People underestimate the value of persistence for creative performance.

Across 7 studies, we investigated the prediction that people underestimate the value of persistence for creative performance. Across a range of creative tasks, people consistently underestimated how productive they would be while persisting (Studies 1-3). Study 3 found that the subjectively experienced difficulty, or disfluency, of creative thought accounted for persistence undervaluation. Alternative explanations based on idea quality (Studies 1-2B) and goal setting (Study 4) were considered and ruled out and domain knowledge was explored as a boundary condition (Study 5). In Study 6, the disfluency of creative thought reduced people's willingness to invest in an opportunity to persist, resulting in lower financial performance. This research demonstrates that persistence is a critical determinant of creative performance and that people may undervalue and underutilize persistence in everyday creative problem solving.

[1]  Michael D. Mumford,et al.  Methods in Creativity Research: Multiple Approaches, Multiple Levels , 2012 .

[2]  S. Parnes.  Effects of extended effort in creative problem solving. , 1961 .

[3]  Teresa M. Amabile,et al.  Motivation and Creativity: Effects of Motivational Orientation on Creative Writers , 1985 .

[4]  C. Marlene Fiol,et al.  Creative Action in Organizations: Ivory Tower Visions and Real World Voices. , 1997 .

[5]  Norbert Schwarz,et al.  If It's Hard to Read, It's Hard to Do , 2008, Psychological science.

[6]  Matthijs Baas,et al.  Hedonic tone and activation level in the mood-creativity link: toward a dual pathway to creativity model. , 2008, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[7]  Daniel M. Oppenheimer,et al.  Uniting the Tribes of Fluency to Form a Metacognitive Nation , 2009, Personality and social psychology review : an official journal of the Society for Personality and Social Psychology, Inc.

[8]  Richard P. Larrick,et al.  Goals as Reference Points , 1999, Cognitive Psychology.

[9]  N. Schwarz,et al.  Processing Fluency and Aesthetic Pleasure: Is Beauty in the Perceiver's Processing Experience? , 2004, Personality and social psychology review : an official journal of the Society for Personality and Social Psychology, Inc.

[10]  J. Metcalfe,et al.  Intuition in insight and noninsight problem solving , 1987, Memory & cognition.

[11]  D. Simonton.  Creativity as Blind Variation and Selective Retention : Is the Creative Process Darwinian ? , 2022 .

[12]  Matthijs Baas,et al.  When prevention promotes creativity: the role of mood, regulatory focus, and regulatory closure. , 2011, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[13]  Michael A. Becker.  Social Psychology: Handbook of Basic Principles , 1998 .

[14]  M. Csíkszentmihályi,et al.  The Concept of Flow , 2014 .

[15]  M. Csíkszentmihályi.  Creativity: Flow and the Psychology of Discovery and Invention , 1996 .

[16]  S. Mednick.  The associative basis of the creative process. , 1962, Psychological review.

[17]  Bernard A. Nijstad,et al.  The illusion of group productivity: a reduction of failures explanation , 2006 .

[18]  Martin H. Levinson.  Creativity: Flow and the Psychology of Discovery and Invention , 1997 .

[19]  Daniel M. Oppenheimer,et al.  Overcoming intuition: metacognitive difficulty activates analytic reasoning. , 2007, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[20]  Karen Gasper,et al.  Affective feelings as feedback: Some cognitive consequences. , 2001 .

[21]  F. Strack,et al.  Ease of retrieval as information: Another look at the availability heuristic. , 1991 .

[22]  Marieke Roskes,et al.  Necessity is the mother of invention: avoidance motivation stimulates creativity through cognitive effort. , 2012, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[23]  Steven M. Smith.  The constraining effects of initial ideas. , 2003 .

[24]  M. Lorenzen.  Creativity in context : Content, cost, chance and collection in the organization of the film industry , 2009 .

[25]  Dean Keith Simonton,et al.  Scientific creativity as constrained stochastic behavior: the integration of product, person, and process perspectives. , 2003, Psychological bulletin.

[26]  B. Nijstad,et al.  Cognitive stimulation and interference in idea generating groups , 2003 .

[27]  D. Campbell.  Blind variation and selective retention in creative thought as in other knowledge processes. , 1960, Psychological review.

[28]  R. Sternberg.  Handbook of Creativity: Subject Index , 1998 .

[29]  Matthijs Baas,et al.  Working Memory Benefits Creative Insight, Musical Improvisation, and Original Ideation Through Maintained Task-Focused Attention , 2012, Personality & social psychology bulletin.

[30]  Michael D. Buhrmester,et al.  Amazon's Mechanical Turk , 2011, Perspectives on psychological science : a journal of the Association for Psychological Science.

[31]  B. Nijstad,et al.  Conceiving creativity: The nature and consequences of laypeople’s beliefs about the realization of creativity. , 2015 .

[32]  Teresa M. Amabile,et al.  Affect and Creativity at Work , 2005 .

[33]  Carol A. Manning,et al.  An evaluation of human act generation performance , 1987 .

[34]  N. Feather.  Expectations and Actions , 2021 .

[35]  Barry M. Staw,et al.  Why No One Really Wants Creativity , 1995 .

[36]  G. Clore,et al.  Feelings and phenomenal experiences , 1996 .

[37]  J. Schooler,et al.  The ineffability of insight. , 1995 .

[38]  J P GUILFORD,et al.  Relations of creative responses to working time and instructions. , 1957, Journal of experimental psychology.

[39]  Edward M. Bowden.  The Effect of Reportable and Unreportable Hints on Anagram Solution and the Aha! Experience , 1997, Consciousness and Cognition.

[40]  T. M. Amabile.  The social psychology of creativity: A componential conceptualization. , 1983 .

[41]  Teresa M. Amabile,et al.  Creativity In Context: Update To The Social Psychology Of Creativity , 1996 .

[42]  D. Simonton,et al.  Creative productivity, age, and stress: a biographical time-series analysis of 10 classical composers. , 1977, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[43]  J. Guilford,et al.  The nature of human intelligence. , 1968 .

[44]  J. Kounios,et al.  The Aha! Moment , 2009 .

[45]  Wolfgang Stroebe,et al.  How the Group Affects the Mind: A Cognitive Model of Idea Generation in Groups , 2006, Personality and social psychology review : an official journal of the Society for Personality and Social Psychology, Inc.