Monitoring and Controlling Bank Risk: Does Risky Debt Help?

We examine whether mandating banks to issue subordinated debt would enhance market monitoring and control risk taking. To evaluate whether subordinated debt enhances risk monitoring, we extract the credit-spread curve for each banking firm in our sample and examine whether changes in credit spreads reflect changes in bank risk variables, after controlling for changes in market and liquidity variables. We do not find strong and consistent evidence that they do. To evaluate whether subordinated debt controls risk taking, we examine whether the first issue of subordinated debt changes the risk-taking behavior of a bank. We find that it does not. We conclude that a mandatory subordinated debt requirement for banks is unlikely to provide the purported benefits of enhancing risk monitoring or controlling risk taking.

[1]  P. Harrison,et al.  Do Banks Strategically Time Public Bond Issuance Because of Accompanying Disclosure, Due Diligence, and Investor Scrutiny? , 2003 .

[2]  Ming Huang,et al.  How Much of Corporate-Treasury Yield Spread Is Due to Credit Risk?: A New Calibration Approach , 2003 .

[3]  G. Kaufman,et al.  The Effect of Credit Risk on Bank and Bank Holding Company Bond Yields: Evidence from the Post-FDICIA Period , 2002 .

[4]  D. Hancock,et al.  Market Discipline in Banking Reconsidered: The Roles of Deposit Insurance Reform, Funding Manager Decisions and Bond Market Liquidity , 2002 .

[5]  Ming Huang,et al.  How Much of Corporate-Treasury Yield Spread is Due to Credit Risk? , 2002 .

[6]  A. Sironi Strengthening banks' market discipline and leveling the playing field: Are the two compatible? , 2002 .

[7]  Yildiray Yildirim,et al.  Valuing Default Swaps Under Market and Credit Risk Correlation , 2002 .

[8]  J. Campbell,et al.  Equity Volatility and Corporate Bond Yields , 2002 .

[9]  P. Collin‐Dufresne,et al.  The Determinants of Credit Spread Changes , 2001 .

[10]  K. Stiroh,et al.  Market Discipline of Banks: The Asset Test , 2001 .

[11]  R. Bliss Market Discipline and Subordinated Debt: A Review of Some Salient Issues , 2001 .

[12]  William W. Lang,et al.  The Information Content of Bank Exam Ratings and Subordinated Debt Prices , 2001 .

[13]  D. Madan,et al.  Investigating the Sources of Default Risk: Lessons from Empirically Evaluating Credit Risk Models , 2001 .

[14]  Deepak Agrawal,et al.  Factors Affecting the Valuation of Corporate Bonds , 2000 .

[15]  A. Sironi Testing for Market Discipline in the European Banking Industry: Evidence from Subordinated Debt Issues , 2000 .

[16]  Douglas D. Evanoff,et al.  Subordinated debt as bank capital: a proposal for regulatory reform , 2000 .

[17]  E. Elton,et al.  Explaining the Rate Spread on Corporate Bonds , 1999 .

[18]  D. Duffie,et al.  Modeling term structures of defaultable bonds , 1999 .

[19]  S. H. Babbs,et al.  Kalman Filtering of Generalized Vasicek Term Structure Models , 1999, Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis.

[20]  G. Duffee The relation between Treasury yields and corporate bond yield spreads , 1998 .

[21]  M. Flannery Using Market Information in Prudential Bank Supervision: A Review of the U.S. Empirical Evidence , 1998 .

[22]  M. Flannery,et al.  Comparing Market and Supervisory Assessments of Bank Performance: Who Knows What When? , 1998 .

[23]  Sorin M. Sorescu,et al.  Evidence of Bank Market Discipline in Subordinated Debenture Yields: 1983-1991 , 1996 .

[24]  Narasimhan Jegadeesh,et al.  The Behavior of Interest Rates Implied by the Term Structure of Eurodollar Futures , 1996 .

[25]  John C. Hull,et al.  Numerical Procedures for Implementing Term Structure Models I , 1994 .

[26]  Maureen O'Hara,et al.  Deposit Insurance and Wealth Effects: The Value of Being “Too Big to Fail” , 1990 .

[27]  Gary B. Gorton,et al.  Market Discipline and Bank Subordinated Debt , 1990 .

[28]  M. A. Goldberg,et al.  Market Discipline in Regulating Bank Risk: New Evidence from the Capital Markets , 1988 .

[29]  R. H. Smith,et al.  Callable Bonds and Hedging , 2002 .

[30]  C. G. Coit,et al.  the Federal Reserve Bank of Cleveland. , 2022 .