Can Artificial Intelligence Assist Project Developers in Long-Term Management of Energy Projects? The Case of CO2 Capture and Storage

This paper contributes to the state of the art of applications of artificial intelligence (AI) in energy systems with a focus on the phenomenon of social acceptance of energy projects. The aim of the paper is to present a novel AI-powered communication and engagement framework for energy projects. The method can assist project managers of energy projects to develop AI-powered virtual communication and engagement agents for engaging their citizens and their network of stakeholders who influence their energy projects. Unlike the standard consultation techniques and large-scale deliberative engagement approaches that require face-to-face engagement, the virtual engagement platform provides citizens with a forum to continually influence project outcomes at the comfort of their homes or anywhere via mobile devices. In the communication and engagement process, the project managers’ cognitive capability can be augmented with the probabilistic capability of the algorithm to gain insights into the stakeholders’ positive and negative feelings on the project, in order to devise interventions to co-develop an acceptable energy project. The proposed method was developed using the combined capability of fuzzy logic and a deep neural network incorporated with a Likert scaling strategy to reason with and engage people. In a mainstream deep neural network, one requires lots of data to build the system. The novelty of our system, however, in relation to the mainstream deep neural network approach, is that one can even use small data of a few hundreds to build the system. Further, its performance can be improved over time as it learns more about the future. We have tested the feasibility of the system using citizens’ affective responses to CO2 storage and the system demonstrated 90.476% performance.

[1]  David H. Wolpert,et al.  Stacked generalization , 1992, Neural Networks.

[2]  Linda Steg,et al.  Emotional Responses to Energy Projects: Insights for Responsible Decision Making in a Sustainable Energy Transition , 2018, Sustainability.

[3]  Qing Li,et al.  A novel Likert scale based on fuzzy sets theory , 2013, Expert Syst. Appl..

[4]  Ashley I. Naimi,et al.  Stacked generalization: an introduction to super learning , 2017, bioRxiv.

[5]  Rolf Wüstenhagen,et al.  Social acceptance of renewable energy innovation: An introduction to the concept , 2007 .

[6]  Carl A Latkin,et al.  The relationship between social desirability bias and self-reports of health, substance use, and social network factors among urban substance users in Baltimore, Maryland. , 2017, Addictive behaviors.

[7]  Geoffrey E. Hinton,et al.  Deep Learning , 2015, Nature.

[8]  F. Coyle,et al.  ‘Best practice’ community dialogue: The promise of a small-scale deliberative engagement around the siting of a carbon dioxide capture and storage (CCS) facility , 2016 .

[9]  Al Anneloes Meijnders,et al.  Social acceptance of carbon dioxide storage , 2007 .

[10]  Sarah Mander,et al.  Understanding key elements in establishing a social license for CCS: An empirical approach , 2018 .

[11]  John D Graham,et al.  “Not in (or Under) My Backyard”: Geographic Proximity and Public Acceptance of Carbon Capture and Storage Facilities , 2014, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.

[12]  Maija Hujala,et al.  The acceptability of wind farms: the impact of public participation , 2017 .

[13]  Nicole M. A. Huijts,et al.  Sustainable Energy Technology Acceptance: A psychological perspective , 2013 .

[14]  A. Umar,et al.  Causes and consequences of crude oil pipeline vandalism in the Niger delta region of Nigeria: A confirmatory factor analysis approach , 2017 .

[15]  Huapeng Wu,et al.  Emotional responses to energy projects: A new method for modeling and prediction beyond self-reported emotion measure , 2020 .

[16]  Youyong Kong,et al.  Deep Direct Reinforcement Learning for Financial Signal Representation and Trading , 2017, IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks and Learning Systems.

[17]  Leo Breiman,et al.  Statistical Modeling: The Two Cultures (with comments and a rejoinder by the author) , 2001 .

[18]  Gareth Johnson,et al.  Negative emissions technologies and carbon capture and storage to achieve the Paris Agreement commitments , 2018, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences.

[19]  Anne-Maree Dowd,et al.  A Social Licence for Carbon Dioxide Capture and Storage: How Engineers and Managers Describe Community Relations , 2014 .

[20]  J. Russell,et al.  The circumplex model of affect: An integrative approach to affective neuroscience, cognitive development, and psychopathology , 2005, Development and Psychopathology.

[21]  Galit Shmueli,et al.  To Explain or To Predict? , 2010, 1101.0891.

[22]  T. Yarkoni,et al.  Choosing Prediction Over Explanation in Psychology: Lessons From Machine Learning , 2017, Perspectives on psychological science : a journal of the Association for Psychological Science.

[23]  Cees J H Midden,et al.  The Role of Trust in the Affective Evaluation of Novel Risks: The Case of CO2 Storage , 2009, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.

[24]  Peta Ashworth,et al.  The Language of Science and Social Licence to Operate , 2017 .

[25]  Sabine Roeser,et al.  Nuclear Energy, Risk, and Emotions , 2011 .

[26]  L. Steg,et al.  Psychological factors influencing sustainable energy technology acceptance: A review-based comprehensive framework , 2012 .

[27]  Michael Siegrist,et al.  Public perception of carbon capture and storage (CCS): A review , 2014 .

[28]  Paul Upham,et al.  Towards a cross-paradigmatic framework of the social acceptance of energy systems , 2015 .

[29]  Zsuzsanna Eszter Tóth,et al.  Applying a fuzzy questionnaire in a peer review process , 2018, Total Quality Management & Business Excellence.