Appetites and aspirations: Consuming wildlife in Laos

Research on wildlife use is strongly associated with conservation and environmental debates. Yet, popular beliefs about wildlife consumption also offer many opportunities for discussing identity and social change. To demonstrate this, I examine ideas about eating common types of wildlife in Laos in light of the dialectical contrast between civilised settlements (muang) and the wild forest (pa). The exclusion of wildlife from the widely practised baci ritual and the popularity of wildlife consumption indicate the potency of these animals as social objects. In a contemporary context of widespread social and environmental change across Laos, the practice of eating wildlife is being constructed as an assertion of Lao identity that blends an idealised tradition with a status-conscious modernity. Ambivalent desires for social transformation draw upon ambiguous symbols to find expression in beliefs as well as in popular social practice.

[1]  Sarinda Singh Governing Anti-conservation Sentiments: Forest Politics in Laos , 2009 .

[2]  Sarinda Singh World Bank-directed development? Negotiating participation in the Nam Theun 2 hydropower project in Laos , 2009 .

[3]  Sarinda Singh Living within the state: A dormitory community in central Laos , 2009 .

[4]  Sarinda Singh Contesting moralities: the politics of wildlife trade in Laos , 2008 .

[5]  Li Zhang,et al.  Wildlife trade, consumption and conservation awareness in southwest China , 2008, Biodiversity and Conservation.

[6]  E. Renne Mass Producing Food Traditions for West Africans Abroad , 2007 .

[7]  Sidney C. H. Cheung,et al.  Food and Foodways in Asia : Resource, Tradition and Cooking , 2007 .

[8]  J. Smith Culture, nature and religious conflict in neoliberal Kenya , 2006 .

[9]  Jon D. Holtzman,et al.  Food and Memory , 2006 .

[10]  R. Godoy,et al.  Role of Prices and Wealth in Consumer Demand for Bushmeat in Gabon, Central Africa , 2005 .

[11]  C. Lyttleton Relative Pleasures: Drugs, Development and Modern Dependencies in Asia's Golden Triangle , 2004 .

[12]  J. Knight Cultural underpinnings of the wildlife trade in Southeast Asia , 2004 .

[13]  A. Turton Civility and Savagery: Social Identity in Tai States , 2000 .

[14]  M. Mullin Mirrors and Windows: Sociocultural Studies of Human-Animal Relationships , 1999 .

[15]  S. Whatmore,et al.  Wild(er)ness: Reconfiguring the Geographies of Wildlife , 1998 .

[16]  Jonathan Rigg,et al.  *!..,: .i . A. ii A Forests and farmers, land and livelihoods, changing resource realities in Thailand , 1993 .

[17]  E. Leach,et al.  Anthropological Aspects of Language: Animal Categories and Verbal Abuse , 1989 .

[18]  S. Tambiah The Buddhist saints of the forest and the cult of amulets: Contents , 1984 .

[19]  R. Davis Muang metaphysics: A study of Northern Thai myth and ritual , 1984 .

[20]  M. Douglas,et al.  Natural Symbols: Explorations in Cosmology. , 1970 .

[21]  S. Tambiah Buddhism and the Spirit Cults in North-East Thailand , 1970 .

[22]  S. Tambiah Animals Are Good to Think and Good to Prohibit , 1969 .

[23]  G. Wijeyewardene Address, Abuse and Animal Categories in Northern Thailand , 1968 .