Performance evaluation of complex systems using evidential reasoning approach with uncertain parameters

Abstract The composition of the modern aerospace system becomes more and more complex. The performance degradation of any device in the system may cause it difficult for the whole system to keep normal working states. Therefore, it is essential to evaluate the performance of complex aerospace systems. In this paper, the performance evaluation of complex aerospace systems is regarded as a Multi-Attribute Decision Analysis (MADA) problem. Based on the structure and working principle of the system, a new Evidential Reasoning (ER) based approach with uncertain parameters is proposed to construct a nonlinear optimization model to evaluate the system performance. In the model, the interval form is used to express the uncertainty, such as error in testing data and inaccuracy in expert knowledge. In order to analyze the subsystems that have a great impact on the performance of the system, the sensitivity analysis of the evaluation result is carried out, and the corresponding maintenance strategy is proposed. For a type of Inertial Measurement Unit (IMU) used in a rocket, the proposed method is employed to evaluate its performance. Then, the parameter sensitivity of the evaluation result is analyzed, and the main factors affecting the performance of IMU are obtained. Finally, the comparative study shows the effectiveness of the proposed method.

[1]  Weiwen Peng,et al.  Reliability analysis of complex multi-state system with common cause failure based on evidential networks , 2018, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[2]  Jian-Bo Yang,et al.  The evidential reasoning approach for multi-attribute decision analysis under interval uncertainty , 2006, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[3]  Stefano Tarantola,et al.  Sensitivity analysis practices: Strategies for model-based inference , 2006, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[4]  Chung-Hsing Yeh,et al.  Task oriented weighting in multi-criteria analysis , 1999, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[5]  Zhi-Jie Zhou,et al.  A safety assessment model based on belief rule base with new optimization method , 2020, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[6]  Francisco Rodrigues Lima Junior,et al.  An adaptive network-based fuzzy inference system to supply chain performance evaluation based on SCOR® metrics , 2020, Comput. Ind. Eng..

[7]  Chang-Hua Hu,et al.  A Survey of Belief Rule-Base Expert System , 2019, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics: Systems.

[8]  Wang He,et al.  Reliability analysis of stiffened tank-roof stability with multiple random variables using minimum distance and Lagrange methods , 2013 .

[9]  G. Mavrotas,et al.  Determining objective weights in multiple criteria problems: The critic method , 1995, Comput. Oper. Res..

[10]  Jian-Bo Yang,et al.  Coalitions of arguments: A tool for handling bipolar argumentation frameworks , 2010 .

[11]  Jian-Bo Yang,et al.  Rule and utility based evidential reasoning approach for multiattribute decision analysis under uncertainties , 2001, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[12]  Ilya M. Sobol,et al.  Sensitivity Estimates for Nonlinear Mathematical Models , 1993 .

[13]  Jian-Bo Yang,et al.  The evidential reasoning approach for multiple attribute decision analysis using interval belief degrees , 2006, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[14]  Dong-Ling Xu,et al.  Evidential reasoning rule for evidence combination , 2013, Artif. Intell..

[15]  A. Saltelli,et al.  Non-parametric statistics in sensitivity analysis for model output: A comparison of selected techniques , 1990 .

[16]  Jian-Bo Yang,et al.  A group evidential reasoning approach based on expert reliability , 2015, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[17]  Chang-Hua Hu,et al.  A New Evidential Reasoning-Based Method for Online Safety Assessment of Complex Systems , 2018, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics: Systems.

[18]  M. Singh,et al.  An Evidential Reasoning Approach for Multiple-Attribute Decision Making with Uncertainty , 1994, IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern. Syst..

[19]  Weixuan Xu,et al.  Estimating The Attribute Weights Through Evidential Reasoning And Mathematical Programming , 2004, Int. J. Inf. Technol. Decis. Mak..

[20]  Chung-Hsing Yeh,et al.  Inter-company comparison using modified TOPSIS with objective weights , 2000, Comput. Oper. Res..

[21]  Jian-Bo Yang,et al.  On the combination and normalization of interval-valued belief structures , 2007, Information Sciences.