A Mokken Scale to Assess Secondary Pupils’ Experience of Violence in Terms of Severity

Violence assessment can potentially be improved by Item Response Theory, that is, ordinal Mokken Scale Analysis. The research question is as follows: Does Mokken Scale Analysis of secondary pupils’ experience of violence result in a homogeneous, reliable, and valid unidimensional scale that fits all the requirements of Mokken scaling? The method used is secondary analysis of Dutch national data collected from secondary school pupils in 2008 by means of a digital school safety survey. The first random sample (n1 = 14,388) was used to develop the scale; the second sample (n2 = 14,350) is meant to cross-validate the first results. Pupils’ experience of violence is assessed by 29 items reflecting six types of antisocial or aggressive behavior. A Mokken scale of 25 items meets the requirements of monotone homogeneity and double monotonicity. Ordering is invariant between boys and girls; being born in the Netherlands or not; and feeling at home in the Netherlands or not. These results are cross-validated in Sample 2. The latent construct concerns pupils’ experience of violence in terms of severity, varying from verbal and mild physical violence (relatively most frequent), to combinations of social, material, and severe physical violence, to very severe and serious sexual violence (relatively least frequent). Some limitations and further developments are discussed.

[1]  T. Moffitt Adolescence-limited and life-course-persistent antisocial behavior: a developmental taxonomy. , 1993, Psychological review.

[2]  S. Joseph,et al.  Development of the multidimensional peer-victimization scale , 2000 .

[3]  T P Klassen,et al.  How safe are our schools? , 1996, Canadian journal of public health = Revue canadienne de sante publique.

[4]  M. Furlong,et al.  Examination of the Latent Structure of the Psychological Sense of School Membership Scale , 2011 .

[5]  Klaas Sijtsma,et al.  Reliability of test scores in nonparametric item response theory , 1987 .

[6]  L. L. Marshall The Severity of Violence Against Men Scales , 1992, Journal of Family Violence.

[7]  Angela F. Y. Siu Validation of the Substance Use Risk Profile Scale for Adolescents in Hong Kong , 2011 .

[8]  R. Astor,et al.  School engagement, risky peers, and student–teacher relationships as mediators of school violence in Taiwanese vocational versus academically oriented high schools , 2011 .

[9]  L. Schover,et al.  Sex and Sexuality , 1982 .

[10]  D. Schwartz,et al.  Victimization in the Peer Group and Children's Academic Functioning. , 2005 .

[11]  J. Schafer Measuring Spousal Violence With the Conflict Tactics Scale , 1996 .

[12]  I. Borowsky,et al.  Adolescent Violence Perpetration: Associations With Multiple Types of Adverse Childhood Experiences , 2010, Pediatrics.

[13]  W. H. Schuur,et al.  Mokken Scale Analysis: Between the Guttman Scale and Parametric Item Response Theory , 2003, Political Analysis.

[14]  Jing Wang,et al.  Co-occurrence of victimization from five subtypes of bullying: physical, verbal, social exclusion, spreading rumors, and cyber. , 2010, Journal of pediatric psychology.

[15]  T. Mooij Secondary school teachers' personal and school characteristics, experience of violence and perceived violence motives , 2011 .

[16]  M. Petersen,et al.  Introduction to Nonparametric Item Response Theory , 2005, Quality of Life Research.

[17]  A. Mokros,et al.  A Cumulative Scale of Severe Sexual Sadism , 2009, Sexual abuse : a journal of research and treatment.

[18]  Ton Mooij,et al.  Multi-level aspects of social cohesion of secondary schools and pupils' feelings of safety. , 2011, The British journal of educational psychology.

[19]  T. Mooij Differences in pupil characteristics and motives in being a victim, perpetrator and witness of violence in secondary education , 2011 .

[20]  D. Cooke,et al.  The Structure of Violent Behavior , 2006 .

[21]  Robert J. Mokken,et al.  Nonparametric Models for Dichotomous Responses , 1997 .

[22]  D. Finkelhor,et al.  School, police, and medical authority involvement with children who have experienced victimization. , 2011, Archives of pediatrics & adolescent medicine.

[23]  D. Olweus,et al.  Prevalence estimation of school bullying with the Olweus Bully Victim Questionnaire , 2003 .

[24]  K. Bartholomew,et al.  The relative severity of acts of physical violence in heterosexual relationships: An item response theory analysis , 2006 .

[25]  R. Hambleton,et al.  Handbook of Modern Item Response Theory , 1997 .

[26]  Erika D. Felix,et al.  A Cluster Analytic Investigation of School Violence Victimization Among Diverse Students , 2009, Journal of interpersonal violence.

[27]  Klaas Sijtsma,et al.  MPS5 for Windows. A program for Mokken scale analysis for polytomous items , 2000 .

[28]  Robert J. Mokken,et al.  A Theory and Procedure of Scale Analysis. , 1973 .

[29]  Peter E. Leone,et al.  A Structural Analysis of School Violence and Disruption: Implications for Creating Safer Schools. , 1999 .

[30]  Adrienne Nishina,et al.  Subtypes, severity, and structural stability of peer victimization: what does latent class analysis say? , 2007, Child development.