist Meta-Theory , 2006 .

[29]  T. Kauppinen,et al.  Työ ja terveys Suomessa 2009 , 2010 .

[30]  B. Gustavsen,et al.  Learning Regional Innovation: Scandinavian Models , 2010 .

[31]  Bjørn Gustavsen,et al.  Work Organization and `the Scandinavian Model' , 2007 .

[32]  Peter V. Nielsen,et al.  Innovation, Learning Organizations and Industrial Relations , 2003 .

[33]  J. Bessant.  High-Involvement Innovation: Building and Sustaining Competitive Advantage Through Continuous Change , 2003 .

[34]  Christina Sweins,et al.  Linking Theory and Practice , 2011 .

[35]  J. Marshall.  Open Innovation: The New Imperative for Creating and Profiting from Technology , 2004 .

[36]  P. Boxall,et al.  Strategy and Human Resource Management , 2002 .

[37]  John E. Delery,et al.  Modes of theorizing in strategic human resource management: Tests of universalistic, contingency, and configurational performance predictions , 1996 .