Complexity of chaos and quantum computation

This paper reviews recent work related to the interplay between quantum information and computation on the one hand and classical and quantum chaos on the other. First, we present several models of quantum chaos that can be simulated efficiently on a quantum computer. Then a discussion of information extraction shows that such models can give rise to complete algorithms including measurements that can achieve an increase in speed compared with classical computation. It is also shown that models of classical chaos can be simulated efficiently on a quantum computer, and again information can be extracted efficiently from the final wave function. The total gain can be exponential or polynomial, depending on the model chosen and the observable measured. The simulation of such systems is also economical in the number of qubits, allowing implementation on present-day quantum computers, some of these algorithms having been already experimentally implemented. The second topic considered concerns the analysis of errors on quantum computers. It is shown that quantum chaos algorithms can be used to explore the effect of errors on quantum algorithms, such as random unitary errors or dissipative errors. Furthermore, the tools of quantum chaos allows a direct analysis of the effects of static errors on quantum computers. Finally, we consider the different resources used by quantum information, and show that quantum chaos has some precise consequences on entanglement generation, which becomes close to maximal. For another resource, interference, a proposal is presented for quantifying it, enabling a discussion on entanglement and interference generation in quantum algorithms.

[1]  O. Giraud,et al.  Intermediate quantum maps for quantum computation , 2005 .

[2]  R. Schack Using a quantum computer to investigate quantum chaos , 1997, quant-ph/9705016.

[3]  Quantum computing of quantum chaos in the kicked rotator model. , 2002, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[4]  A. J. Scott,et al.  Entangling power of the quantum baker's map , 2003, quant-ph/0305046.

[5]  Quantum chaos in the spectrum of operators used in Shor's algorithm. , 2006, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[6]  Peter W. Shor,et al.  Polynomial-Time Algorithms for Prime Factorization and Discrete Logarithms on a Quantum Computer , 1995, SIAM Rev..

[7]  O. Bohigas,et al.  Characterization of chaotic quantum spectra and universality of level fluctuation laws , 1984 .

[8]  V. Flambaum Time Dynamics in Chaotic Many-body Systems: Can Chaos Destroy a Quantum Computer? , 1999, quant-ph/9911061.

[9]  D. Shepelyansky,et al.  Stable quantum computation of unstable classical chaos. , 2001, Physical review letters.

[10]  Michael K. Henry,et al.  Localization in the quantum sawtooth map emulated on a quantum-information processor , 2005, quant-ph/0512204.

[11]  Daniel Braun Quantum chaos and quantum algorithms , 2002 .

[12]  Dima L. Shepelyansky,et al.  Dynamical localization simulated on a few-qubit quantum computer , 2003 .

[13]  Georgeot,et al.  Emergence of quantum chaos in the quantum computer core and how to manage it , 2000, Physical review. E, Statistical physics, plasmas, fluids, and related interdisciplinary topics.

[14]  E. Ott Chaos in Dynamical Systems: Contents , 1993 .

[15]  Raymond Laflamme,et al.  Interpretation of tomography and spectroscopy as dual forms of quantum computation , 2002, Nature.

[16]  Seth Lloyd,et al.  Universal Quantum Simulators , 1996, Science.

[17]  G. Brassard,et al.  Quantum Amplitude Amplification and Estimation , 2000, quant-ph/0005055.

[18]  Lov K. Grover Quantum Mechanics Helps in Searching for a Needle in a Haystack , 1997, quant-ph/9706033.

[19]  R Laflamme,et al.  Characterization of complex quantum dynamics with a scalable NMR information processor. , 2005, Physical review letters.

[20]  R. Feynman Quantum mechanical computers , 1986 .

[21]  Giuliano Benenti,et al.  Principles of Quantum Computation And Information: Basic Tools And Special Topics , 2007 .

[22]  Quantum chaos algorithms and dissipative decoherence with quantum trajectories. , 2005, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[23]  Klaus M. Frahm,et al.  Quantum chaos and random matrix theory for fidelity decay in quantum computations with static imperfections , 2003, quant-ph/0312120.

[24]  O. Zhirov,et al.  Dissipative decoherence in the Grover algorithm , 2005, quant-ph/0511010.

[25]  Alexei Y. Kitaev,et al.  Quantum measurements and the Abelian Stabilizer Problem , 1995, Electron. Colloquium Comput. Complex..

[26]  Quantum computation of a complex system: the kicked Harper model. , 2004, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[27]  Seth Lloyd,et al.  Pseudo-Random Unitary Operators for Quantum Information Processing , 2003, Science.

[28]  M. Berry,et al.  Level clustering in the regular spectrum , 1977, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. A. Mathematical and Physical Sciences.

[29]  D L Shepelyansky,et al.  Quantum computing of delocalization in small-world networks. , 2005, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[30]  Quantum computing of Poincare recurrences and periodic orbits (4 pages) , 2003, quant-ph/0307233.

[31]  V. Tsifrinovich,et al.  Avoiding quantum chaos in quantum computation. , 2001, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[32]  I. Chuang,et al.  Quantum Computation and Quantum Information: Introduction to the Tenth Anniversary Edition , 2010 .

[33]  Åberg Onset of chaos in rapidly rotating nuclei. , 1990, Physical review letters.

[34]  Seth Lloyd,et al.  Fidelity decay as an efficient indicator of quantum chaos. , 2002, Physical review letters.

[35]  Strange attractor simulated on a quantum computer , 2002, quant-ph/0203062.

[36]  G Benenti,et al.  Efficient quantum computing of complex dynamics. , 2001, Physical review letters.

[37]  Dima L. Shepelyansky,et al.  Quantum error correction of coherent errors by randomization , 2004 .

[38]  Georgeot,et al.  Quantum chaos border for quantum computing , 1999, Physical review. E, Statistical physics, plasmas, fluids, and related interdisciplinary topics.

[39]  Bertrand Georgeot,et al.  Quantitative measure of interference , 2006 .

[40]  David Poulin,et al.  Testing integrability with a single bit of quantum information , 2003 .

[41]  Exponential gain in quantum computing of quantum chaos and localization. , 2000, Physical review letters.

[43]  D L Shepelyansky,et al.  Quantum computation and analysis of Wigner and Husimi functions: toward a quantum image treatment. , 2005, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[44]  Yaakov S Weinstein,et al.  Entanglement generation of nearly random operators. , 2005, Physical review letters.

[45]  Emergence of Quantum Chaos in Finite Interacting Fermi Systems , 1997, cond-mat/9706040.

[46]  Testing statistical bounds on entanglement using quantum chaos. , 2002, Physical review letters.

[47]  Quantum computation of the Anderson transition in the presence of imperfections , 2003, quant-ph/0306203.

[48]  Entanglement across a transition to quantum chaos , 2004, quant-ph/0410246.

[49]  S. Lloyd,et al.  Quantum Algorithm Providing Exponential Speed Increase for Finding Eigenvalues and Eigenvectors , 1998, quant-ph/9807070.

[50]  Phase diagram for the Grover algorithm with static imperfections , 2004 .