Faculty Response to the Implementation of an Open Source Learning Management System in Three Tertiary Institutions in New Zealand

ABSTRACT In spite of their apparent benefits, learning management systems can be regarded as a hindrance to effective online learning. Their design, functionality, complexity, price, and value are beginning to be questioned by some users. As a new generation of Web-based tools and approaches evolves, Web-based learning management systems are becoming better suited to meet the need for dynamic online learning, interaction, collaboration, and networking. The new tools and collaborative approaches these systems provide allow learners to take proactive control of their own learning. In June 2004 a consortium of New Zealand Tertiary Institutions led by the Waikato Institute of Technology secured a one-year Ministry of Education grant to support the “Open Source Courseware Initiative New Zealand” (OSCINZ). The OSCINZ project focused on the development and implementation of “Moodle” (Modular Object-Oriented Dynamic Learning Environment) to create a uniquely New Zealand learning management system, based on quality open source code developed and tested by leading educational providers. This paper describes the response of faculty in three of the project's partner tertiary institutions to the implementation of Moodle in their institutions.

[1]  Michael Corry,et al.  Factors That Deter Faculty from Participation in Distance Education , 2002 .

[2]  Angie Parker.  Motivation and Incentives for Distance Faculty , 2003 .

[3]  John Clayton,et al.  E-LEARNING IN NEW ZEALAND INSTITUTES OF TECHNOLOGY / POLYTECHNICS : FINAL REPORT , 2005 .

[4]  Zane L. Berge,et al.  Overcoming Barriers to Distance Training and Education. , 2002 .

[5]  Linda L. Wolcott,et al.  What’s in it for Me? Incentives for Faculty Participation in Distance Education , 2007 .

[6]  Susan M. Fritz,et al.  Incentives and Obstacles Influencing Higher Education Faculty and Administrators to Teach Via Distance , 1999 .

[7]  Gwen Hillesheim.  Distance learning: Barriers and strategies for students and faculty , 1998, Internet High. Educ..

[8]  Michael Hotrum,et al.  Breaking Down the LMS Walls , 2005 .

[9]  Elizabeth Bennett,et al.  Needs, Concerns and Practices of Online Instructors , 2000 .

[10]  Van Weigal,et al.  From Course Management to Curricular Capabilities: A Capabilities Approach for the Next-Generation CMS , 2005 .

[11]  R. Newton.  Staff attitudes to the development and delivery of e‐learning , 2003 .

[12]  Theresa Pesl Murphrey,et al.  How the Perspectives of Administrators, Faculty, and Support Units Impact the Rate of Distance Education Adoption , 2000 .

[13]  Zane L. Berge,et al.  Barriers To Online Teaching In Post-Secondary Institutions: Can Policy Changes Fix It? , 1998 .

[14]  Michael T. Miller,et al.  Faculty Incentives to Participate in Distance Education , 1999 .

[15]  Susan Griswold Blandy.  What Do Faculty Want , 1992 .